10 Best Wiza Alternatives for Finding Direct Dials in 2026

For enterprise teams that want a huge phone database and can fund it.

Cognism is the phone-data heavyweight. A large B2B database, strong European coverage, and its calling card, "Diamond Data," a set of mobiles a human team has actually phone-verified.

Next to Wiza, this is a different weight class: Wiza captures off LinkedIn one profile at a time, Cognism hands you a filterable database with millions of numbers and a compliance layer built for enterprise.

For a team that needs volume and can pay for it, the phone accuracy is a clear step up from a plain reveal tool.

Then the catch, which is how you buy it. Cognism is annual, seat-based, and quote-only, so there's no $49 entry and no paying by the phone. You buy a platform, and the real cost per number depends entirely on how many you actually pull against the contract.

It's still a stored database, so outside the phone-verified subset, records age like any other. And it's aimed at teams, not a solo rep.

Here's my read. On phone-verified mobiles at scale, Cognism's Diamond Data is a real accuracy story, no argument. But you commit to an annual seat contract to reach it, and the freshness outside that subset is the usual stored-database question.

Enrow finds each number live, bills only on a valid one with no seat minimum, and covers EU direct dials with the legal documentation behind them, no annual commitment to find out whether it fits your list.

Ideal para: Phone-verified mobiles at enterprise scale

Preços

Cognism pricing is quote-only: an annual, seat-based contract, with public estimates putting entry deals in the low-to-mid five figures a year (verify with sales). There's no clean $/valid-phone, because you buy a bundled contract, not a per-number meter.

vs Enrow: Cognism is the enterprise database with the best phone-verification story here; Enrow is the real-time finder you pay by the valid number — no seat minimum, no annual lock-in, opening at $17 with EU direct dials at $0.35 on Pro. Prove the phone quality on a real list before committing a cent.

Fast US mobiles with a headline sticker and coverage caveats, revealed without leaving the browser tab.

Lusha is the reveal tool a lot of reps already have pinned. Open a LinkedIn profile, hit the extension, get a mobile and an email. Like Wiza it works off a stored database, but its extension is smoother and its US mobile coverage is a real strength.

The niche is clear: a rep who wants a number in two clicks without leaving the tab, mostly for US calling.

Two problems stack up: the stored-database freshness, and a credit model that adds up. Lusha's numbers age like any stored data, EU coverage is thinner and comes with the usual compliance questions, and the per-credit reveal cost climbs once you're past the free trickle.

A revealed number that's dead still burns a credit. Reviews are consistently mixed on how many mobiles actually connect (verify).

When I pulled a batch of US mobiles through the extension, the speed held up and a decent share connected. Both true. But it's a stored database, so a slice of the reveals were stale, and I found no documented EU direct-dial story anywhere in the product.

Enrow finds each number live, delivers EU direct dials with the legal documentation behind them, and bills only when the number is valid, so a dead reveal never costs you.

Ideal para: Quick US mobiles from a Chrome extension

Preços

Lusha pricing (USD, per user, verified 2026-07-02) starts free with about 40 credits/month, then Starter around $49.90/mo for 400 credits, where a phone reveal costs 10 credits. Lusha bills per reveal, not per connect, so haircut for the stale numbers: at a rough 55-70% mobile-accuracy rate (verify) the real cost lands around $1.80-2.30 per valid phone, well above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, on US-leaning numbers with no documented EU direct dials.

vs Enrow: strip the dead reveals and Lusha's real cost per valid mobile sits well above Enrow's, off a stored US-leaning database. Enrow does real-time lookups, EU numbers backed by held documentation, a charge only when the phone is valid, and the one-click full-contact CRM export Lusha's extension can't.

The headline entry point for European mobiles off LinkedIn.

Kaspr (owned by Cognism) is a LinkedIn-first reveal tool with a stronger European tilt than most. Open a profile, get a phone and an email, at a lower price than its parent. Against Wiza, the draw is EU coverage at a headline monthly price, where Wiza leans US.

Its niche is a European SDR who wants mobiles off LinkedIn without an enterprise contract.

The trade is data depth and the usual database freshness. Kaspr pulls from a stored database, so accuracy on mobiles is variable, and its coverage is best on LinkedIn-active profiles. Credits are metered per reveal and the sticker-price plans are capped, so heavy dialing pushes you up the tiers fast.

