wiza alternatives
9 Best Wiza Alternatives for Finding Direct Dials in 2026
This isn't a knock on the product. Wiza holds about 4.5/5 across 1,100+ reviews on G2, and it earned that with a clean LinkedIn workflow and strong email accuracy. The point is narrower: a phone number is only worth anything if it rings the right person, and a stored-database reveal can't promise that the way a real-time finder can. A database that ages. Thin phone coverage. No EU direct-dial documentation. And the tools that get you past all three.
9 tools tested
updated July 2, 2026
13 min read
Wiza reveals emails and phones off a stored B2B database, aimed at a US team that lives inside LinkedIn. The emails are strong. The phones wobble: stored reveals go stale, so a chunk of the mobiles are wrong (user reviews peg accuracy around 55-65%, verify), coverage runs thin, and there's no documented legal basis for EU direct dials.
Need a number that rings the right desk? For most teams the best Wiza alternative is Enrow. It finds direct dials in real time for the US and for Europe, where it holds the GDPR documentation to source EU mobiles, and bills 40 credits per phone only when the number comes back valid. That's about $0.35 per valid phone on Pro ($87 for 10,000 credits = 250 phones), with Start as the $17 entry tier. No valid number, no charge.
One thing here is Enrow's alone. Its Chrome extension lifts the entire verified contact off a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, every field, and drops it into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive with one click. Enrow is #1. The eight tools below each own a narrow niche, and none is the better overall buy for phones.
The alternatives at a glance
Enrow is the best overall Wiza alternative for teams that want direct dials that actually connect, EU included, and want to pay only for valid numbers, from $17/month, about $0.35 per valid phone on Pro ($87 for 10,000 credits = 250 phones), with Start as the $17 entry tier. Cognism is built for a different buyer, the enterprise that wants a huge phone-verified database and has the annual budget for one; Lusha and Kaspr win fast mobiles with headline stickers and coverage caveats (Kaspr leans EU, Lusha US); RocketReach and SignalHire win broad per-credit lookups with headline stickers and costly misses; Apollo if you want the all-in-one suite. Each owns a clear niche below, and none is the better overall buy on phones.
Why teams look for Wiza alternatives
Wiza is a fine LinkedIn capture tool for a US rep, yet people still leave, and it usually comes down to three things. If your whole motion is US LinkedIn capture and you rarely dial Europe, Wiza can hold. If it isn't, keep reading.
Conflict of interest disclosure
Let me put the bias on the table. Enrow is my company, it's a phone-and-email data tool, this piece ranks phone finders, and I've ranked mine first. So weigh what follows accordingly. And here's the part I won't dodge: there are whole categories Enrow simply doesn't cover. No searchable, filterable database, the kind Cognism, Lusha and Apollo ship by the millions of rows, so if the job is browsing and building a list from stored data, they win that and we don't. No outreach sequences and no dialer, which is Apollo's turf; for sending you'd bolt Enrow onto Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist. No technographics. None of that is an oversight. We'd sooner find and verify a fresh contact on the spot than hand you back a stored row that may already be stale.
Where I'll plant a flag is the single thing Enrow is built to do well: pull the freshest, most accurate emails and direct-dial phones, verify them, and stop there. Want a browsable database, a built-in sequencer, or one suite that does everything? A tool below suits you better, and I'll say so. But if the whole point is a phone number that rings the right person, that tight focus is exactly why Enrow exists.
The 9 best Wiza alternatives
1. Enrow
#1
I built this after one too many dialing days spent paying for numbers that turned out dead, misrouted, or attached to someone who'd already moved on.
The split with Wiza is clean, and it starts with where the phone number comes from. Wiza reveals a mobile from a stored database, so its age is whatever the last refresh left behind. Enrow finds the number in real time, at the moment you ask, then only charges you if it comes back valid. That difference is the whole game on phones. You stop paying for dead lines, and you stop dialing a number that was correct for someone's last job. On my test list, the French and German mobiles reached the person I actually meant to call, not a general line or a predecessor's old handset.
Then there's the gap Wiza never really closes: Europe. Wiza's phone data leans US, and nothing documents how it sources EU numbers legally. Enrow returns direct dials for the US, and it's built to do the harder half too, European mobile and direct-dial numbers we can source GDPR-cleared with the paperwork on file. For a team calling into France, Germany or the Nordics, that's the difference between a compliant dial and a legal headache. On emails, Enrow runs 10+ verification checks before an address counts, multiple SMTP passes and catch-all checks across servers in different regions, and it delivers catch-all addresses instead of flagging them "risky" and dropping them.
