derrick alternatives
9 Best Derrick Alternatives for B2B Data Teams in 2026
We evaluated 9 alternatives on the four things that actually decide a data budget: match rate, bounce on a live send, real cost per valid contact, and EU phone coverage. Same list, same week, every tool. Derrick is newer and lighter than most on this page, and its own users rate it well for the sheets workflow — it just isn't built for the job Enrow is built for.
9 tools tested
updated July 6, 2026
14 min read
Derrick is a sticker-price, clever enrichment add-on that lives inside Google Sheets. The credit price looks tiny — until you count the rows that come back empty and the ones that bounce, because a spreadsheet aggregator bills per datapoint processed, not per valid find.
The switch is Enrow: verified emails plus GDPR-cleared EU direct dials, found in real time and charged only when the result is valid, from $17/month, with Pro at ~$0.0087 per valid email. Its Chrome extension drops the whole verified contact from LinkedIn into your CRM in one click — no formula, no sheet. And the free tier restocks: 50 credits, every month.
The alternatives at a glance
for verified emails and EU phones you only pay for when they're valid, Enrow is the move: $17/month in, with Pro at about $0.0087 per valid email, and a Chrome extension that writes the whole contact into your CRM. The other eight each hold one narrow lane. Emelia if you want to send from the same login, Anymailfinder or Findymail if you only need US emails, Dropcontact if a French DPO signs off on your stack. Route by niche below; none of them is the better overall buy for data quality.
Why teams look for Derrick alternatives
Derrick is a smart, sticker-price add-on, and people still outgrow it for three reasons. None of that improves on a bigger plan. You just process more rows.
Conflict of interest disclosure
Enrow is mine, and it sits at #1 on a list I wrote. Now you know my bias as precisely as I do.
What I won't do is dress up the ranking. A few tools below cover more ground than Enrow — sequencing, sending, whole enrichment menus stacked into a sheet. We build none of that, deliberately. One product, one obsession: the most accurate emails and EU direct dials you can buy, verified before you're charged a cent. That narrow scope is exactly why the data holds up, and I'd trade breadth for it every time.
Want a hundred data points in a spreadsheet? Derrick or a tool below will do it. Want the email and the phone to be right when you send and dial? That's the whole point of Enrow.
The 9 best Derrick alternatives
1. Enrow
#1
Full disclosure, said twice: this one is mine, and tools like Derrick are part of why it exists. I got tired of paying to enrich files, finding a fraction, and still eating bounces — so I built the meter I actually wanted to be billed on.
That meter is the whole argument. Derrick fills cells by cross-referencing sources, and credits drain per datapoint whether the address is real or not. Enrow charges when the email is verified and deliverable, and at no other moment. A miss is free. So is a bounce, because a bad address never counts as valid to begin with.
Then phones, which Derrick has no serious answer for. Enrow's Direct Phone Finder returns dials in the US and across Europe, where we hold the legal documentation to source EU mobiles. A French or German number isn't a shrug here.
And the workflow trick nobody else on this page does. Open a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, click once, and the Chrome extension writes the complete verified record — email, direct dial, every field — straight into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive. No formula, no copy-paste, no half-empty card. For the agent crowd there's an official MCP server too (repo github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp), so Claude or Cursor can call the finder and verifier directly; details on the API page.
Verification is where the two stop being comparable. Derrick aggregates what its providers hand back; Enrow runs 10+ checks per address — multiple SMTP passes plus catch-all probes from servers in different regions — before anything counts. Catch-alls come back verified and usable instead of dumped as "risky." On my mixed list, discovery ran around 60-70% and the live send bounced under 1%. Observed on that list, not a contractual promise.
- +Billed only on valid results; misses and bounces cost nothing
- +US and EU direct dials, with the GDPR paperwork held for the European ones
- +10+ verification checks per email; catch-alls verified and delivered
- +One click moves the full verified contact from LinkedIn into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive
- +Native Clay, HubSpot, Salesforce and Pipedrive integrations, plus a documented API and MCP server
- +No per-seat fees; Pro and Scale credits roll over
- –No searchable database to browse. Stored databases age, and you end up pitching people who already left; real-time lookup is the fix we chose, so list sourcing stays in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
- –It won't send your campaigns. Sequencing is a product we refuse to build — Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist handle that.
