13 Best LeadMagic Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026

Converted from EUR (≈ EUR × 1.20): Start ~$44/mo (€37), Grow ~$116/mo (€97), Scale ~$356/mo (€297), Agence custom from ~$719/mo (€599, verify). A standalone email-warmup add-on runs ~$23/mo (€19) for the first mailbox. Email-finder credits come via an add-on rather than the base plan; per-plan credit allowances vary, confirm live (verify). Free: 7-day trial.

On the real cost, Emelia bills a finder credit only on an email it actually returns, so the meter is honest, same bucket as Enrow and LeadMagic. But because the finder credits ride an add-on rather than the base plan, there's no clean base-plan $/valid-email to quote here (verify the current add-on rate); price it on the add-on, not the seat. Phones are thin, so there's no dependable $/valid-phone to compute.

vs Enrow: Emelia is a sender with a finder attached; Enrow is the data layer you'd feed it. Both bill only on a valid email, so neither hides cost in bounces — but for the data itself (match rate, EU phones, a clean $0.017/valid-email meter on the base plan, one-click full-contact CRM export) Enrow wins, and pairs cleanly with Emelia for sending.

Hunter charges the same figure in $ and € (Starter €49 = $49, taken 1:1 in USD). Free $0 (50 credits/mo); Starter $49/mo ($34/mo annual, 2,000 credits/mo); Growth $149/mo ($104/mo annual, 10,000 credits/mo); Scale $299/mo ($209/mo annual, 25,000 credits/mo); Enterprise custom.

Now the real cost, and it's a long way from the sticker. Hunter bills on the search attempt, not the valid email it hands back, so $49 for 2,000 searches is $0.0245 per attempted lookup — not per contact found. Two penalties stack from there. First, only about a third of lookups return an address at all (~32.5% on the public 20,000-contact finder benchmark), so you're paying roughly 3x the sticker before a single send: $0.0245 ÷ 0.325 ≈ $0.075 per address found. Second, about 11% of what does come back bounces, so haircut again — $0.075 ÷ 0.888 ≈ $0.085 — and because Starter's credits reset every month with no rollover, an honest utilization adjustment (÷0.78) lands the real figure near $0.109 per deliverable valid email. That's about 6.4x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and roughly 12.5x its $0.0087 at Pro. You pay for every attempt, most come back empty, and part of the rest is dead on arrival. Hunter returns no phone numbers at all, so there's no $/valid-phone to compute, which is the hole if you dial.

vs Enrow: once you account for the searches that return nothing and the addresses that bounce, Hunter's real cost per deliverable email lands near $0.109 — about 6.4x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and roughly 12.5x its $0.0087 at Pro. Hunter also has no phones at all, weaker validation (guessed addresses bounce, where Enrow runs 10+ checks), no real-time freshness, and no one-click full-contact CRM export. Enrow bills only on a valid result: a miss costs nothing and a bounce costs nothing, so its sticker is its real price.

Subscription (USD, per user): Free $0 (100 credits/mo); Starter $49/mo (2,000 credits); Growth $99/mo (5,000); Pro $249/mo (15,000); Enterprise custom (verify — the pricing page is JS-gated to a direct fetch). Mobiles cost 10 credits each.

Prospeo bills only on an email it actually returns — a miss doesn't spend a credit — so its sticker is close to its real cost. Starter's $49/2,000 is about $0.0245 per valid email, and Growth is $0.020 at $99/5,000, so at the same 1,000-email band Prospeo runs about 1.6x Enrow's $0.017 on Start. Its find rate is middling, but that costs you reach, not money: the lookups that come back empty aren't billed, they just leave contacts unfound, so you get fewer emails for the spend rather than a padded invoice. Phones are the other snag. Each mobile is 10 credits, so Starter's 2,000-credit pool covers 200 phone reveals at a nominal $0.25 each — but Prospeo documents no EU coverage and its phone-data quality is unstated (verify), and a number you can't count on in Europe isn't the same purchase as a verified EU direct dial you can.

vs Enrow: both bill only on a valid email, so the honest gap is the sticker itself — Prospeo's entry Starter runs about 1.6x Enrow ($0.0245 vs $0.017 at the same 1,000-email band on Start), and its lower find rate costs you contacts, not extra dollars. Enrow charges strictly on a valid result, holds documented EU phone coverage Prospeo doesn't, rolls credits over on Pro and Scale, and drops the full contact into your CRM in one click. Prospeo's per-user pricing also stacks up fast on a team.