And there's a workflow edge nothing else here touches. From any LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, Enrow's Chrome extension exports the full verified contact, every field, email and phone included, straight into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click. No copy-paste. No half-filled record. Wiza captures profiles into a list you then export; it doesn't drop a complete, verified contact card into your CRM the way this does.
One more thing, for the AI-agent crowd. Enrow ships an official MCP server (the repo is github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp), so you can call the email finder, verifier and direct-phone finder straight from Claude, Cursor or Windsurf. Fresh, verified emails and phones pulled into an agent workflow, still pay-per-valid. Small thing today. Handy if you're building.
Then the live send. Bounce sat under 1%, discovery ran around 60% on a mixed list, and the phones connected. One caution, to be straight: that sub-1% is an observed average, not a contract.
- +Real-time direct dials for the US and EU, GDPR documentation held for the European ones (Wiza's phones are stored-database reveals that age)
- +Pay only for a valid phone; a dead or missing number never costs a credit
- +10+ verification checks per email; catch-all verified and delivered, not dropped
- +Native CRM integrations: Clay, HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, plus webhooks, and an API that's a pleasure to build on
- +The Chrome extension exports the full verified contact, every field, from a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile into your CRM in one click (no rival on this list does this)
- +Credit rollover on Pro and Scale; no per-seat fees, with unlimited team members on Pro and Scale
- –No searchable database, and that's a deliberate call. A stored list drifts out of date, so you end up dialing someone who changed roles two quarters ago. Enrow looks each contact up the moment you ask, which is why the hit is usually more accurate. To build the list in the first place, work from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
- –No outreach sequencing and no dialer, and we're not going to bolt them on. Send the actual sending to Emelia first, then La Growth Machine, then lemlist.
- –No technographics. You get LinkedIn-level company detail, not a read on anyone's tech stack.
Subscription in three tiers. Start from $17/mo (1,000 credits, monthly only) and $47 for 4,000. Pro from $87/mo (10,000 credits), $167 for 20,000, $247 for 30,000. Scale from $397/mo (50,000 credits) up to $1,397 for 200,000. Knock about 10% off the Pro and Scale monthly rate if you pay annually, which drops 10,000 to roughly $78/mo and 50,000 to roughly $357/mo. The credit map is short: 1 email spends 1 credit, a phone spends 40, a standalone verification 0.25, catch-all is baked in, and nothing is billed unless the result comes back valid. Put differently, 10,000 credits is 10,000 emails or 250 phones. Balances roll forward on Pro and Scale. And the free tier reloads: 50 credits land in the account every month, no card.
Because a credit only spends on a valid result, the sticker is the real cost. The cleaner comparison base is Pro: $87 for 10,000 credits, meaning 10,000 valid emails at about $0.0087 each or 250 valid phones at about $0.35 each. Scale drops further, and Start remains the smaller $17 entry tier. Hold the Pro phone number, because every tool below either reveals from a database (haircut the sticker for the dead numbers) or meters phones separately, and that's where the gap opens up.
Don't take my word for the phone quality, put a slice of your own list through it. 50 free credits land every month, no card, enough to pull a real EU or US direct dial and call it.
2. Cognism
For enterprise teams that want a huge phone database and can fund it.
Cognism is the phone-data heavyweight. A large B2B database, strong European coverage, and its calling card, "Diamond Data," a set of mobiles a human team has actually phone-verified. Next to Wiza, this is a different weight class: Wiza captures off LinkedIn one profile at a time, Cognism hands you a filterable database with millions of numbers and a compliance layer built for enterprise. For a team that needs volume and can pay for it, the phone accuracy is a clear step up from a plain reveal tool.
Then the catch, which is how you buy it. Cognism is annual, seat-based, and quote-only, so there's no $49 entry and no paying by the phone. You buy a platform, and the real cost per number depends entirely on how many you actually pull against the contract. It's still a stored database, so outside the phone-verified subset, records age like any other. And it's aimed at teams, not a solo rep.