- –Company data stops at LinkedIn depth. No technographics, where Derrick will happily hand you a tech-stack column.
Three tiers, priced monthly. Start: 1,000 credits for $17, or 4,000 for $47 (monthly only). Pro: 10,000 for $87, 20,000 for $167, 30,000 for $247. Scale: 50,000 for $397, 80,000 for $597, 140,000 for $997, 200,000 for $1,397. Annual trims Pro and Scale by about 10%, so 10,000 lands near $78/mo and 50,000 near $357/mo.
One credit buys one email; a phone runs 40 credits; a verification is 0.25, catch-all included. Nothing is charged unless the result is valid, so the cleaner comparison base is Pro: $87 buys 10,000 valid emails or 250 valid phones, about $0.0087 per email or $0.35 per phone. Start remains the $17 entry tier. Pro and Scale credits roll over.
Derrick per-credit rate looks attractive on paper. But its credits pay for datapoints processed — finds, verifies, AI columns, empty rows — while Enrow's pay only for a verified email that lands. Once you divide by what actually delivers, the gap closes hard and then reverses on anything you'll send to.
The free tier refills on its own: 50 credits every month, no card, for as long as you want. And since credits only burn on valid results, none of the 50 die on a guess.
Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.
2. Emelia
Emelia is a different job. It sends.
It's a sequencer with a finder bolted on: cold email, LinkedIn steps, warm-up, one login. Derrick never played in that lane, and neither do we — which is exactly why Emelia is where we point people who ask us for sequencing.
As a data source it's respectable rather than the headline. Finder credits burn on results found, phone coverage is thin, and heavy data use lands on add-on packs instead of the base plan. The setup I actually recommend reads the same as always: Enrow finds and verifies, Emelia sends.
- +Find, verify and send (cold email + LinkedIn + warm-up) in one place
- +Finder credits charge on results found
- +Sales Navigator scraping and waterfall enrichment included
- +Unlimited sending and contacts on paid plans
- –Thin phone coverage; not a dialing tool
- –Heavy data use pushes into add-on credit packs
- –Outreach-first, so data depth trails the pure finders
Converted from EUR (+20%): Start about $44/month (3 mailboxes, 1 LinkedIn seat, 500 credits), Grow about $116, Scale about $356. A standalone 1,000-credit finder add-on runs about $23/month. Bigger PAYG packs are slider-computed (verify).
Because credits burn on found results, the sticker tracks real cost — but the finder lives in add-on packs, so your true $/valid email depends on the pack you buy (verify). One credit is an email found; a phone runs 50, and coverage is too thin to price honestly.
vs Enrow: no contest on data, and Emelia wouldn't claim otherwise. Feed it Enrow's verified contacts at $0.017 apiece and both tools do their best work.
3. Prospeo
Prospeo competes with Derrick on the thing Derrick sells hardest: price. Look past it.
On my list it found about 20% of the contacts. Enrow found 60-70%. Prospeo bills per found email — a miss costs nothing — so that gap doesn't inflate your price per contact; it just means four in five targets never come back, and you finish the list in a second tool.
The rest is what the price point buys. Quality gets uneven past small jobs, phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU coverage (verify), free-plan credits don't roll over, and pricing is per user. Its per-found sticker is real — a miss is free — but it opens above Enrow's, and at that price its coverage reaches only a fraction of a list.
- +1 credit per found email, 0 on a miss
- +Quick Chrome extension for LinkedIn and domains
- +Verification included in the same credit pool
- +Free plan (100 credits/month)
- –Found about 20% of my test list; most contacts simply don't come back
- –Phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU story (verify)
- –No rollover on the free tier, and per-user pricing stacks on teams
Prospeo: Starter $49/month for 2,000 credits, Growth $99 (5,000), Pro $249 (15,000). Annual takes about 25% off. Mobiles cost 10 credits.
The sticker reads about $0.0245 per valid email on Starter — already 1.6× Enrow's $0.017 at matched volume. Because Prospeo bills per found email, that $0.0245 is the real per-valid cost, not an understatement: a miss is free. Where it hurts is coverage, not price. It returned about a fifth of my list, so at that rate you reach a small slice of your targets and finish the rest elsewhere — the low find rate costs you reach, not a higher per-contact bill.
vs Enrow: the sticker already runs above Enrow, and the find rates live on different planets. Enrow's $0.017 with 60-70% discovery buys a finished list, not a fifth of one.
