lusha alternatives
8 Best Lusha Alternatives for Direct Dials and EU Phones in 2026
So we tested eight alternatives, and kept Lusha in as the baseline to measure them against. The yardsticks are the ones that actually decide a phone budget: phone match rate, how many revealed numbers connect versus bounce, real cost per valid phone rather than per credit, and geographic reach, legally-sourced EU direct dials above all. One list. Every tool, same week.
8 tools tested
updated July 2, 2026
15 min read
Lusha pulls a direct dial off a LinkedIn profile in two clicks. That's the draw. The catch is the meter and whether the number rings: a phone reveal costs 10 credits (quietly doubled from 5 in 2026), so a 400-credit Starter plan is really about 40 phones a month, and each revealed number is a stored database row that can be stale.
Its own marketing cites ~85-90% phone accuracy, but that's a US/UK/Canada figure; reps report it sliding hard in continental Europe.
The best Lusha alternative for teams that dial is Enrow — a real Direct Phone Finder with GDPR-cleared EU direct dials, found and verified in real time, billed only when the number is valid, from $17/month. A phone is 40 credits charged only on a valid result, so at Pro that's about $0.35 per valid phone ($87 for 10,000 credits = 250 phones).
Here's the part no tool on this list does. Enrow's Chrome extension pushes the full verified contact — every field, email and phone — from a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile straight into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click.
Enrow is #1; the alternatives below each win a narrow niche, with Lusha itself kept as the baseline to measure against. None is the better overall buy.
The alternatives at a glance
Enrow is the best overall Lusha alternative for teams that dial and want GDPR-cleared EU direct dials they only pay for when the number is valid, from $17/month, about $0.35 per valid phone on Pro ($87 for 10,000 credits = 250 phones). Cognism is built for a different buyer — the enterprise that wants a giant browsable EMEA database and will sign an annual quote for it. Kaspr is the headline LinkedIn-extension route with stored-data caveats for SMB; RocketReach and SignalHire cover wide reach across roles and recruiting; Wiza handles Sales Navigator list exports; Apollo bundles the whole find-and-send suite; LeadMagic fits a code stack. Each owns a niche below. None is the better overall buy.
Why teams look for Lusha alternatives
Plenty of reps stay on Lusha's quick extension; the ones who leave usually cite three things. If your calling is mostly US/UK and you value the extension speed above all, Lusha can hold. If you dial into Europe, or you're tired of paying to reveal numbers that bounce, keep reading.
Conflict of interest disclosure
Let me be direct about the setup. Enrow finds and verifies phones and emails, this piece ranks phone finders, and I've ranked mine first — I own it, so weigh the rest accordingly. Now the limits, said out loud. Enrow isn't a searchable database; if you want to browse and filter millions of contacts by title and region, Cognism, Lusha, RocketReach and Apollo all give you that and we don't. We don't run outreach sequences either — Apollo does, and for cadences I'd send you to Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist. No technographics, no intent signals. Those are boundaries we drew on purpose, and I won't pretend the database tools secretly resell our data or that we quietly match everything they ship.
Where I won't budge is the narrow thing Enrow is built to do well: return the freshest, most accurate emails and phones, and stop there. Need a browsable database, a sequencer, or one suite that does it all? A tool below suits you better and I'll happily point you at it. But if the job is a European direct dial that actually connects, sourced legally and charged only when it's real, that focus is exactly why Enrow exists.
The 8 best Lusha alternatives
1. Enrow
#1