Native USD pricing (no EUR conversion needed): Standard $29/mo (400 credits), $49/mo (1,000), $89/mo (2,000); Scale $149/mo (5,000), $199/mo (10,000); Ultimate $299/mo (25,000), $499/mo (50,000), $799/mo (100,000). Annual billing roughly halves the monthly rate. A verified email find costs 1 credit, charged only when found (Decision-Maker searches cost 2).

Because it's charged only on a verified email and each standard find is 1 credit, the real math is honest: $29 for 400 credits is 400 verified emails at about $0.073 per valid email on the small Standard tier, dropping toward $0.01 at the 100,000-credit volume ($799/100,000). No phones at all, so there's no $/valid-phone to compute.

vs Enrow: the meter is just as honest, but it's email-only and the small tiers run pricier per valid email than Enrow's $0.017. Enrow adds GDPR-cleared EU phones, real-time data, and a one-click full-contact CRM export for a comparable entry price.

Subscription (USD): Trial $0 (50 credits); Starter $39/mo (1,000 credits; ~$29/mo annual); Pro S $99/mo (5,000; ~$74/mo annual); Pro M $189/mo (20,000); Pro L $369/mo (50,000); Ultra $738/mo (100,000+). Annual billing -25%. Phone and data enrichment is a separate token add-on (roughly $0.02 per token); LinkedIn automation runs about $69/mo per account slot.

The sticker reads cheap — $39 for 1,000 credits is about $0.039 a credit — but Snov spends a credit on the search itself, not on a deliverable email, so the number badly understates the real cost. Snov isn't in the public finder benchmark, so I'll assume the category-default find rate of about 30% (an assumption, not a measured Snov figure): if only around a third of searches return a usable address, you pay roughly 3x the sticker before sending anything — $0.039 ÷ 0.30 ≈ $0.13 per email found. Then the stored rows that do come back age and bounce, and Starter's credits reset monthly with no rollover, so the real deliverable cost climbs further still — several multiples of Enrow's $0.017. That's the double penalty: you pay for every attempt and only a fraction land, then part of what lands is dead. Phones sit outside the plan entirely: a separate $0.02 token add-on with no EU direct-dial story, so no honest $/valid-phone comes out of it.

vs Enrow: on real cost per valid email Enrow's $0.017 sits far under Snov's ~$0.13-plus once you account for the searches that return nothing and the stale rows that bounce, and Enrow finds each contact fresh in real time (no stale DB), bills only on a valid result, and adds GDPR-cleared EU phones plus a one-click full-contact CRM export none of Snov's breadth replaces. Snov bundles a sender and a database Enrow doesn't; that's the trade.

Subscription (USD, per user): Free $0 (15 email / 5 phone credits/mo); Starter $49/mo annual ($65/mo monthly; "unlimited" B2B emails under a 10,000/account/month fair-use cap, 100 phone credits/mo); Business $79/mo annual ($99/mo monthly; 200 phone + 200 direct-email credits/mo); Enterprise custom (verify exact tiers). Annual saves ~25%.

On the real cost, the "unlimited emails" are fair-use capped at 10,000 per account per month (kaspr.io/terms) and are generic company addresses drawn from a stored database, so there's no honest $/valid-email to quote (they aren't verified personal work emails, and it's a per-seat plan, not a per-credit meter). Phones are the meter that matters. Comparing like for like against Enrow's monthly Start, Kaspr's Starter runs $65/mo month-to-month for 100 phone credits, so about $0.65 per phone reveal — right alongside Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, and only dipping to ~$0.49 if you commit to annual. Even at that lower figure, these are database reveals: no strict valid-only guarantee, no rollover, and a credit is spent whether or not the number still connects (verify). That's a different purchase from Enrow charging only when a valid number lands.

vs Enrow: Kaspr grabs one contact fast; Enrow files whole verified contacts in bulk. Enrow adds 10+ verification checks, strict pay-per-valid billing on both emails and phones, and a one-click full-contact CRM export Kaspr doesn't offer.