Here's my read. On phone-verified mobiles at scale, Cognism's Diamond Data is a real accuracy story, no argument. But you commit to an annual seat contract to reach it, and the freshness outside that subset is the usual stored-database question. Enrow finds each number live, bills only on a valid one with no seat minimum, and covers EU direct dials with the legal documentation behind them, no annual commitment to find out whether it fits your list.
- +Large B2B database with strong European coverage
- +"Diamond Data" phone-verified mobiles, a real accuracy edge
- +Enterprise compliance layer (GDPR, CCPA, DNC screening)
- +Intent data and integrations for larger teams
- –Annual, seat-based, quote-only, no headline entry sticker and no pay-per-phone
- –Still a stored database outside the phone-verified subset, so records age
- –Built for teams, overkill for a solo rep or small shop
Cognism pricing is quote-only. There's no public per-plan price; it's an annual, seat-based contract, typically a platform fee plus per-seat licensing, and public estimates put entry deals in the low-to-mid five figures a year (verify with sales). Phone-verified "Diamond Data" is a premium tier within that.
On real cost, there's no clean $/valid-phone to publish because it's a bundled annual contract, not a per-number meter. The effective cost per phone is the contract total divided by how many numbers you pull, which only works out at real volume. The phone-verified subset is more likely to connect than a generic database reveal (that's the point of it), but the rest of the records drift the same way any stored list does once the last refresh is a few months back.
vs Enrow: Cognism is the enterprise database with the best phone-verification story here; Enrow is the real-time finder you pay by the valid number. Enrow has no seat minimum, no annual lock-in, opens at $17, and returns fresh EU direct dials billed only when valid, $0.35 on Pro ($87 for 10,000 credits = 250 phones), so you can prove the phone quality on a real list before committing a cent. Different buys: a platform contract versus pay-per-valid data.
3. Lusha
Fast US mobiles with a headline sticker and coverage caveats, revealed without leaving the browser tab.
Lusha is the reveal tool a lot of reps already have pinned. Open a LinkedIn profile, hit the extension, get a mobile and an email. Like Wiza it works off a stored database, but its extension is smoother and its US mobile coverage is a real strength. The niche is clear: a rep who wants a number in two clicks without leaving the tab, mostly for US calling.
Two problems stack up: the stored-database freshness, and a credit model that adds up. Lusha's numbers age like any stored data, EU coverage is thinner and comes with the usual compliance questions, and the per-credit reveal cost climbs once you're past the free trickle. A revealed number that's dead still burns a credit. Reviews are consistently mixed on how many mobiles actually connect (verify).
When I pulled a batch of US mobiles through the extension, the speed held up and a decent share connected. Both true. But it's a stored database, so a slice of the reveals were stale, and I found no documented EU direct-dial story anywhere in the product. Enrow finds each number live, delivers EU direct dials with the legal documentation behind them, and bills only when the number is valid, so a dead reveal never costs you.
- +Fast, popular Chrome extension for one-click reveals
- +Decent US mobile coverage
- +Simple to roll out to a sales team
- +CRM integrations and a usable free tier
- –Stored database, so a share of revealed mobiles are stale
- –EU coverage thinner, with compliance questions
- –Per-credit reveals get expensive at volume; a dead number still costs a credit
Lusha pricing. USD, per user, verified 2026-07-02. Free $0 (about 40 credits/month). Starter around $49.90/mo (400 credits/mo; cheaper on annual). Professional around $69.90/mo (600 credits/mo). Premium is the big tier at roughly $399.90/mo (3,400 credits/mo); Scale is custom. A phone reveal costs 10 credits and an email 1 credit, so phones burn the pool fast (verify current allowances, Lusha reshuffles tiers often).
On real cost, Lusha bills per reveal, not per verified connect, so haircut for the stale numbers. A phone reveal is 10 credits, so on Starter (400 credits for ~$49.90, about $0.12 per credit) a single phone reveal runs near $1.25 at sticker. Apply a rough 55-70% mobile-accuracy rate (verify) and the real cost lands around $1.80-2.30 per valid phone, well above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, and that's on US numbers of mixed freshness with no documented EU direct dials. The one-click extension really is fast, but a reveal that rings nowhere still spends the credits.
vs Enrow: once phone reveals cost 10 credits apiece and you strip the dead numbers, Lusha's real cost per valid mobile sits above Enrow's, and it's a stored US-leaning database with no documented EU direct-dial story. Enrow works the other way: real-time lookups, EU numbers backed by held documentation, and a charge only when the phone is valid, so a reveal that rings nowhere never bills you. It also does the one-click full-contact CRM export Lusha's extension can't.