The tool I built because I was tired of paying to reveal numbers that turned out wrong.
The split with Lusha starts with where the number comes from. Lusha reveals a row from a stored database, a snapshot taken whenever that record was last touched. Enrow finds and verifies each direct dial in real time, on the spot, so you're not calling a number someone abandoned two carriers ago. That's not a marketing distinction; on a live European list it's the difference between a phone that rings the right desk and one that dead-ends. And Enrow holds the legal documentation to source EU mobile and direct-dial numbers, the exact geography where Lusha's accuracy slides.
Then there's what a phone costs. Lusha bills a reveal at 10 credits whether the number is good or not. Enrow prices a phone at 40 credits but charges only on a valid result, so a miss is free. Do the arithmetic and it lands in Enrow's favor: about $0.35 per valid phone on Pro ($87 for 10,000 credits = 250 phones), against Lusha's ~$1.25 per revealed number on Starter before you even haircut for the ones that bounce. You stop paying to find out a number is dead.
And there's the workflow edge nothing else here touches. From any LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, Enrow's Chrome extension exports the full verified contact, every field, email and direct dial included, straight into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click. No copy-paste. Lusha's extension reveals a number into its own panel; it doesn't drop a complete, verified contact card into your CRM the way this does.
One more, for the AI-agent crowd. Enrow ships an official MCP server and API (the repo is github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp), so you can call the email finder, verifier and Direct Phone Finder straight from Claude, Cursor or Windsurf. Fresh, verified phones pulled into an agent workflow, still pay-per-valid. Small thing today. Handy if you're building.
Emails come off the same engine. Enrow runs 10+ verification checks on every address, multiple SMTP passes and catch-all checks across servers in different regions, before it counts as valid, and catch-alls get delivered rather than flagged "risky" and dropped. On my live send bounce sat under 1% (observed average, not a contractual promise) and discovery ran around 60% on a mixed list.
- +GDPR-cleared EU direct dials, found and verified in real time, with the legal documentation held for the European numbers
- +Pay only for a valid result; a bounced or dead number never costs a credit
- +10+ verification checks per email; catch-all verified and delivered, not dropped
- +The Chrome extension exports the full verified contact, every field, from a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile into your CRM in one click (no rival here does this)
- +Native CRM integrations: Clay, HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, plus webhooks, a strong API and an official MCP server
- +Credit rollover on Pro and Scale; no per-seat fees, and unlimited team members on Pro and Scale
- –No searchable database, and that's the design. A stored list goes stale, so you end up dialing people who already moved on; Enrow fetches and checks each number live, which is why the hit rate holds up. Source your lists in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
- –No outreach sequencing, and it's not coming. Run your cadences in Emelia first, then La Growth Machine, then lemlist.
- –No technographics or intent data. You get LinkedIn-level company detail, nothing on tech stacks or buying signals.

Three subscription tiers. Start from $17/mo (1,000 credits, monthly only) and $47 for 4,000. Pro from $87/mo (10,000 credits), $167 for 20,000, $247 for 30,000. Scale from $397/mo (50,000 credits) up to $1,397 for 200,000. Take annual on Pro or Scale and roughly 10% comes off, so 10,000 lands near $78/mo and 50,000 near $357/mo. The credit math: 1 email is 1 credit, a phone is 40, verification 0.25, catch-all folded in, and the meter only moves on a valid result. That puts a 10,000-credit plan at 10,000 emails or 250 phones. Balances roll over on Pro and Scale. Free: 50 credits every month, no card.
Because a credit only spends on a valid result, the sticker is the real cost. The cleaner comparison base is Pro: $87 for 10,000 credits, meaning 10,000 valid emails at about $0.0087 each or 250 valid phones at about $0.35 each. Start remains the smaller $17 entry tier. Hold the phone number, because every tool below either bills to reveal a number that may bounce, gates phones behind a pricier tier, or gets unreliable in Europe, and that's where the gap opens.
Don't take my word for the phone numbers — feed Enrow a slice of your own dial list and watch what validates. 50 free credits, refreshed every month, no card.
2. Cognism

Built for a different buyer: the enterprise that wants a browsable EMEA database.
Cognism is the tool built for the exact weakness in Lusha's phone story: compliant, verified EMEA mobile data at scale. Its Diamond Data set is human-verified cell numbers, and Diamonds on Demand lets their research team source and verify a number on request. Where Lusha's European accuracy slides, Cognism is the strongest database answer, with real GDPR and CCPA processes behind it. For a large sales org dialing across the UK, DACH and the Nordics, that compliance and phone verification is the reason it wins deals.
The cost of that is exactly what you'd expect: it's an enterprise database, sold annual and by quote. Third-party estimates put it at a ~$15K-25K/year platform fee plus roughly $1,500-2,500 per seat/year, so a typical 5-seat team lands around $22,500/year and up, with the Elevate tier well into five figures. There's no self-serve free tier, no light monthly plan, and you're buying seats and a data package, not a pay-per-valid meter. And it's still a stored database, so a share of records drift out of date.
Credit where it's due: Cognism's phone-verified mobiles were the best database phones I tested, and across EMEA they connected. Then the split with Enrow. Cognism is a large compliant database you commit to annually; Enrow fetches and checks each number live and only charges when it's valid, no seat math, a $17 floor. Different shapes. A browsable EMEA database at enterprise scale is Cognism's turf. Fresh numbers billed strictly per valid result, with full-contact export straight to your CRM, is Enrow's.
- +Phone-verified mobile numbers (Diamond Data), the strongest compliant phone set I tested
- +Genuine GDPR/CCPA processes, strong for EMEA outreach
- +Large database with intent data and sequencing add-ons
- +Diamonds on Demand can source a specific number on request
- –Enterprise pricing only, by quote; a typical 5-seat deal is estimated around $22,500/year and up
- –No self-serve free tier or light monthly plan; you buy seats and a package
- –Still a stored database, so a share of records go stale