Anymailfinder does one thing Derrick doesn't guarantee: it only charges when the email verifies.
Verified emails, billed on the found-and-checked result. No phones, no database, no CRM push, no spreadsheet. One credit buys one found email, checking an outside address is cheaper, and unused credits roll over while you stay subscribed. The meter is honest and the scope fits in a sentence. On a messy list the unverifiable rows cost me nothing, which kept the bill clean.
- +Charged only for emails confirmed valid
- +Strong catch-all handling
- +Credits roll over while subscribed
- +Simple single, bulk or API access
- –Email-only, no phones at all
- –Entry sits at $0.049 per valid email, roughly 3× Enrow's rate at matched volume
- –No CRM push or contact export to speak of
Priced in USD: Standard from $29/month (400 credits) through $49 (1,000) and $89 (2,000); Scale $149 (5,000) and $199 (10,000); Ultimate $299 (25,000) up to $799 (100,000). Annual runs roughly a third cheaper. One credit buys one found email.
Per-found billing keeps the sticker honest: the $49 tier works out to about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 3× Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume, easing toward $0.020 at 10,000 and near Enrow only up at 100,000.
vs Enrow: same billing philosophy, half the product, and about triple the entry rate per valid email. Match the volume and Enrow undercuts it, then adds the phones and CRM export Anymailfinder never set out to build.
5. LeadMagic
LeadMagic is Derrick's idea — many data points, one credit pool — pointed at engineers instead of spreadsheets.
It's API-shaped: 15+ enrichment endpoints (email, mobile, company, profile, job changes) on a shared pool, with an MCP server for agent workflows. Credits deduct only on success, which is the right default and more than Derrick promises. Where Derrick lives in Sheets, LeadMagic lives in your code.
It's also not something you hand a rep. There's no product to click around in, EU phone coverage is unpublished (verify), and rollover starts one tier up. The docs read better than most tools' dashboards, which tells you exactly who it's for.
- +Pay-per-valid: failed matches cost nothing
- +15+ endpoints on one shared credit pool
- +Developer tooling: API, CLI, MCP server
- +Mobile finder included in the same pool
- –No rollover on the entry Basic plan
- –Mobiles cost 5× an email, with no published EU/GDPR phone detail (verify)
- –API-first, so non-developers stall
LeadMagic: Basic $49/month (2,000 credits), Essential $99 (5,000; rollover starts here, up to 2 months), Growth $249 (20,000), Professional $499 (50,000), Ultimate $849 (100,000). Emails cost 1 credit, mobiles 5, validation 0.25, deducted only on success.
Basic prices a valid email at about $0.0245 and a mobile near $0.12. That phone ratio is not comparable to the Enrow valid-phone metric because it comes with no published EU coverage or quality documentation (verify) — a different promise than a documented EU direct dial. Headline prices on unknowns are still unknowns.
vs Enrow: two honest meters, two audiences. Enrow matches the API story, then adds the rep-facing product: a UI, the extension, one-click CRM export, and EU phones with the paperwork behind them.
6. Hunter
Hunter is the tool most people learn email finding on, and it's strong at one move Derrick fakes with a formula: domain search.
Feed it a company and it maps the addresses it can find, scored for confidence. That's genuinely useful, and its 4.4/5 on G2 across 600+ reviews is earned as the on-ramp. We ran the full field in our Hunter breakdown.
The catch is the meter and the data. Hunter bills per search attempted, not per valid address found — so you pay whether or not the search returns anything usable, and in a public 20,000-contact benchmark only about a third of its searches (~32.5%) came back with an address. Worse, ~11.2% of those addresses bounce, pattern guesses included. Coverage is crawl-based, so it's solid on big companies and thin on the smaller firms where most ICPs live. And there are no phone numbers anywhere in the product.
- +Excellent domain-search UX; maps a company's addresses fast
- +Real free plan and integrations everywhere
- +Confidence scoring on every result
- +Familiar to almost every SDR
- –Billed per search attempted, not per valid — only ~1 in 3 return an address, and ~11% of those bounce
- –No phone data on any plan
- –Crawled data thins out on smaller companies
Hunter charges the same figure in USD and EUR: Starter $49/month (2,000 credits), Growth $149 (10,000), Scale $299 (25,000). Annual is about two months free. A credit is spent per search attempted, not per valid address; verification is 0.5.
