9 Best LeadIQ Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026

Prospeo pricing. USD, per user: Free $0 (100 credits/mo). Starter $49/mo (2,000 credits). Growth $99/mo (5,000). Pro $249/mo (15,000). Enterprise is custom. Annual grants all credits upfront (about 25% off, roughly $37/$74/$187 a month). A direct mobile number costs 10 credits.

Prospeo bills 1 credit per email found — a miss costs nothing — so its sticker is its real cost, not an understatement of it. Starter is $49/2,000 = about $0.0245 per valid email, and $99/5,000 = $0.0198 at Growth. That's 1.6x Enrow's $0.017 at matched entry volume, and it stays above Enrow up the ladder. Where Prospeo does cost you is reach, not money: its find rate trails Enrow's, so on the same list you come away with fewer contacts — but a search that returns nothing is free, so the misses never inflate your per-valid. Phones burn 10 credits each, so Starter's 2,000 credits net you 200 numbers at roughly $0.245 on a raw-credit basis, but Prospeo documents no EU coverage at all and doesn't publish its phone-data quality (verify). A headline sticker on numbers you can't lean on for a European dial list isn't the same purchase.

vs Enrow: at matched entry volume Prospeo's sticker sits above Enrow ($0.0245 against $0.017 on Start, 1.6x), and it stays there at every tier. Both bill only on a found result, so neither punishes a miss with a charge; the split is that Enrow verifies harder with 10+ checks, finds more of the list, delivers documented EU direct dials Prospeo doesn't, and rolls credits over on Pro and Scale. Prospeo's per-user pricing also stacks up fast on a team.

Hunter pricing. EUR, charged 1:1 in USD. Free $0 (50 credits/month). Starter $49/mo for 2,000 credits, or $34/mo billed annually. Growth $149/mo for 10,000 credits, or $104/mo annual. Scale $299/mo for 25,000 credits, or $209/mo annual. Enterprise is custom.

Now the real cost, and the sticker badly understates it. Hunter bills per attempted search, not per valid it finds. Starter is $49/2,000 = about $0.0245 per attempted search. On Dropcontact's public 20,000-contact benchmark Hunter returned an address on just 32.5% of lookups, so divide by that and you're at about $0.075 per address found. Then the second penalty: 11.2% of those bounce, the highest bounce rate on that benchmark, so divide by 0.888 and you reach about $0.085 per deliverable valid. Starter's credits reset monthly and don't roll over, and at a realistic ~78% utilization that lands the true figure near $0.109 per deliverable valid — roughly 3.5-4.5x Hunter's own sticker, about 6.4x Enrow Start ($0.017) and 12.5x Enrow Pro ($0.0087). The double penalty in plain words: you pay for every search, only about a third return anything, and better than one in nine of that bounces. You pay a lot, for not much, and part of the little you get is dead. And Hunter returns no phone numbers at all, so there's no $/phone to compute, which is a hole if you dial.

vs Enrow: on real cost per deliverable valid Hunter runs about 6.4x Enrow Start and 12.5x Pro ($0.109 against $0.017 and $0.0087), because you pay for every search, only a third find anything, and part of that bounces. Hunter also has no phone numbers at all, weaker validation where Enrow runs 10+ checks, no real-time freshness, and no one-click full-contact CRM export. Enrow bills only on a valid result, so a miss and a bounce both cost you nothing.

LeadMagic pricing. USD: Basic $49/mo (2,000 credits; $490/yr). Essential $99/mo (5,000; rollover starts here). Growth $249/mo (20,000). Professional $499/mo (50,000). Ultimate $849/mo (100,000). Enterprise custom. Email Finder 1 credit, Mobile Finder 5, Email Validation 0.25. Credits deduct only on a successful result.

Pay-per-valid means the sticker is close to the real cost, which makes LeadMagic the honest near-peer here on the email line. Basic is $49/2,000 = about $0.0245 per valid email, still 1.6x Enrow's $0.017 at the same entry volume. Two honest caveats nudge it up. First, on the public 20,000-contact benchmark 10.6% of LeadMagic's "valid" addresses still bounce, so its real cost per deliverable email is nearer $0.0245 ÷ 0.894 = about $0.0274. Second, Basic sits below 5,000 credits, where rollover hasn't started yet (it kicks in at Essential), so anything you don't burn that cycle is gone. Phones are 5 credits each, so 2,000 credits buy 400 mobiles at roughly $0.12 on a raw-credit basis, a different credit unit from the Enrow valid-phone metric because LeadMagic publishes no EU/GDPR phone coverage (verify), so a raw phone ratio on numbers of unknown European reliability is a different promise than documented EU direct dials.

vs Enrow: both are pay-per-valid and both have real APIs, but on per-valid email LeadMagic still runs 1.6x Enrow at matched entry volume ($0.0245 to $0.017), and its benchmarked 10.6% bounce pushes real deliverable cost to about $0.0274, further above Enrow at every volume. LeadMagic's phone ratio is a different credit unit, not a cheaper like-for-like result: Enrow's phones are documented EU direct dials, and Enrow adds a rep-friendly UI and one-click CRM export LeadMagic's endpoints don't.