Cognism pricing. Custom only, billed annually, by quote. Third-party estimates put it at a ~$15K-25K/year platform fee plus ~$1,500-2,500 per seat/year; a typical 5-user Standard (Grow) deal runs around $22,500/year and Pro (Elevate) $37,500+ (estimates, not published list prices — verify against your own quote). There's no published per-credit or per-phone rate, so the real cost per phone depends entirely on your negotiated data allowance.
Because Cognism sells a seat-and-package deal rather than a per-result meter, there's no clean $/valid-phone to publish; it hinges on how many numbers your contract actually allows and how many connect. Its Diamond mobiles are phone-verified, which lifts the connect rate above a raw reveal tool, but it's still a database, so some rows age. On a mid-market Grow deal at ~$22,500/year for a small team, the effective cost per usable mobile is comfortably above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark once you divide the annual fee by realistic monthly volume (verify against your allowance).
vs Enrow: Cognism wins raw EMEA database depth and human-verified mobiles at enterprise scale. Enrow finds each number in real time and bills only on a valid result, with no annual commitment, no seat fees, a $17 floor, and one-click full-contact CRM export Cognism doesn't match. For most teams that don't need a giant browsable database, Enrow is far cheaper per valid phone.
3. Lusha

The tool this article is measured against, so here it is on its own terms.
Lusha does one thing quickly: you're on a LinkedIn profile, you click the extension, and it reveals a work email and often a direct dial or mobile from its database. That speed is real, and it's why reps like it. The database is broad, the integrations into HubSpot, Salesforce and Pipedrive are there, and the free tier lets a new user try it without a card. For US and UK calling, a lot of the numbers land.
Two things eventually push callers out: the phone economics and the freshness. In 2026 Lusha doubled the phone reveal from 5 to 10 credits, so the credit counts on the pricing page divide by ten the moment you're dialing. A 400-credit Starter plan is about 40 phones a month. Every revealed number is a stored row that may be stale, and Lusha's ~85-90% accuracy is a US/UK/Canada figure, weaker across continental Europe and APAC per practitioner reports. You pay to reveal whether the number is good or not.
Honestly, for a US rep who wants a number in two clicks, Lusha is fine, and I'd say so. The trouble is the parts that matter most to a European caller. Enrow finds and verifies each EU direct dial in real time, holds the legal documentation for it, and bills only when the number is valid, so a dead line is free. Same two-click speed from the extension, and it drops the whole verified contact into your CRM instead of just revealing a number into a panel.
- +Fast, well-designed browser extension; a number in two clicks
- +Broad B2B database with solid US/UK/Canada coverage
- +Native HubSpot, Salesforce and Pipedrive integrations
- +Free tier with no card
- –Phone reveals cost 10 credits each (doubled from 5 in 2026), so real phone volume is a tenth of the headline credits
- –Stored-database rows go stale; you pay to reveal whether the number is valid or not
- –Accuracy slides outside the US/UK/Canada, continental Europe and APAC especially

Lusha pricing. USD. Free $0 (40 credits/mo). Starter $49.90/mo, or $37.45/mo billed annually (400 credits/mo). Professional $69.90/mo, or $52.45/mo annual (600 credits/mo). Premium $399.90/mo, or $299.95/mo annual (3,400 credits/mo). Scale is custom, by quote. One credit reveals an email; a phone (direct dial/mobile) reveal costs 10 credits.
Now the real cost, and this is where Lusha's headline credits mislead. An email is 1 credit, so Starter's 400 credits is $49.90/400 = about $0.12 per email reveal. But a phone is 10 credits, so those same 400 credits buy just 40 phones at about $1.25 per revealed phone. And because Lusha bills to reveal a stored row whether it stays valid or not, a chunk you pay for are stale or wrong — worse across Europe. Apply a rough 50-70% deliverable rate (verify, and lower for continental EU) and the real number lands around $1.80-2.50 per valid phone, several times Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark. Professional's 600 credits work out to 60 phones at ~$1.17 sticker, and the same discount for dead rows applies.
vs Enrow: on real cost per valid phone Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark sits well under Lusha's ~$1.80-2.50 once you strip the reveals that bounce, because Enrow bills only on a valid number and Lusha charges to reveal a stored row regardless. Enrow also finds each number fresh in real time (no stale DB), holds documented EU direct-dial coverage where Lusha weakens, and exports the full contact to your CRM in one click. Lusha ships a browsable database Enrow doesn't; that's the trade.
4. Kaspr