Subscription (USD, per seat): Free $0 (40 credits/mo); Starter ~$49.90/mo (~400 credits; ~$37.45/mo annual); Professional ~$69.90/mo (~600; ~$52.45/mo annual); Premium ~$399.90/mo (~3,400; ~$299.95/mo annual); Scale custom (verify exact counts). Annual billing ~25% cheaper.

On the real cost, a credit reveals one stored contact (email or phone) rather than paying only on a validated hit, so it's per-reveal, not pay-per-valid. Starter's ~400 credits at ~$49.90 comes to about $0.12 per reveal — but some fraction of those reveals are stale rows that bounce or numbers that no longer ring. Assume 50-70% are usable (verify) and the cost per contact you can actually reach drifts up to $0.18-0.25, a blended figure since emails and phones both draw the one pool. Credits don't roll over.

vs Enrow: Lusha sells a stored database with per-seat fees and per-reveal credits. Enrow finds fresh in real time, bills only on a valid result, covers EU dials legally, and files the full verified contact into your CRM in one click.

Subscription (USD): Free $0 (5 emails/phones/exports a day); Email $49/mo (unlimited emails, 300 exports/mo; ~$39/mo annual); Email + Phone $99/mo (unlimited emails and phones, 600 exports/mo; ~$79/mo annual); Team/API custom. A regional "exclude US/UK" 50%-off coverage toggle drops those to $25/$49 monthly. The $99/$199 you may see are strikethrough anchors, not the charged price (verify).

On the real cost, the binding meter is exports, not verified results: the Email plan's 300 exports/mo at ~$39/mo annual comes to about $0.13 per exported contact. But these are stored-database rows, and a portion arrive stale and bounce — figure 50-70% deliverable (verify) and the real cost slides toward $0.19-0.26, with no valid-only guarantee behind any of it. Per-export off a database, not pay-per-valid.

vs Enrow: ContactOut is a recruiter's export list priced per export off a stored DB. Enrow is a sales data layer: fresh work emails and EU direct dials, billed only when valid, filed into your CRM in one click.

Subscription (USD, per seat): Free $0 (limited credits); Basic $65/user/mo month-to-month (~$49 on annual) for 2,500 unified credits per seat — an email costs 1 credit, a mobile 8 — with no rollover, so unused credits die each month; Professional ~$79/user/mo and Organization ~$119/user/mo (min 3 seats) add more credits per seat (verify); Enterprise custom. Pricing page is JS-gated to a direct fetch (verify). The link is Apollo's pricing.

On the real cost, Basic's $65/mo buys 2,500 unified credits per seat at about $0.026 a credit, and an email is 1 credit. But the credits don't roll over — whatever you don't burn each month is gone — so on an honest utilization basis (you rarely spend the whole allowance, and there's usually a dead month a year) the effective rate lands near $0.033 per valid email, about 2x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and 3.8x its $0.0087 at Pro. Say that waste out loud: you're pre-paying for credits you'll partly forfeit. And it's per seat, so a five-rep team is at $325/mo before anyone dials. Mobiles cost 8 credits each — roughly $0.21 on a raw-credit basis — but they're stored, US-leaning numbers with no GDPR EU direct-dial product behind them, so don't let that raw figure flatter it against a verified EU direct dial.

vs Enrow: Apollo sells breadth over freshness — a stored database with per-seat fees and a unified-credit meter that expires monthly. On real cost per valid email Enrow's $0.017 at Start undercuts Apollo's ~$0.033 (about 2x), its real-time data beats a stored DB on a live send, and its mobiles are GDPR-cleared EU direct dials where Apollo's are stored, US-leaning numbers. No per-seat fees either — Enrow is from $17/month total, not per rep — plus the one-click full-contact CRM export none of these match.