4. Kaspr
The headline entry point for European mobiles off LinkedIn.
Kaspr (owned by Cognism) is a LinkedIn-first reveal tool with a stronger European tilt than most. Open a profile, get a phone and an email, at a lower price than its parent. Against Wiza, the draw is EU coverage at a headline monthly price, where Wiza leans US. Its niche is a European SDR who wants mobiles off LinkedIn without an enterprise contract.
The trade is data depth and the usual database freshness. Kaspr pulls from a stored database, so accuracy on mobiles is variable, and its coverage is best on LinkedIn-active profiles. Credits are metered per reveal and the sticker-price plans are capped, so heavy dialing pushes you up the tiers fast. GDPR compliance is claimed, though as with any reveal tool the documentation is what matters (verify).
I tested it on a French and DACH sample, and for the price the EU hit rate was fair, better than Wiza on European reach at this tier. But it's still a database reveal, so freshness was the open question, and a dead number spent a credit all the same. Enrow finds EU direct dials in real time with the legal documentation held, and bills only when the number is valid, so you're not paying for the misses.
- +Stronger European mobile coverage than most reveal tools
- +Headline monthly entry, LinkedIn Chrome extension
- +Emails and phones from one extension
- +GDPR compliance claimed, backed by Cognism's data
- –Stored database, so mobile freshness is variable
- –Coverage best on LinkedIn-active profiles; thin elsewhere
- –Per-reveal credits, capped sticker-price plans; a dead number still costs one
Kaspr pricing. Published natively in USD, verified 2026-07-02. Free (15 email + 5 phone credits/mo). Starter $65/mo on the month-to-month plan per user, with roughly 100 phone credits/month and B2B email Kaspr markets as "unlimited" but caps under fair use at 10,000 emails per account per month (kaspr.io/terms); paying annually brings the effective monthly rate down to about $49. Business $99/mo with ~200 phone credits/month; Organization is custom (verify exact per-tier counts).
On real cost, Kaspr meters per phone credit, not per verified connect. Starter's ~100 phone credits for $65/mo (month-to-month) works out near $0.65 per reveal; haircut at a rough 55-70% mobile accuracy (verify) and the real cost per valid European phone lands around $0.93-1.18, above Enrow's $0.35 on Pro, and that's on stored numbers whose freshness you can't see, versus Enrow's real-time EU direct dials with documentation held.
vs Enrow: Kaspr is an EU reveal tool with costly caveats; Enrow is a real-time EU finder billed on valid results. Kaspr's headline monthly price is only the starting sticker, but its phone credits are metered per reveal and you pay for dead numbers, so once you haircut for freshness the real cost per valid mobile lands above Enrow's $0.35 on Pro. Enrow sources each EU direct dial the moment you ask, keeps the legal paperwork behind those numbers, charges nothing on a miss, and pushes the whole contact into your CRM in a single click.
5. RocketReach
Best when you need reach and volume more than pinpoint mobiles.
RocketReach is a wide-net lookup tool: a large database of professionals, with emails and phone numbers, searchable by name, company or domain. Where Wiza is LinkedIn-capture-first, RocketReach is database-first, so it's built for pulling many contacts at once rather than working a Sales Navigator list profile by profile. Its niche is recruiters and researchers who need reach across regions and industries more than pinpoint phone accuracy.
Accuracy is exactly where the breadth costs you. It's a big stored database, so reach comes at the expense of freshness, and phone numbers in particular are hit or miss, reviews flag both stale mobiles and misses (verify). Lookups are metered, and phone lookups often cost more or sit on higher tiers. You pay for a lookup whether or not the number connects.
My read: great for casting a wide net, weaker when you need the specific mobile to be right. That's the trade with breadth. Enrow goes the other way, finds the specific number live and verifies it, covers EU direct dials RocketReach doesn't document, and bills only on a valid result, so reach doesn't come at the cost of paying for dead lines.
- +Very broad database across regions and roles
- +Email and phone lookups plus a bulk/API workflow
- +Good for high-volume research and list pulls
- +Integrations and a Chrome extension
- –Breadth over accuracy; phone numbers are hit or miss
- –Stored data ages; a lookup costs whether or not it connects
- –Phone lookups often gated to higher tiers
RocketReach pricing. USD, per user. Free (about 5 lookups/mo, email only). Essentials around $69/mo (email lookups). Pro around $119/mo (email + phone lookups). Ultimate around $209/mo (higher volume). Annual is cheaper; phone lookups sit on the paid tiers (verify current allowances).