The smaller-entry LinkedIn-extension pick, and a close cousin of Lusha.
Kaspr is a LinkedIn extension in the same mold as Lusha: land on a profile, reveal a phone and email from a database, push it to your CRM. It leans European in its data and has a smaller entry sticker than Lusha, which is its whole pitch before the stored-reveal haircut. For a small team that works LinkedIn and wants numbers without an enterprise contract, it's a simple headline-sticker entry, and the free plan (with an invite mechanic) gives you a handful of phone credits to try.
The limits echo Lusha's, only scaled down. It's a stored database, so numbers age and accuracy wobbles, and though it markets EU coverage, the verification depth trails a purpose-built phone engine. Credits and plan ceilings are modest, and heavy dialers outgrow it fast. And it's a reveal tool, so you pay whether the number connects or not.
A week in, the appeal was clear: the sticker looks light and the extension is quick, a sensible way for an SMB to try outbound calling. Then the ceiling. Enrow verifies each EU direct dial live with the legal documentation behind it, only charges on a valid number, and hands your CRM the full contact card instead of a single revealed field. Kaspr works if LinkedIn speed is the whole brief; for European numbers you can trust and pay for only when they're valid, Enrow is the sturdier pick.
- +Headline entry point, aimed squarely at SMB
- +Fast LinkedIn extension with EU-leaning data
- +Free plan with a few phone credits (via invite mechanic)
- +Native CRM and Zapier integrations
- –Stored database, so numbers age and accuracy varies
- –Reveal billing: you pay whether the number connects or not
- –Modest plan limits; heavy dialers outgrow it

Kaspr pricing. USD (Kaspr's own native USD, no conversion). Free plan includes 15 B2B email credits, 5 phone credits and 5 direct-email credits a month (invite three colleagues via gold invitations and B2B emails go "unlimited" — the same fair-use ceiling below still applies). Paid plans start at $65/month for the Starter tier ($49/mo billed annually), which carries about 100 phone credits/month on monthly billing; its "unlimited" B2B emails are in fact fair-use capped at 10,000 per account per month (kaspr.io/terms). Plans scale by credits and seats up to a custom Enterprise tier, and it's priced per seat, so there's no honest per-valid-email figure to fabricate. A phone reveal costs 1 credit.
Kaspr charges to reveal a stored row whether or not it connects. At the $65/mo Starter with about 100 phone credits, that's roughly $0.65 per revealed phone on the sticker (verify allowance). Some of those stored numbers are stale. Assume a rough 50-70% actually deliver (verify) and the real cost lands near $0.93-1.30 per valid phone. Per phone it's in Lusha's range, and you're carrying the same stale-row risk.
vs Enrow: Kaspr is the smaller-entry Lusha-style extension for SMB, but underneath it's the same stored database, billed the moment you reveal rather than when a number proves good. Enrow flips that: live-verified EU dials with the legal paperwork behind them, and you're charged only on the ones that are valid, then the whole verified contact drops into your CRM in a click. Occasional sticker-price reveals? Kaspr. EU phones you can trust and only pay for when they land? Enrow.
5. RocketReach

Worth a look if database breadth matters more to you than EU phone precision.
RocketReach is a wide contact database, strong on reach: it covers a huge range of people and roles, and each lookup can return an email, a phone or a full profile. For teams that need to reach beyond a narrow ICP, sourcing across functions and geographies, that breadth is the draw, and the entry sticker is only a sticker. Where Lusha is extension-first, RocketReach is more of a database-and-lookup tool you also drive from a browser add-on.
Where it gives ground is phones and freshness. They're gated, and the data underneath is a stored database. The sticker-price Essentials tier is email-only; you need Pro at $119/user/month (or $75/mo billed annually) for phone numbers, and it's per-user. Reviews flag data-accuracy variance, and like every database here, the mobile data is only as fresh as the last time it was updated. There's no EU-specific compliance story to match Cognism or Enrow.
The reach did impress me — RocketReach surfaced people other tools missed. The calling test told the other half of the story: a share of the mobiles were off, and nothing speaks to legally-sourced EU numbers. Enrow trades breadth for freshness: it won't surface as many people cold, but the direct dials it returns are verified live, EU-documented, and billed only when valid. Use RocketReach for reach; for numbers that actually ring in Europe, Enrow.
- +Very broad database, strong reach across roles and geographies
- +One lookup returns email, phone or full profile
- +Headline entry sticker for email-only use
- +Mature integrations and API on higher tiers
- –Phones gated to Pro ($119/user/mo, $75/mo annual); Essentials is email-only
- –Per-user billing; annual plans trade metered lookups for unlimited lookups + capped yearly exports
- –Stored database, accuracy varies; no EU compliance story