No public pricing. Two tiers (Standard, Pro), both quote-based. Reported ~$15,000-$25,000/yr depending on tier, annual contract, per-seat plus a base fee. Confirm with sales (verify).

On the real cost, there's no honest per-contact figure to compute: the pricing is quote-based, credits are annual-contract allotments, and it's a stored database, so a share of even verified mobiles drift out of date before the next refresh. At a reported ~$15,000/yr floor, the per-contact cost only approaches Enrow's territory at very high, committed volume — and only if the data holds fresh, which a stored DB doesn't guarantee.

vs Enrow: Cognism matches Enrow on EU phone coverage but charges five figures a year for a stored database with no published per-contact rate. Enrow delivers real-time, GDPR-cleared EU dials from $17/month, billed only on a valid result, with a one-click full-contact CRM export.

Findymail now runs a single self-serve plan (Starter) priced by a credit slider from $49/mo (1,000 finder credits) up to $849/mo (100,000 credits); the headline tier is $99/mo for 5,000 finder credits plus 5,000 bonus verifier credits (~$83/mo on annual billing, two months free), with a custom Enterprise tier above. The trial is 10 credits, no card. Unused credits carry forward up to 2x the monthly allowance. Its separate Datacare CRM enrichment product starts around $500/mo.

Because a credit only spends on an email Findymail actually returns, its sticker is close to its real cost — but you have to compare the same volume as Enrow, not Findymail's bigger tier against Enrow's entry. The slider floor is $49 for 1,000 finder credits, or about $0.049 per valid email — roughly 2.9x Enrow's $0.017 at that same 1,000-email band. The $99/5,000 headline tier works out to about $0.0198, and only at 100,000 credits ($849) does Findymail come down near Enrow's per-email cost. So at the volumes most teams actually buy, Findymail is the pricier meter, not a match. Phones run 10 credits apiece, so a 5,000-credit pool nominally buys 500 phones at $0.20 on a raw-credit basis — except Findymail returns no EU mobiles (GDPR shuts that door), which makes the per-phone figure moot for any European list.

vs Enrow: at matched volume Findymail runs well above Enrow — about 2.9x at the 1,000-email entry ($0.049 vs $0.017) — and only converges toward Enrow's cost at 100k. Both meters bill on results, so neither hides cost in bounces, but the price gap runs in Enrow's favour at every tier a normal team buys. Coverage is where they truly split: Enrow returns GDPR-cleared EU phones Findymail simply can't, delivers catch-alls instead of dropping them, and files the whole contact into your CRM in one click. Enrow's door is also $17 for a 1,000-email plan against Findymail's $49 floor for the same 1,000 credits.

Converted to USD (EUR + 20%). Dropcontact's rollover-plan ladder opens at €29/mo (~$35) for 500 credits, then €59/mo (~$71) for 1,500, €89/mo (~$107) for 4,000, €189/mo (~$227) for 11,000, and climbs to €1,349/mo (~$1,619) for 100,000; Enterprise is custom above that. Annual is roughly 20% cheaper per tier. Dropcontact runs a pay-on-success model, so unused credits are re-credited when an email isn't found, but 1 credit is consumed per email found.

On real cost, pay-on-success keeps the meter fair, but the entry is dearer than it looks: ~$35 buys only 500 credits, so about $0.070 per valid email — roughly 4.1x Enrow's $0.017 at that entry, the steepest near-peer here. It eases with volume (~$71/1,500 is about $0.047, and the 100,000-credit tier lands near $0.016, still about 2x Enrow at the same volume), but because Dropcontact is an enrichment engine rather than a bulk finder, that price stings most at the low volumes it's actually bought for. There's no genuine $/valid-phone to state here, since its numbers come only from scraping email signatures, not a direct-dial product.

vs Enrow: Dropcontact cleans French records well but barely does phones, and its entry cost per valid email runs about 4x Enrow's — and stays roughly 2x even at high volume. It's also EU-firmographics-first with no US focus. Enrow finds and verifies in real time the same way, adds GDPR-cleared EU direct dials with the legal docs behind them, covers the US, and files the full contact into your CRM.