GDPR compliance is claimed, though as with any reveal tool the documentation is what matters (verify).

I tested it on a French and DACH sample, and for the price the EU hit rate was fair, better than Wiza on European reach at this tier. But it's still a database reveal, so freshness was the open question, and a dead number spent a credit all the same.

Enrow finds EU direct dials in real time with the legal documentation held, and bills only when the number is valid, so you're not paying for the misses.

Ideal para: EU/LinkedIn mobiles with costly caveats

Preços

Kaspr pricing (native USD, verified 2026-07-02) starts free (15 email + 5 phone credits/mo), then Starter $65/mo month-to-month per user with roughly 100 phone credits. Kaspr meters per reveal, not per connect: those ~100 credits work out near $0.65 a reveal, and at a rough 55-70% mobile accuracy (verify) the real cost per valid European phone lands around $0.93-1.18, above Enrow's $0.35 on Pro, on stored numbers whose freshness you can't see.

vs Enrow: Kaspr is an EU reveal tool with costly caveats; Enrow is a real-time EU finder billed on valid results. Enrow sources each direct dial the moment you ask, keeps the legal paperwork on file, charges nothing on a miss, and pushes the whole contact into your CRM in a single click.

Best when you need reach and volume more than pinpoint mobiles.

RocketReach is a wide-net lookup tool: a large database of professionals, with emails and phone numbers, searchable by name, company or domain. Where Wiza is LinkedIn-capture-first, RocketReach is database-first, so it's built for pulling many contacts at once rather than working a Sales Navigator list profile by profile.

Its niche is recruiters and researchers who need reach across regions and industries more than pinpoint phone accuracy.

Accuracy is exactly where the breadth costs you. It's a big stored database, so reach comes at the expense of freshness, and phone numbers in particular are hit or miss, reviews flag both stale mobiles and misses (verify).

Lookups are metered, and phone lookups often cost more or sit on higher tiers. You pay for a lookup whether or not the number connects.

My read: great for casting a wide net, weaker when you need the specific mobile to be right. That's the trade with breadth.

Enrow goes the other way, finds the specific number live and verifies it, covers EU direct dials RocketReach doesn't document, and bills only on a valid result, so reach doesn't come at the cost of paying for dead lines.

Ideal para: Broad email + phone lookups at volume

Preços

RocketReach pricing (USD, per user) starts free (about 5 lookups/mo, email only), Essentials around $69/mo for email lookups, with phone lookups sitting on the Pro tier around $119/mo (verify current allowances). It bills per lookup — you pay on the attempt whether or not a number comes back — so with no published find rate (assume ~30% surface a usable number) plus mobile accuracy around 50-65% (verify), the real cost per valid phone climbs well past Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, on a wide database with no documented EU direct-dial story.

vs Enrow: RocketReach wins breadth; Enrow wins whether the specific number is right — it looks each number up in real time, backs its EU dials with documentation, and only spends a credit on a valid result.

Per-credit reveals with costly misses, with phones sitting in the same pool.

SignalHire is a sticker-price contact finder: emails and phone numbers on a per-credit reveal model, with a browser extension and bulk search. Against Wiza, the pitch is simple: a lower-looking reveal sticker that includes phones without jumping to a phone-specific plan, before accuracy and EU coverage are priced in.

Its niche is a small team or recruiter that accepts sticker-price stored reveals and the freshness trade-off.

Data quality and coverage are where the sticker-price trade shows. It's a stored-database reveal tool, so mobiles vary in accuracy and EU coverage is limited with no strong compliance documentation. Credits are consumed on reveal, so a dead number still costs one.

The sticker is only the sticker, and you can feel where the trade comes from on a live dialing list (verify accuracy).

Honestly, for the price it's a reasonable way to get emails plus the occasional phone. But "headline per reveal" and "headline per number that connects" aren't the same thing once you haircut the stale ones.

Enrow costs more per reveal on the sticker and gives you back a number that's found live, EU-cleared, and only billed when valid, which is the metric that matters when you're actually dialing.