RocketReach pricing. USD, per user. Essentials (email only) $69/mo, or $33/mo billed annually ($399/yr). Pro (phones included) $119/mo, or $75/mo annual ($899/yr). Ultimate $209/mo, or $142/mo annual ($1,699/yr, full API). On monthly billing you get a fixed pool of lookups (Essentials 100/mo, Pro 250/mo, Ultimate 1,000/mo); on annual billing lookups go unlimited under fair use but exports are capped per year (Pro 3,600 exports/yr). Free tier: 5 lookups/month. Each lookup burns one credit whether it returns an email, a phone or nothing at all — you're billed for the attempt, not the phone found, which is the detail the sticker quietly hides.
Here's where the sticker misleads, and it's a double penalty. RocketReach bills per lookup attempt, not per phone found, so on monthly Pro that $119 buys 250 tries — $0.48 a try — but a try only surfaces a phone some of the time. RocketReach sits in no public find-rate benchmark, so I'll assume a ~30% phone hit rate and say so plainly: run all 250 lookups chasing mobiles and you surface roughly 75 numbers, which is about $1.59 per phone found, not $0.48. That's penalty one — you pay for every attempt and most come back empty. Penalty two: the monthly pool doesn't roll over, so ~22% of what you buy across a year evaporates unused (÷0.78), dragging it to about $2 per usable phone — and that's before you strip the stored, US-leaning rows that don't ring. You pay a lot, for not many numbers, and a share of the few you get are dead. Annual eases it because lookups go unlimited (so extra attempts stop costing money) against a 3,600-exports/year cap — about 300 phones a month, roughly $0.25 per exported phone, landing near $0.36-0.50 per valid phone after the connect haircut. Compare like for like: Enrow on annual Pro runs about $0.31 per valid phone, under RocketReach's annual and a fraction of its monthly, and Enrow never bills you for the attempts that find nothing or the numbers that bounce.
vs Enrow: RocketReach wins raw reach and a smaller email-only entry. On the number that decides a phone budget it doesn't: Enrow's ~$0.31 annual-Pro rate undercuts RocketReach's $0.36-0.50 annual and sits far under its ~$2 monthly, because Enrow bills only on a valid phone while RocketReach charges for every lookup attempt — most of which return no phone — then hands you stored rows that may not ring. Every Enrow dial is verified live and EU-documented rather than a stored US row with no compliance story, there's no per-seat lock-in, and the Chrome extension drops the whole verified contact into your CRM in one click.
6. SignalHire

Made for recruiters who want personal alongside work contacts.
SignalHire reveals full contact sets, work email, personal email and direct phone when it has them, which makes it a favorite with recruiters who need to reach candidates off-hours, not just at the office. Each credit reveals a contact, and it sells separate email and phone plans so you can size to your motion. For talent teams working candidates rather than B2B accounts, that personal-contact angle is something the pure sales tools don't emphasize.
The catch is that it's a stored-database reveal tool with the usual freshness and compliance caveats. The personal-data angle that helps recruiters also raises compliance questions for EU B2B use, and there's no GDPR direct-dial story like Cognism's or Enrow's. Accuracy varies by region as with every database here.
I found it useful precisely where it's aimed, recruiting, where a personal mobile beats a switchboard. For B2B sales into Europe it's the wrong shape. Enrow is built for compliant B2B direct dials, verified in real time and billed only when valid, with the EU documentation held. If you're sourcing candidates, SignalHire's personal contacts have a place; if you're a sales team dialing European buyers, Enrow is the compliant, fresher choice.
- +Returns work + personal emails and phone in one reveal
- +Popular with recruiters for off-hours candidate contact
- +Separate email and phone plans to size the spend
- +Browser extension and API
- –Stored-database reveal; freshness and regional accuracy vary
- –Personal-data angle raises EU B2B compliance questions
- –No GDPR direct-dial story; regional phone accuracy varies