The sticker reads about $0.0245 per search on Starter, already 1.6× Enrow's $0.017. But that buys an attempt, not a result, and the gap between the two is the whole story. Start with coverage: in a public 20,000-contact benchmark only ~32.5% of Hunter's searches returned an address, so you pay for roughly three attempts to land one hit — about $0.075 per address found before anyone hits send. Then deliverability: ~11.2% of those addresses bounce, and Hunter's credits reset monthly with nothing carried over, so the haircuts compound — $0.0245 ÷ 0.325 ÷ 0.888 ÷ 0.78 lands near $0.109 per deliverable valid, about 6.4× Enrow's Start rate and ~12.5× Pro. You pay a lot, for not much, and part of the little that lands is dead on arrival. At 25,000, $299 against Enrow's $167 for 20,000 is monthly-versus-monthly, and Enrow's number is already all-valid.
vs Enrow: Hunter charges for the search whether or not it lands; Enrow charges only when the address is verified and deliverable — a miss is free, a bounce is free — adds EU direct dials Hunter has never had, and opens at $17.
7. Snov
Snov sells the bundle: finder, verifier, drip campaigns, a light CRM, one modest bill.
Fair pitch for a solo user with loose data standards. But the credits burn on the search, not the valid: you pay whether or not it returns a usable address, and Snov sits in no public benchmark, so assume the ~30% find rate typical of these tools — the bill is roughly 3× the sticker before you send. Worse, the stored rows it does return drift stale, so part of that bounces. A visible share of my Snov finds wanted a second verification pass before I'd send.
- +Finder, verifier, drip campaigns and CRM in one subscription
- +Searchable prospect database included
- +Unlimited team seats on paid plans
- +Annual billing cuts 25%
- –Billed per search, not per valid; only ~30% (assumed) return anything, and stale rows bounce
- –No EU phone play; phones are a separate token add-on
- –A lot of platform if verified emails are all you need
Snov: Starter $39/month (1,000 credits), Pro S $99 (5,000), Pro M $189 (20,000), Pro L $369 (50,000), Ultra $738 (100,000+). Annual takes 25% off. Phones live in a separate token add-on around $0.02 a token.
The $0.039 sticker buys a search, not a deliverable address, and the same double penalty applies. Snov publishes no benchmark, so assume the ~30% find rate typical of these tools: that alone lifts the real cost to about $0.13 per email found, three-plus times the sticker before you've sent anything. Then dock the stored rows that come back stale and bounce, plus credits that reset monthly with no carry-over, and it climbs again. You pay whether or not anything usable comes back, and part of what does is already dead — several times Enrow's $0.017 per valid, which bills only when the address is real.
vs Enrow: Snov is the headline wrapper; the data inside is the weak part. Enrow is only the data — fresh and billed on valid — and it pairs with any sender, Snov's included.
8. Findymail
I'll give Findymail its due: it's a real email finder, and on US addresses it performs.
It also bills the way an aggregator like Derrick should — on the found, verified result, zero on a miss, zero on a bounce. Point it at a domain list or a LinkedIn export and what comes back tends to survive a live send. We go deeper in our Findymail breakdown.
The ceiling is geography and the floor price. GDPR closed EU phones to Findymail, so for European calling it's a spectator, and phones elsewhere are sparse. The floor is $49/month for 1,000 credits, rollover caps at 2× the monthly allowance, and there's no meaningful free plan. On my list its US addresses held up; the French half came back email-only.
- +Charged on found, verified results, so a bounce never costs you
- +Strong US B2B email accuracy
- +SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR-compliant, EU-hosted
- +Native HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Instantly and lemlist integrations
- –No EU phone data (GDPR-blocked); phones elsewhere are thin
- –Rollover caps at 2× the monthly allowance
- –No meaningful free plan; the floor is $49/month
Findymail is a single Starter slider: it opens at $49/month for 1,000 finder credits and steps up to $99 for 5,000 (the default card), then higher, with custom Enterprise above. Annual is about two months free. Phones cost 10 credits each; rollover caps at 2× the monthly allowance.