On real cost, RocketReach bills per lookup: you spend the credit on the attempt, whether or not a number ever comes back. That's the double penalty every pay-per-search tool carries, and it's worth stating plainly. First, plenty of lookups return nothing at all. RocketReach publishes no find rate, so assume roughly 30% of lookups actually surface a usable number (that 30% is an explicit assumption, not a measured figure) — which already puts you at about 3x the sticker before you dial a soul. Second, a chunk of what does come back is stale, because it's a broad stored database with mobile accuracy on the lower end, roughly 50-65% (verify). Stack the two — pay for every attempt, then lose part of what returns — and the real cost per valid phone climbs well past Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, on a wide database with no documented EU direct-dial story, versus Enrow's real-time, EU-cleared numbers billed only on a valid result. The Pro tier around $119/mo is the entry point for phone lookups (verify current allowance). Reach is RocketReach's edge; per-valid phone cost is not.
vs Enrow: RocketReach wins breadth; Enrow wins whether the specific number is right. RocketReach reveals from a large stored database and charges per lookup regardless of connect — a lookup that returns nothing still costs you, and only a fraction of what does return is a live number; Enrow looks the number up in real time, backs its EU dials with documentation, and only spends a credit on a valid result. For dialing accuracy over sheer reach, Enrow is the tighter buy.
6. SignalHire
Per-credit reveals with costly misses, with phones sitting in the same pool.
SignalHire is a sticker-price contact finder: emails and phone numbers on a per-credit reveal model, with a browser extension and bulk search. Against Wiza, the pitch is simple: a lower-looking reveal sticker that includes phones without jumping to a phone-specific plan, before accuracy and EU coverage are priced in. Its niche is a small team or recruiter that accepts sticker-price stored reveals and the freshness trade-off.
Data quality and coverage are where the sticker-price trade shows. It's a stored-database reveal tool, so mobiles vary in accuracy and EU coverage is limited with no strong compliance documentation. Credits are consumed on reveal, so a dead number still costs one. The sticker is only the sticker, and you can feel where the trade comes from on a live dialing list (verify accuracy).
Honestly, for the price it's a reasonable way to get emails plus the occasional phone. But "headline per reveal" and "headline per number that connects" aren't the same thing once you haircut the stale ones. Enrow costs more per reveal on the sticker and gives you back a number that's found live, EU-cleared, and only billed when valid, which is the metric that matters when you're actually dialing.
- +Headline per-credit sticker, phones included in the credit pool
- +Browser extension and bulk search
- +Simple, headline entry for small teams
- +Email and phone from one tool
- –Stored-database reveals; mobile accuracy varies
- –Limited EU coverage, weak compliance documentation
- –A dead number still spends a credit
SignalHire pricing. USD, per user, credit-based, verified 2026-07-02. Free (about 5-10 credits). Paid plans open around $69/mo monthly (an emails bundle is ~1,000 credits; a phones bundle is ~435 credits; the combined email+phone bundle is $139/mo for ~900 credits), scaling the per-credit cost at higher volume; annual-only unlimited tiers run ~$63-$83/mo. A credit reveals a contact including phone where available. Annual is cheaper, around $57/mo (verify current tiers).
On real cost, reveals are metered regardless of connect, and SignalHire's data is on the weaker end, so the sticker flatters it badly. A phones bundle of ~435 credits for about $69/mo works out near $0.16 per reveal, but that headline only holds if the number connects. SignalHire runs a small, stale stored database, so mobile accuracy sits low, and once you haircut for the dead lines the real cost per valid phone climbs well past the sticker, into Enrow Pro territory rather than under it. And that still counts only US-style reveals: SignalHire has no EU direct-dial documentation, so on a Europe-touching list the compliant number simply isn't there at any price. At the ~435-reveal volume SignalHire meters here, the better Enrow comparison is Pro (about $0.35 per valid phone on the $87/10,000-credit plan), and Enrow returns a compliant, live-found number where SignalHire's sticker-price reveal buys a US-only guess of unknown freshness. Headline per reveal is not headline per number you can legally dial.
vs Enrow: SignalHire is the sticker-price per-reveal option; Enrow is the pay-per-valid one. On paper SignalHire's credits look attractive in isolation, but you pay for the dead ones and there's no EU direct-dial story. Enrow trades the headline sticker for a number found live, cleared for EU dialing with documentation held, billed only when it's valid, and dropped whole into your CRM in one click.