SignalHire pricing. USD. Free: 5 credits at signup, 10 free credits a month with the extension. Entry paid plans run $69/mo monthly ($57/mo billed annually): an email plan (1,000 credits/mo), a phone plan (about 435 credits/mo), or a combined Emails & Phones plan at $139/mo ($110/mo annual, 900 combined credits/mo). Annual-only "Unlimited" tiers exist with a 2,000-credit/mo fair-use cap. Higher tiers scale credits and add seats up to a custom enterprise plan. API/Bulk is priced per credit, roughly $0.04-0.10 (verify). One credit reveals a contact, and a credit deducts only if at least one email or phone comes back.
On the phone plan, $69/mo for about 435 phone credits works out to roughly $0.16 per revealed phone on the sticker (verify current allowance). But that sticker is doing a lot of hiding. These are stored rows, so a chunk won't connect. And the numbers come from a personal-data source, which for European B2B dialing isn't a compliance grey area so much as a wall: a large share of what you reveal you can't legally use to call a buyer. Price only the revealed phones you can actually dial and the real B2B cost climbs well past the $0.16 headline, on data with no GDPR direct-dial basis at all. Set that against Enrow on annual Pro at about $0.31 per valid phone, every one compliant, verified live, and yours to call, and the recruiter-tool sticker stops looking affordable. The API/Bulk per-credit rates help at scale, but the freshness and compliance caveats don't move.
vs Enrow: SignalHire's edge is personal contacts for recruiting; that's a different job, and a fair one. For compliant B2B direct dials it's the wrong shape: Enrow verifies each number live, holds the EU documentation, bills only on valid, and one-clicks the full verified contact into your CRM — none of which a recruiter-flavored reveal on personal data can match.
7. Wiza

This one earns its place if your day is bulk-exporting Sales Navigator lists.
Wiza is built around Sales Navigator: run a search, and Wiza turns the result into an exportable list with emails and, on the right plan, phone numbers. For a team that sources in Sales Nav and wants to bulk-export enriched lists into a sequencer or CRM, that's a clean, specific job, and Wiza does it well. It's more of a list-export engine than a per-profile reveal extension.
The rub is that phones cost more and freshness is database-bound. The base plan is email-only at $83/user/month; phone numbers require the next tier at $166/user/month, per user. It enriches against stored data, so mobile accuracy varies, and there's no EU direct-dial compliance story. It's a fine scraper-and-exporter, not a verification engine.
Where it shone for me was exactly the bulk Sales Nav export, fast and tidy. Where it fell short was the phones, both cost and reliability, and the lack of any EU compliance angle. Enrow's Chrome extension works the single-profile path (full verified contact into your CRM in one click), and its API/bulk flow handles volume, with real-time verification and EU-documented dials, billed only on valid. For list scraping Wiza is purpose-built; for verified phones you pay for only when valid, Enrow.
- +Purpose-built for Sales Navigator list scraping and export
- +Clean bulk enrichment into CRM and sequencers
- +Straightforward per-user pricing
- +Good for turning a Sales Nav search into an outreach list fast
- –Phones require the $166/user/mo tier; base plan is email-only
- –Stored-data enrichment, so mobile accuracy varies
- –No EU direct-dial compliance story; per-user billing

Wiza pricing. USD, per user. Email-only plans start around $83/user/mo (annual, unlimited under fair use); phone numbers require the next tier at about $166/user/mo (verify current credit allowances live). Free tier gives 20 email credits and 5 phone credits. Credits deduct on export/reveal against stored data, and phone overage runs about $0.35 each.
Because phones only start at ~$166/user/mo, the clearest anchor is the overage rate: about $0.35 per revealed phone. That's a reveal against stored data. Knock off the ones that won't connect, roughly half to two-thirds surviving (verify), and the real cost lands near $0.50-0.70 per valid phone (verify), stacked on top of the per-user email tier you're already paying. Multiply that seat by a team and you're buying a phone premium before a single number even connects.
vs Enrow: Wiza is the Sales Nav bulk-export specialist; Enrow is the verification-and-phone engine that runs after it. No per-seat premium on the phones, no stored rows: each number is fetched and checked live, EU-documented, and billed only when it comes back valid, then exported as a full verified contact in one click. So use Wiza to build the list, and let Enrow verify and phone-enrich it.
8. Apollo