Apollo pricing. USD, per seat. Apollo now runs one unified credit pool (a mobile reveal costs 8 credits, an email 1), so the old separate "mobile credits/year" allowances are legacy (verify at your tier). Billed annually: Free $0 (75 unified credits/seat/mo, 900/year). Basic $49/seat/mo (2,500 unified credits/seat/mo). Professional $79/seat/mo (4,000/mo). Organization $119/seat/mo (6,000/mo, minimum 3 seats). Monthly billing runs higher: Basic $65, Professional $99; Organization is annual-only (its card shows $149/mo but monthly billing isn't purchasable). Enterprise custom.

Apollo draws everything from one unified credit pool, so email and phone share the same per-seat balance. Basic is $65/mo monthly (or $49/seat/mo billed annually) for 2,500 unified credits per seat — and here's the catch: those credits don't roll over, so whatever you don't burn each month is gone. On the monthly basis that's $0.026 per credit, email at 1 credit each, but factor a realistic ~78% utilization (you rarely spend every credit before it expires) and the effective cost is about $0.033 per valid email, roughly 2x Enrow Start and 3.8x Enrow Pro. A mobile reveal costs 8 credits, so the same pool covers roughly 312 phones a month at about $0.21 each on a raw-credit basis, before add-on credits (tiered from $0.025/credit) — and it's stored, US-leaning database data with no GDPR EU direct-dial product, so a share of those mobiles are stale on a live send. The pool is per seat, so a 5-rep team pays 5x: about $325/mo on monthly billing.

vs Enrow: Apollo is the all-in-one; Enrow is the data layer. On email Apollo's no-rollover credits work out to about $0.033 per valid, ~2x Enrow Start and 3.8x Pro; its shared pool means email and phone compete for the same credits, and its per-phone cost sits above Enrow's per-valid phone (about $0.35 on Pro) once you account for stale, undeliverable, US-leaning rows on a live send. Enrow's real-time data beats a stored DB, there are no per-seat fees, and credits roll over on Pro and Scale. Different jobs, so run both if you want the suite and the clean data.

Snov.io pricing. USD: Trial free (50 credits). Starter $39/mo (1,000 credits). Pro S $99/mo (5,000). Pro M $189/mo (20,000). Pro L $369/mo (50,000). Ultra $738/mo (100,000). Annual billing takes 25% off. Phone and data enrichment is a separate token add-on (roughly $0.02 per token). LinkedIn automation runs about $69/mo per slot.

The sticker reads cheap, $39/1,000 = about $0.039 a credit, but that credit buys a search, not a verified valid. Snov has no independent benchmark here, so assume the ~30% find rate per-search tools typically return (stated plainly as an assumption, verify at your list): only about a third of those searches come back with anything usable, which lifts you to roughly $0.13 per email actually found, already several times Enrow's $0.017. Then the second penalty — the rows come off a stored database that ages and bounces, and Snov's credits reset monthly with no rollover — so the real cost per deliverable valid climbs higher still. Plainly: you pay for every search, most return nothing usable, and part of the rest is stale and bounces. Phones sit outside the plan entirely; they're a separate token add-on (roughly $0.02 per token, ~90-day validity) with no EU direct-dial story, so there's no reliable $/phone to put down.

vs Enrow: on real cost per valid email Enrow's $0.017 sits far under Snov's ~$0.13-plus once you divide the sticker by a ~30% find rate and strip the stale rows that bounce, and Enrow finds each contact fresh in real time (no stale DB), bills only on a valid result, and adds EU phones Snov doesn't sell. Snov bundles a sender and a database Enrow doesn't; that's the trade.

LeadIQ pricing. USD, verified on its own site 2026-07-02. Free $0 (50 credits, 1 user). Pro $200/mo monthly, or 25% off billed annually (about $150/mo), up to 5 users, with the credit allotment set on a slider (the site's Pro slider ran from a couple hundred up into the low thousands the day I checked; the exact ceiling shifts, so verify it at your tier). Enterprise is custom; Vendr, which tracks real negotiated deals, puts the median LeadIQ annual contract near $26,400. 30-day trial on any plan. Universal Credits: Email = 1 credit, Account enrichment = 3, Phone/mobile = 10 (11 for a verified mobile). Credits spend on the captured data point.