Ideal para: Per-credit email + phone reveals with costly misses

Preços

SignalHire pricing (USD, per user, credit-based, verified 2026-07-02) starts free (about 5-10 credits), with paid plans opening around $69/mo for a ~435-credit phones bundle — near $0.16 per reveal at sticker. But reveals are metered whether or not the number connects, and SignalHire's stored data sits on the weaker end, so haircut for the dead lines and the real cost per valid phone climbs into Enrow Pro territory rather than under it, with no EU direct-dial documentation at any price.

vs Enrow: SignalHire is the sticker-price per-reveal option; Enrow is the pay-per-valid one at about $0.35 per valid phone on Pro. Enrow's number is found live, cleared for EU dialing with documentation held, billed only when valid, and dropped whole into your CRM in one click.

For teams that want the whole outbound suite, not just a phone finder.

Apollo pairs a huge B2B database with sequencing, enrichment and a Chrome extension, all on one seat-based subscription, and it includes a ration of mobile credits. Where Wiza is a focused LinkedIn capture tool, Apollo is the whole outbound stack in one tab: source, enrich, sequence, dial.

For a small team that wants one platform, that breadth is the draw, but the phone data is a component of the suite, not its main event, and that's where a dialing-focused team feels the trade.

Freshness is the soft spot, along with how stingily the mobiles are metered. Apollo is a stored database, so records age and you'll hit contacts who moved on. Mobiles draw from a shared per-seat credit pool at 8 credits each, so heavy dialing drains it fast, and overage is metered.

The recurring reviews are about data accuracy and export caps.

Fair play to Apollo: getting from a filter to a live sequence without leaving the tool is quick. Then I checked the mobiles against a live dial, and real-time won.

Enrow finds each number on the spot, delivers EU direct dials Apollo's database doesn't reliably cover, and bills only on valid with no per-seat math.

Apollo is built for a different job, running the whole outbound stack in one tab; if that's what you're after, Enrow sits alongside it as the clean phone layer feeding the sequences.

Ideal para: All-in-one database + sequencer with mobiles

Preços

Apollo pricing (USD, per seat) opens at Basic $49/seat/mo annually on one unified credit pool, where a mobile reveal costs 8 credits and an email 1 (verified only). Those credits don't roll over — whatever a seat doesn't burn is lost — so haircut Apollo's stored, US-leaning mobiles for the stale ones on a live dial and the real cost per valid connected mobile clears Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, steeper once EU coverage matters (Apollo documents no EU direct dials), and you pay per seat whether a dialer burns a credit or not.

vs Enrow: Apollo is the all-in-one; Enrow is the phone-and-email data layer, billed per valid phone at $0.35 on Pro with no expiring pool and no per-seat fee, returning EU direct dials Apollo doesn't cover.

Made for recruiters chasing personal emails and mobiles off LinkedIn.

ContactOut is a LinkedIn-first reveal tool known for surfacing personal emails alongside work ones, plus phone numbers, from a large stored database. Like Wiza it lives in the LinkedIn tab, but it leans harder into personal contact data, which recruiters in particular value.

Its niche is recruiting and talent sourcing, where a personal email or mobile often beats a work one.

The catch is the familiar one, sharpened. Stored data ages, phone accuracy is variable, and EU coverage carries compliance questions that surfacing personal data only makes louder. Pricing is per user and climbs, and phone/mobile reveals are metered.

A revealed number that's wrong still costs you (verify accuracy and EU stance).

For recruiting, the personal-data angle is a real strength, I'll grant it. But for B2B dialing where you need the number to be current and compliantly sourced, it's a stored database like the rest.

Enrow finds direct dials live, covers EU with the legal documentation held, and bills only when the number is valid, so you're paying for connects, not reveals.

Ideal para: LinkedIn-first personal + work data

Preços

ContactOut pricing (USD, per user) is free for a small handful of daily reveals, with the paid ladder opening around $99/mo for a fixed monthly pool of email and phone reveals (verify exact per-tier counts). It's priced per seat off a stored database, not per valid result, so there's no honest $/valid-phone — and haircut for a rough 55-70% mobile accuracy (verify) plus the personal numbers with no compliant EU B2B-dial basis, and a legally-dialable EU mobile costs more than Enrow's Pro rate, not less.

vs Enrow: ContactOut wins on personal-email sourcing for recruiters; Enrow wins on dialing-grade B2B phones. Enrow pulls each number fresh, keeps the EU documentation on file, bills nothing on a miss, and sends the whole contact card into your CRM in one click.