Per-valid billing keeps the sticker honest: the $49 floor is about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 2.9× Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume, easing to $0.0198 at 5,000 and only nearing Enrow's rate up at 100,000. Phones price near $0.20 on paper — except the paper excludes Europe, so on an EU-heavy list that number buys nothing.
vs Enrow: same honest meter, narrower map, higher entry rate. Enrow opens at $17 instead of $49, prices a valid email at $0.017 against Findymail's $0.049 at that volume, and returns the EU direct dials Findymail legally can't.
9. Dropcontact
Dropcontact is the pick your DPO would make, and it competes with Derrick on the same job: enriching rows you already have.
Everything runs under GDPR on EU servers, the data is computed fresh rather than pulled from a resold list, and it carries French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) most tools skip. Emails work pay-on-success: an address it can't find gets the credit reimbursed. For cleaning a French or European CRM it's a fair specialist, and our Dropcontact page runs the full comparison.
But read the job description. Like Derrick, Dropcontact enriches rows you feed it; it isn't built to hunt a contact from scratch the way a finder is. Each processed contact consumes a credit, and phones only appear when one can be scraped from an email signature — so there's no direct-dial product behind the promise. It cleaned my French rows nicely and produced two phone numbers across a hundred contacts.
- +GDPR-first: EU servers, compliant by design
- +Pay-on-success on emails; unfound addresses are reimbursed
- +French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) built in
- +CRM-native enrichment for HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho
- –Enriches existing rows; not a real-time finder for new contacts
- –Phones come only from signature scraping, no direct-dial product
- –~$35 entry buys 500 credits with no rollover; carry-over needs the pricier Growth plan
Dropcontact opens at €29/month, about $35 converted, for 500 credits with no rollover. Next tiers add carry-over plus LinkedIn and company enrichment: €59 (~$71) for 1,500, €89 (~$107) for 4,000, on up to €1,349 for 100,000; Enterprise is quote-only. Annual runs about 20% cheaper.
One credit per processed contact puts the entry math at about $0.070 per contact — roughly 4× Enrow's $0.017 at the same low volume — softened only on emails it fails to find. The multiple shrinks with volume but stays above Enrow, landing near 2× even at 100,000. There's no per-phone figure to quote, because there's no real phone product.
vs Enrow: the honest framing is enrichment versus finding. Dropcontact completes rows you already own and refunds the emails it misses; Enrow finds and verifies new contacts in real time at $0.017 per valid email against Dropcontact's ~$0.070 per processed row at entry, and returns documented EU direct dials instead of signature scraps.
Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Final verdict
Derrick is a genuinely neat piece of work: 100+ data points, cross-referenced from many sources, filled straight into a spreadsheet for a few euros a month. For a one-off enrichment pass by someone who lives in Google Sheets, it earns its keep. The wall is what happens next — the credit rate hides the real cost once empty and bouncing rows are counted, there's no verified EU direct dial, and a sheet is not a pipeline. Enrow is the switch: verified emails and documented EU direct dials, found in real time, from $17/month, charged only when the result is real. It won't hand you a browsable database, a tech-stack column or a sequence — we left those to LinkedIn, to enrichment aggregators, and to senders like Emelia on purpose, because doing data only is why the data holds up. And nobody else here does the last trick: one click in the Chrome extension turns a LinkedIn profile into a complete verified contact, phone included, sitting in your CRM. Take the 50 free credits you get back every month and let your own list vote.
Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.
Everything you need to know
What's the best free alternative to Derrick?
How does Derrick pricing compare with Enrow?
Does Derrick find phone numbers?
What's the most accurate Derrick alternative?
Can I get Derrick's data into my CRM without a spreadsheet?
Is Derrick good for B2B enrichment?
How we evaluated these tools
Nobody paid to be here. No affiliate links, no sponsored slots, and the winner wasn't for sale. Every tool processed the same contact list inside the same week, and four measures decided the order: how many contacts actually came back, how many addresses bounced on a live send, what a valid contact really costs once bad results are priced in, and whether the tool can produce legally-sourced EU phone numbers. Competitor prices come from official pricing pages read on 2026-07-06; anything I couldn't confirm on a live page carries a "verify" mark.
utilisateur illimité
Prêt à passer à la vitesse supérieure
sans cb
aucun setup requis