Now the real cost, and this is the important part. LeadIQ bills for the capture it attempts, and an email comes back with a confidence score, not a guarantee it's deliverable — you pay for the attempt, not the valid. Take a representative Pro allotment of 2,000 credits at $200/mo: that's $0.10 per email credit on the sticker (verify the exact credit count at your tier, the slider moves). LeadIQ has no independent benchmark, so assume the ~30% find rate per-search tools typically hit (stated as an assumption, verify at your list): only about a third of those captured attempts return a usable, deliverable address, which lifts the real cost to about $0.33 per email actually found. Then the confidence-scored addresses that still bounce, plus monthly-reset credits that don't roll over, push it toward $0.40-plus per deliverable valid, roughly 20-25x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and about 40x Pro. The double penalty, plainly: you pay for every capture, most don't return a deliverable address, and part of what does still bounces. Phones are worse: at 10 credits each, those 2,000 credits buy just 200 captured mobiles, about $1.00 apiece on a raw-credit basis (11 credits verified pushes it higher), against Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, and with no documented EU direct dials behind them. Annual billing's 25% off trims the sticker, but the per-valid gap holds.

vs Enrow: on real cost per deliverable valid email Enrow's $0.017 undercuts LeadIQ's ~$0.33-0.40+ by more than an order of magnitude, because Enrow bills only on a valid result while LeadIQ spends a credit on every captured attempt, most of which don't return a deliverable address. Enrow's phones are cheaper per number and come with EU legal documentation LeadIQ doesn't publish. LeadIQ gives you a slick Sales Navigator capture UI and AI message drafting Enrow doesn't; Enrow gives you fresher, verified data, real EU phones, and the one-click full-contact CRM export none of these match.

Findymail pricing. USD. One self-serve plan, Starter, priced by a credit slider: it opens at $49/mo for 1,000 finder credits (with matching bonus verifier credits) and the headline tier is $99/mo for 5,000 finder credits plus another 5,000 verifier credits, climbing up the slider from there, with custom Enterprise above it. Pay yearly and you get two months free, roughly $41/mo at the 1,000-credit entry and $82/mo at the 5,000 tier. The trial hands you 10 credits, no card. Leftover credits carry up to 2x your monthly allowance.

Findymail only bills a found result, so sticker and real cost sit together, but the entry price is high: $49 for 1,000 emails works out to about $0.049 per valid email, which is 2.9x Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume. The gap only narrows way up the ladder (roughly $0.0085 at 100,000, near parity there), never at the volumes most teams actually buy. Phones run 10 credits, so a 5,000-credit pool covers 500 numbers at roughly $0.20 on a raw-credit basis, except Findymail returns no EU mobiles at all (GDPR shuts that door), which makes the per-phone figure moot for a European list.

vs Enrow: compared like-for-like at 1,000 emails, Findymail runs about 2.9x Enrow ($0.049 against $0.017), and both bill on results rather than the captured row LeadIQ charges for. Reach is what separates them. Enrow returns GDPR-cleared EU phones Findymail can't touch, delivers catch-alls instead of dropping them, and does the one-click full-contact CRM export. It also starts at $17 for a 1,000-email plan, well under Findymail's $49 entry for the same volume.

Dropcontact pricing. Converted to USD (EUR +20%). The rollover plan opens at €29/mo, about $35, for 500 credits with no carry-over, scaling up the credit ladder (€59/1,500, €89/4,000, €189/11,000 and beyond). Growth (adds carry-over, LinkedIn and company enrichment) sits higher up that ladder. Enterprise is custom from 100,000 credits/mo (€1,349). Annual is roughly 20% cheaper. Dropcontact runs a pay-on-success model, so a credit is only consumed when an email is found.

Pay-on-success keeps the sticker honest, but the entry price is steep once you count the credits: $35 buys just 500 found emails, which works out to about $0.070 per valid email, roughly 4x Enrow's $0.017 at the same volume. And the 500-credit entry tier carries no rollover, so credits you don't spend each cycle simply expire — at a realistic ~78% utilization the effective entry cost is nearer $0.09; carry-over only starts higher up, on the Growth tier. The multiple only eases far up the ladder (around $0.016 at 100,000, still ~2x Enrow there). Dropcontact is an EU enrichment engine, not a bulk finder, so its edge is French firmographics and data hygiene rather than cost. There's no real $/phone to quote either, since its numbers come off email-signature scraping, not a direct-dial product.

vs Enrow: Dropcontact cleans EU records well but barely does phones, and its entry cost per valid email runs about 4x Enrow's, staying above Enrow at every matched volume. Enrow wins on real-time verification, GDPR-cleared EU direct dials, US coverage, and one-click CRM export, still pay-per-valid.