The one to buy if you want the whole find-and-send suite, phones included.
Apollo pairs a huge B2B database with sequencing, enrichment, a Chrome extension and a dialer, all on one seat-based subscription. Against Lusha it's a broader play: not just reveal-a-number, but source, sequence and call from one tab. For a team that wants everything in one place and treats phones as one feature among many, that consolidation is the appeal, and the free tier is generous.
The cost of that breadth is freshness and how the credits work. Apollo is a stored database, so a share of records sit stale, and every phone reveal draws 8 credits from a shared per-seat pool, 2,500 credits a month on Basic, with add-on credits from about $0.025 each (roughly $0.20 a phone). A team that dials hard burns that pool on mobiles faster than the email use suggests. Export caps and data-accuracy gripes are the two things you'll read most in the reviews. It's a workflow tool where the data is a component, not the point.
To Apollo's credit, getting from a filter to a live call inside one tool is quick. Then I checked the mobiles against a live dial, and both the per-seat ration and the stored-data staleness showed. Enrow fetches and verifies each number live, returns EU direct dials Apollo's database doesn't reliably cover, and only bills on valid, with no per-seat math. Apollo is the suite; let Enrow feed it the clean phone layer underneath.
- +Large B2B database with sequencing, enrichment and a dialer in one place
- +Chrome extension and CRM integrations
- +Generous free tier (900 credits/year per seat)
- +One tool to source, enrich, sequence and call
- –Stored database, so data ages and accuracy is a common complaint
- –Phones draw 8 credits each from a shared per-seat pool (2,500/mo on Basic) that expires monthly with no rollover; add-on credits from ~$0.20 a phone
- –Export caps and data-quality gripes recur in reviews

Apollo pricing. USD, per seat, one unified credit pool. Free $0 (75 credits/seat/mo = 900/year). Basic $65/seat/mo, or $49/seat/mo billed annually (2,500 credits/mo, 30,000/year on annual). Professional $99/seat/mo, or $79 annual (4,000 credits/mo). Organization $149/seat/mo card price, $119 annual (6,000 credits/mo, minimum 3 seats). Enterprise custom. A phone reveal costs 8 credits; add-on credits run about $0.025 down to $0.015 each in volume. Plan credits expire at the end of the billing cycle, no rollover.
Apollo's emails run 1 credit each from the shared pool, but the credits expire at the end of each cycle — no rollover, so unused ones are simply lost. Model that honestly (lists finish, reps go quiet, roughly 78% of what you pay for actually gets used) and a nominal $0.026/credit ($65 ÷ 2,500) becomes about $0.033 per valid email — roughly 2x Enrow Start and 3.8x Pro — before a phone enters the picture. And it's per seat: a 5-rep team pays $325/mo for five separate pools that each expire. The number that really bites is phones, at 8 credits a reveal. Basic's 2,500 credits a month per seat is about 312 phones if you spend the whole pool on mobiles, so about $0.21 per revealed phone on the sticker (nearer $0.16 on annual Basic), or about $0.20 a phone buying add-on credits — and the same no-rollover waste means even that understates. That sticker only flatters Apollo while you're dialing the US. It's stored-database data, US-leaning, with no EU direct-dial documentation, and the shared pool drains fast once an active dialer leans on 8-credit phones. On a continental-Europe list, where a large share of those stored mobiles are stale, wrong or unusable, the real cost per valid EU phone climbs well past the sticker — above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark per valid phone, not under it — because Enrow charges you nothing for the dead ones Apollo bills you to reveal, and nothing for the credits you never spend.
vs Enrow: Apollo is the all-in-one; Enrow is the phone-and-data layer. Apollo raw phone ratio is a stored US-leaning row with no EU documentation, drawn from a shared pool a heavy dialer drains mid-cycle, so on a European list its real cost per valid phone runs above Enrow's once you strip the ones that don't connect. Enrow's real-time data is verified live, EU-documented, and charged only on a valid result with no per-seat fees. Different jobs, so run both if you want the suite and the clean numbers.
9. LeadMagic

For the case where your "tool" is really a pipeline.
LeadMagic is API-shaped: 15+ enrichment endpoints (email, mobile, company, profile, job-change) drawing from a single shared credit pool, plus a CLI and an MCP server for AI-agent workflows. Credits deduct only on successful results, which is the right default. Against Lusha's clickable extension, LeadMagic is the mirror image: endpoints you script against. Its niche is RevOps and developers who'd sooner write a script than reveal numbers one profile at a time.
Two things to know: it's an API, not a product you'd hand a rep, and the EU phone story isn't published. Mobiles cost 5 credits each, pay-per-valid, but EU/GDPR phone coverage isn't documented, so European reliability is a question mark (verify). Non-developers will stall on it, and rollover only kicks in above the entry Basic plan.
I gave it a week of pipeline runs. The shared pool keeps the accounting honest and pay-per-valid is the right call. But it's plumbing, not something a caller opens. Enrow's API is just as scriptable and its MCP server pulls verified data into Claude or Cursor, and on top of that ships a real UI and a Chrome extension a rep can drive, plus EU direct dials with the legal documentation behind them. Programmable, without making everyone a developer.
- +Pay-per-valid; zero charge on a failed match
- +15+ endpoints from one shared credit pool, mobile finder included
- +Developer tooling: API, CLI/TUI, MCP server
- +Clean, tidy credit accounting
- –No rollover on the entry Basic plan
- –Mobiles cost 5x an email; no published EU/GDPR phone coverage (verify)
- –It's an API, not a browsable UI, so non-developers will struggle