7. Apollo
For teams that want the whole outbound suite, not just a phone finder.
Apollo pairs a huge B2B database with sequencing, enrichment and a Chrome extension, all on one seat-based subscription, and it includes a ration of mobile credits. Where Wiza is a focused LinkedIn capture tool, Apollo is the whole outbound stack in one tab: source, enrich, sequence, dial. For a small team that wants one platform, that breadth is the draw, but the phone data is a component of the suite, not its main event, and that's where a dialing-focused team feels the trade.
Freshness is the soft spot, along with how stingily the mobiles are metered. Apollo is a stored database, so records age and you'll hit contacts who moved on. Mobiles draw from a shared per-seat credit pool at 8 credits each, so heavy dialing drains it fast, and overage is metered. The recurring reviews are about data accuracy and export caps.
Fair play to Apollo: getting from a filter to a live sequence without leaving the tool is quick. Then I checked the mobiles against a live dial, and real-time won. Enrow finds each number on the spot, delivers EU direct dials Apollo's database doesn't reliably cover, and bills only on valid with no per-seat math. Apollo is built for a different job, running the whole outbound stack in one tab; if that's what you're after, Enrow sits alongside it as the clean phone layer feeding the sequences.
- +Large database with sequencing and enrichment in one place
- +Chrome extension and CRM integrations
- +Mobile credits included in the subscription
- +One tool to source, enrich, sequence and dial
- –Stored database, so mobiles age and accuracy is a common complaint
- –Phones draw from a shared per-seat credit pool (8 credits per mobile) that doesn't roll over, so heavy dialing drains it fast and any credits a seat doesn't burn are lost
- –Export caps and data-quality gripes recur in reviews
Apollo pricing. USD, per seat. Billed annually: Free $0 (75 unified credits/seat/month). Basic $49/seat/mo (30,000 unified credits/seat/year, granted upfront). Professional $79/seat/mo (48,000/year). Organization $119/seat/mo (72,000/year, minimum 3 seats). Apollo runs one unified credit pool now — a mobile-phone reveal costs 8 credits, an email 1 (verified only). Monthly billing runs higher. Enterprise custom.
On real cost, the number that bites is that Apollo's unified credits don't roll over — whatever a seat doesn't burn is simply lost. On monthly billing a seat is $65 for 2,500 credits, about $0.026 a credit; model the waste honestly (lists finish, reps sit idle around holidays, so a seat burns maybe 78% of what it pays for) and that sticker becomes roughly $0.033 per valid email — about 2x Enrow Start and 3.8x Pro. A mobile costs 8 of those credits, so a revealed number runs near $0.26 at the effective rate before you touch accuracy; haircut the stored, US-leaning mobiles for the stale ones on a live dial and the real cost per valid connected mobile clears Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, steeper still once EU coverage matters (Apollo's mobiles carry no documented EU direct dials). And it's all per seat: you pay $49/seat/mo (annual) for every dialer whether they burn a credit or not, so a five-rep team funds five subscriptions, not one. Enrow, billed per valid phone at $0.35 on Pro ($87 for 10,000 credits = 250 phones), takes neither penalty — no expiring pool, no per-seat fee — and returns EU direct dials Apollo doesn't document.
vs Enrow: Apollo is the all-in-one; Enrow is the phone-and-email data layer. Apollo's mobiles clear $0.35 per valid connect once you price in the credits that expire unused (no rollover) and haircut the stale ones, and that's before the $49/seat/mo per dialer, on US-leaning data with no documented EU dials and a shared per-seat credit pool that phones drain fast, so the effective phone budget on Apollo balloons the moment you actually lean on phones. Enrow has no expiring pool to burn, no per-seat fee, real-time data that beats a stored DB on a live dial, and EU direct dials Apollo doesn't cover. Different jobs: Apollo runs the suite, Enrow supplies the phones the suite dials.
8. ContactOut
Made for recruiters chasing personal emails and mobiles off LinkedIn.