Big claims on the data, big asterisks on the contract.

Seamless.AI markets itself as a "real-time" B2B search engine: search a company or a title, get emails and cell phones, work it from a Chrome extension. Next to Wiza, the pitch is the same LinkedIn-adjacent capture wrapped in a search UI and a much louder marketing voice.

Its niche is a US sales team that wants volume and a familiar in-browser reveal, and doesn't mind a sales call to buy it.

Two things bite. The "real-time" label sits on top of a stored index, and reviews are consistently rough on phone accuracy, with stale mobiles and wrong numbers showing up on live dials (verify). The commercial terms are the other headache: paid plans are quote-only and per-seat, the default is an annual contract users report is hard to exit, and the daily credit pool expires at midnight, so whatever you don't burn is gone.

One credit reveals a phone and an email together, so phones aren't metered on their own, and nothing in the product documents legally-sourced EU direct dials.

I ran a batch through it, and the extension was quick, no argument. But a slice of the mobiles were stale, the European numbers came with no compliance story, and the daily credits reset before I could touch the overflow.

Enrow finds each number live, bills only when it's valid with no seat minimum and no annual lock-in, covers EU direct dials with the documentation held, and never wipes your balance at midnight.

Ideal para: High-volume US email + mobile reveals, quote-only

Preços

Seamless.AI pricing (USD, per user) is free for 50 lifetime credits, then paid plans are quote-only and annual: the retired Basic tier ran about $147/mo billed yearly for 250 credits/mo, and Pro is sales-quoted with a roughly 5-seat minimum (about $79-150+ per user, verify). A credit reveals a phone and an email together, so there's no clean $/valid-phone, but haircut a stored index reviewers rate weak on mobiles (~50-65%, verify) and the real cost per valid European dial clears Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, on numbers with no documented EU compliance basis.

vs Enrow: Seamless.AI is the loud, quote-only search engine; Enrow is the quiet pay-per-valid finder. Enrow sources each number live, holds the EU paperwork, charges nothing on a miss or a dead line, and drops the full contact into your CRM in one click, with no annual lock-in and no midnight credit wipe.

The tool this article is measured against.

Wiza is the baseline, so here it is on its own terms. A clean LinkedIn-first prospecting tool: from a profile or a Sales Navigator search it reveals work emails and phones, verifies the emails, and exports lists to your CRM or a CSV.

For a US rep who prospects out of LinkedIn all day, the workflow is genuinely smooth, and the email accuracy is a real strength, reviewers regularly praise the match rate.

Then the phones. Wiza reveals mobiles from a stored database, so a share are stale or wrong, independent reviews put phone accuracy around 55-65% with coverage far below its email coverage, roughly 20-40% of contacts (verify).

And nothing on the pricing page documents legally-sourced EU direct dials, so a Europe-heavy list runs into both an accuracy and a compliance question. The emails are the strong half; the phones are the softer one.

Wiza is built for one job: LinkedIn-native US prospecting where email carries the workflow and phones are a nice-to-have. On that narrow job it does fine.

But the moment the phone becomes the point, the data going into your dialer is where it thins out, and a Europe-heavy list makes that worse.

Enrow finds each number live, charges only on a valid one, delivers real EU direct dials with the documentation held, and drops the full verified contact into your CRM in one click, none of which Wiza matches on phones.

Ideal para: LinkedIn-first email + phone reveals for reps

Preços

Wiza pricing (USD, per user) is free for 20 emails + 5 phones, then Starter $49/mo for 100 valid emails + 100 phone numbers ($0.35 per extra phone). Wiza bills per valid email, so on emails the sticker is honest — but its monthly Email plan runs about $0.20 per valid email, roughly 23x Enrow's $0.0087 Pro benchmark. On phones, that $0.35 is per reveal off a stored database, so haircut for Wiza's ~55-65% accuracy and the real cost per valid phone climbs to about $0.54-0.64, above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark.

vs Enrow: Wiza's numbers are stored-database reveals you pay for whether they connect or not; Enrow's are found live, cover EU direct dials with legal documentation Wiza doesn't have, bill only when valid, and export the full contact into your CRM in one click.