LeadMagic pricing. USD: Basic $49/mo (2,000 credits; $490/yr). Essential $99/mo (5,000; rollover starts here). Growth $249/mo (20,000). Professional $499/mo (50,000). Ultimate $849/mo (100,000). Enterprise custom. Email Finder 1 credit, Mobile Finder 5, Email Validation 0.25. Credits deduct only on a successful result.
Pay-per-valid means the sticker is close to the real cost — for a US mobile, and with one caveat even before geography. The entry Basic plan has no rollover, so credits you don't spend each month are gone; budget the honest ~78% utilization and the effective cost runs about 28% over the raw figure (rollover only starts on Essential and up). Phones are 5 credits each, so Basic's 2,000 credits buy 400 mobiles at roughly $0.12 on a raw-credit basis on paper. But that headline hides the catch. LeadMagic publishes no EU/GDPR phone coverage (verify), so on a European list you can't know which of those sticker-price mobiles are legally sourced or even connect, and a dead or unusable EU number at $0.12 bought you nothing at all. Once you count only the EU dials you can actually and legally place, the real cost per usable EU phone isn't the $0.12 sticker — it's a multiple of it. Enrow's phones are documented EU direct dials, verified live, priced from about $0.35 down to $0.31 on annual Pro, every one yours to call. On the number that decides an EU phone budget, that's the real like-for-like, and Enrow comes out ahead.
vs Enrow: both are pay-per-valid and both ship real APIs and MCP servers. LeadMagic phone ratio is a different credit unit, and it's an undocumented-EU number; Enrow's are documented EU direct dials verified in real time, and Enrow adds a rep-friendly UI and one-click full-contact CRM export LeadMagic's endpoints don't. A pure code pipeline is LeadMagic's job; verified EU phones a whole team can use is Enrow's.
Don't take my word for the phone numbers — feed Enrow a slice of your own dial list and watch what validates. 50 free credits, refreshed every month, no card.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Final verdict
On the one job that decides a phone budget, a direct dial that rings, sourced legally in Europe, paid for only when it's valid, Enrow takes it. Lusha reveals a stored row at 10 credits a phone whether it connects or not, and the accuracy thins out precisely where a lot of teams dial: continental Europe. Enrow fetches and verifies each number live, holds the legal documentation for EU dials, and bills only on a valid result, so at Pro it's about $0.35 per valid phone against Lusha's ~$1.80-2.50 once you strip out the reveals that bounce. And the piece no other tool here can copy: the Chrome extension moves the full verified contact, every field, email and direct dial, from a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click. Now the honest limits. Enrow isn't a searchable database, so if browsing and filtering millions of contacts is the point, Cognism, Lusha and RocketReach do that and Enrow doesn't — Cognism most of all, if you're an enterprise that wants the deepest compliant EMEA database and will pay enterprise money for it. Enrow doesn't sequence or dial in-app, and it carries no technographics or intent data. Focus by design, not holes. But when the job is a verified phone that connects and an email that lands, charged only when it's real, that narrow focus is exactly what Enrow was built to win.
Don't take my word for the phone numbers — feed Enrow a slice of your own dial list and watch what validates. 50 free credits, refreshed every month, no card.
Everything you need to know
What is the best Lusha alternative for EU phone numbers?
How much does a phone number cost on Lusha vs Enrow?
Is Lusha's phone data accurate?
Does Lusha have a free plan?
Why do people switch from Lusha?
Can I export a full contact from LinkedIn into my CRM with Lusha?
How we evaluated these tools
No affiliate links here, and no sponsor had a hand in the ranking. One test list, every tool, the same week. I scored the four things that actually set a phone budget: how many usable direct dials each tool returned, how many of those connected instead of bouncing when I dialed them live, the real cost per valid phone rather than the sticker or the raw credit count, and geographic coverage — legally-sourced EU direct dials most of all, since that's where Lusha thins out. Competitor pricing and features come from each tool's official pages, checked on 2026-07-02; anything I couldn't confirm live is marked "verify."
¿listo para dejar de perder el tiempo?
Conectado en minutos.
Data verificada en segundos.
sin tarjeta
sin configuración