ContactOut is a LinkedIn-first reveal tool known for surfacing personal emails alongside work ones, plus phone numbers, from a large stored database. Like Wiza it lives in the LinkedIn tab, but it leans harder into personal contact data, which recruiters in particular value. Its niche is recruiting and talent sourcing, where a personal email or mobile often beats a work one.
The catch is the familiar one, sharpened. Stored data ages, phone accuracy is variable, and EU coverage carries compliance questions that surfacing personal data only makes louder. Pricing is per user and climbs, and phone/mobile reveals are metered. A revealed number that's wrong still costs you (verify accuracy and EU stance).
For recruiting, the personal-data angle is a real strength, I'll grant it. But for B2B dialing where you need the number to be current and compliantly sourced, it's a stored database like the rest. Enrow finds direct dials live, covers EU with the legal documentation held, and bills only when the number is valid, so you're paying for connects, not reveals.
- +Strong personal + work email coverage off LinkedIn
- +Phone numbers alongside emails
- +Popular Chrome extension for recruiters
- +Large database, good LinkedIn coverage
- –Stored database, so freshness and phone accuracy vary
- –EU/personal-data compliance questions
- –Per-user pricing climbs; metered phone reveals
ContactOut pricing. USD, per user. Free (a small handful of daily reveals). The paid ladder opens around $99/mo for the entry individual plan (a fixed monthly pool of email and phone reveals), then a higher Professional-style tier above it, then custom Team and Sales pricing for seats and API (verify exact per-tier reveal counts, ContactOut gates them by plan). Annual is cheaper than month-to-month. Phone and mobile reveals pull from the same monthly allowance as emails.
On real cost, ContactOut is priced per seat, not per credit, so there's no honest $/valid-phone to publish, its allowances are bundled monthly reveal pools that vary by tier (verify exact counts). Compare it model-to-model: a per-seat reveal pool off a stored database versus Enrow's pay-only-for-valid credits. Whatever the effective per-reveal rate, you still haircut it for a rough 55-70% mobile accuracy (verify) plus the reveals that surface a personal number with no compliant B2B-dial basis in the EU, and on stored data carrying personal-data compliance questions in Europe that leaves a legally-dialable B2B mobile costing more than Enrow's Pro rate, not less, versus Enrow's real-time EU-cleared direct dials with the documentation held. ContactOut's edge is recruiting-grade personal data, not dialing-grade B2B phone economics.
vs Enrow: ContactOut wins on personal-email sourcing for recruiters; Enrow wins on dialing-grade B2B phones. It's a stored database billed per reveal with EU compliance questions hanging over the personal data; Enrow pulls each number fresh, keeps the EU documentation on file, bills nothing on a miss, and sends the whole contact card into your CRM in one click.
9. Wiza
The tool this article is measured against.
Wiza is the baseline, so here it is on its own terms. A clean LinkedIn-first prospecting tool: from a profile or a Sales Navigator search it reveals work emails and phones, verifies the emails, and exports lists to your CRM or a CSV. For a US rep who prospects out of LinkedIn all day, the workflow is genuinely smooth, and the email accuracy is a real strength, reviewers regularly praise the match rate.
Then the phones. Wiza reveals mobiles from a stored database, so a share are stale or wrong, independent reviews put phone accuracy around 55-65% with coverage far below its email coverage, roughly 20-40% of contacts (verify). And nothing on the pricing page documents legally-sourced EU direct dials, so a Europe-heavy list runs into both an accuracy and a compliance question. The emails are the strong half; the phones are the softer one.
Wiza is built for one job: LinkedIn-native US prospecting where email carries the workflow and phones are a nice-to-have. On that narrow job it does fine. But the moment the phone becomes the point, the data going into your dialer is where it thins out, and a Europe-heavy list makes that worse. Enrow finds each number live, charges only on a valid one, delivers real EU direct dials with the documentation held, and drops the full verified contact into your CRM in one click, none of which Wiza matches on phones.
- +Clean LinkedIn and Sales Navigator capture workflow
- +Strong, well-reviewed email accuracy
- +Verifies emails before counting them (per-valid on emails)
- +CRM integrations and CSV export
- –Phones are stored-database reveals; accuracy around 55-65% (verify)
- –Phone coverage far below email coverage (~20-40% of contacts, verify)
- –No documented legally-sourced EU direct-dial story
Wiza pricing. USD, per user. Free $0 (20 valid emails + 5 phone numbers). Starter $49/mo (100 valid emails + 100 phone numbers/month; $0.15 per extra email, $0.35 per extra phone). Email $99/mo, or $990/year ($83/mo), with unlimited email reveals on annual and 500 emails/month on monthly, phones $0.35 each. Email + Phone $199/mo, or $1,990/year ($166/mo), unlimited emails and phones on annual (500/500 on monthly, plus 2,500 exports/month cap). Team is custom. Wiza bills per valid email revealed, so on emails the sticker is honest.
On real cost, phones are the story. Wiza charges $0.35 per phone number revealed, but that's per reveal, not per number that connects. Haircut at Wiza's own ~55-65% accuracy (verify) and the real cost per valid phone climbs to about $0.54-0.64 on the overage rate, and higher once you factor coverage gaps. On Starter, 100 phones for $49 (with emails bundled) works out around $0.49 per reveal at sticker, but again that's per reveal, so the real per-connect cost is higher. Emails are billed per valid, which is fair, but they are not affordable on a per-address basis: Wiza's monthly Email plan is $99 for 500 emails, about $0.20 per valid email, roughly 23x Enrow's $0.0087 Pro benchmark. Annual unlocks "unlimited" reveals, but that only pays back at real volume on a fixed seat.
vs Enrow: on emails both bill per valid, but Wiza's monthly Email plan works out near $0.20 per address, roughly 23x Enrow's $0.0087 Pro benchmark, so "per valid" does not make it affordable. On phones the gap is real: Wiza's $0.35 is per reveal off a stored database, so haircut for accuracy and the real cost per valid phone (~$0.54-0.64) sits above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, while Enrow's numbers are found live and cover EU direct dials with legal documentation Wiza doesn't have. Enrow also bills only when the number is valid and does the one-click full-contact CRM export Wiza doesn't.
Don't take my word for the phone quality, put a slice of your own list through it. 50 free credits land every month, no card, enough to pull a real EU or US direct dial and call it.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Final verdict
Boil it down to the job that matters here, a direct-dial phone that reaches the right person, Europe included, paid for only when it's valid, and Enrow is the pick. Wiza is a clean LinkedIn capture tool with strong emails, but its phones are stored-database reveals that user reviews put around 55-65% accurate, with coverage well below its email side (reviews suggest roughly 20-40% of contacts, verify), and there's no documented EU direct-dial story. Enrow sources each number in real time, covers the US and EU with the legal documentation held for the European ones, and charges only on a valid result, about $0.35 per valid phone on Pro ($87 for 10,000 credits = 250 phones). Then the part no tool on this list can match. The Chrome extension lifts the full verified contact, every field, email and phone, off a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile and into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click. Now the honest part. What Enrow won't do. It's not an all-in-one, and it has no searchable database, where Cognism, Lusha and Apollo do. So if the job is building a list from scratch, start in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator and let Enrow enrich what you pull. No sequencing, no dialer, no technographics either; those route to Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist. Cognism is the closest thing here to a browsable enterprise phone database, and if that's the shape of what you need it earns the look. But if what you need is a phone number that actually connects, and connects legally in Europe, that narrow focus is the whole job.
Don't take my word for the phone quality, put a slice of your own list through it. 50 free credits land every month, no card, enough to pull a real EU or US direct dial and call it.
Everything you need to know
What is the best free alternative to Wiza?
Why do people look for a Wiza alternative?
How accurate are Wiza's phone numbers?
Does Wiza find EU phone numbers, and is it GDPR-compliant?
How does Wiza pricing compare to Enrow?
Can I export Wiza contacts into my CRM?
How we evaluated these tools
No affiliate links here, and nobody paid to be ranked. One test list, run in a single week through every tool that offered self-serve access, with the quote-only, demo-gated platforms (Cognism) judged on their published pricing, documentation and independent reviews rather than a live run. Four things settled the order, and they're the four that actually move a dialing budget: how many real, usable phone numbers came back (match rate); how many of those rang a live desk instead of a dead line on an actual call; what a valid phone truly cost once you strip the per-reveal or sticker headline; and geographic coverage, with legally-sourced EU direct dials weighted heaviest. Competitor prices and features come off each tool's official pages, read on 2026-07-02; anything I couldn't confirm live carries a "verify" tag.
¿listo para dejar de perder el tiempo?
Conectado en minutos.
Data verificada en segundos.
sin tarjeta
sin configuración