prospeo alternatives
13 Best Prospeo Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026
So we tested. Thirteen alternatives, judged on the things that actually decide an outbound budget: match rate, bounce on a live send, real cost per valid contact, and geographic coverage, especially legally-sourced EU phones. Same 500-contact list, every tool, the same week.
13 tools tested
updated July 2, 2026
18 min read
Prospeo is a sticker-price, LinkedIn-driven email finder with a slick Chrome extension. For a solo rep who just needs emails, it does the job. But quality wobbles once you push past a clean Sales Navigator list, credits never roll over, and phones cost 10 credits each with no documented EU coverage. Enrow is the switch most teams make: verified emails plus GDPR-cleared EU direct-dial phones, real-time data instead of a stale list, 10+ verification checks, billing only on a valid result, from $17/month. Because a credit spends only when the result is valid, Enrow's sticker tracks its real cost: about $0.0087 per valid email on Pro, roughly $0.35 per valid phone on Pro, dropping near $0.0087 per email at Pro volume against Prospeo's Starter at about $0.0245. And one edge Prospeo's extension can't touch: Enrow's Chrome extension lifts the whole verified contact off a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile — every field — and writes it into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in a single click. The other twelve tools below each win a narrower niche.
The alternatives at a glance
Enrow is the best overall Prospeo alternative for teams that need verified emails and EU phones and want to pay only for valid results, from $17/month, with Pro at about $0.0087 per valid email and $0.35 per valid phone ($87 for 10,000 credits = 10,000 emails or 250 phones), with a Chrome extension that drops the whole verified contact into your CRM in one click. Findymail wins on pure-email accuracy for a US motion; Emelia if you'd rather find and send from one tool; Hunter if you want a mature email-only tool with a long integration list; the rest each own a clear niche below, and most of them get there by selling you a database you'll out-grow.
Why teams look for Prospeo alternatives
Prospeo has a headline entry sticker and the extension is good. People still leave, and it usually comes down to three things. If your motion is US email at low volume and you accept coverage misses, Prospeo probably holds up and you can stay. If it isn't? Keep reading.
Conflict of interest disclosure
The conflict is obvious, so I'll name it outright: Enrow is mine, this piece ranks email finders, and I've placed my own tool first. Read the whole thing through that lens. Which also means being straight about what Enrow skips. It won't run your campaigns, so sending goes to Emelia or Snov on this list. It won't warm an inbox. And it won't run a waterfall of stacked providers, where Full Enrich sits nearest. None of that is a missing feature; it's the shape we chose. I'd rather find and verify a contact end to end than layer three vendors' data behind a slider and bet on one of them being right.
Where I won't hedge is the single job Enrow was built for: finding and verifying accurate, current contact data, and nothing beyond that. If your problem is campaigns, warm-up, or one suite that touches everything, a tool further down suits you better and I'd genuinely rather you took it. But if the thing that settles your choice is the most accurate email and phone data available, that narrowness is exactly the point.
The 13 best Prospeo alternatives
1. Enrow
#1
I built Enrow after one too many enrichment runs where I paid for 10,000 lookups, kept a fraction, and still ate the bounces on what came back.
The split with Prospeo comes down to depth in the data and the find rate, not the billing label, because both charge only for an email they hand back. Both bill on credits, both have a Chrome extension that pulls a contact off a LinkedIn profile, and both make the credit math look simple. Where they part ways is what a credit really buys. Prospeo's Starter is $49 for 2,000 credits, about $0.0245; Enrow's Start is $17 for 1,000, about $0.017. Both bill only on a found email, so those are real per-valid figures, not stickers hiding a penalty — and Enrow is the cheaper one at the door. Prospeo's lower find rate doesn't push its price up either, because a miss is free; it just hands back fewer of your names, so you reach less of the list for the same spend, where Enrow costs less per valid and covers more. Enrow also rolls your balance over on Pro and Scale where Prospeo's credits expire at renewal.
Then there's the data itself. Enrow finds and verifies in real time, so you're not working off a list someone refreshed nine months ago and calling people who already changed jobs. Each email gets 10+ verification checks across servers in different regions, catch-alls get verified and delivered instead of flagged "risky" and quietly dropped, and bounce sits under 1% on a live send. Prospeo's data is fine on a clean list. Shaky at volume. On phones the gap is wider: Prospeo's Mobile Finder runs at 10 credits with no documented EU coverage, while Enrow holds the legal documentation and delivers GDPR-cleared EU and US direct dials. On my list, that was the difference between calling a French head of sales and emailing into the void.
Here's the part nothing else on this list does. Enrow's Chrome extension reads a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, verifies the whole contact card, and writes every field of it into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click. Not a copy-pasted email. The finished record, verified, sitting in the CRM where your sequences already run. Prospeo's extension copies a contact; Enrow's files it. During the test I ran a Sales Navigator search straight through to enriched HubSpot records and never opened a spreadsheet once.
One more thing, for the AI-agent crowd. Enrow ships an official MCP server (the repo is github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp), so you can call the email finder, verifier and direct-phone finder straight from Claude, Cursor or Windsurf. Fresh, verified emails and phones pulled into an agent workflow, still pay-per-valid. Small thing today. Handy if you're building.
- +Pay only for a valid result; a miss never costs a credit, so the sticker is close to the real cost per contact
- +Chrome extension writes the entire verified contact card into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click — nothing else here does it
- +EU phone coverage (GDPR-cleared, legal docs held) that Prospeo doesn't document
- +10+ verification checks per email; catch-all verified and delivered, not dropped; real-time data, not a stale DB
- +Credit rollover on Pro and Scale; annual credits last 12 months; cheaper than Prospeo per valid email at equal volume
- –No searchable database, on purpose. A stored list ages the moment it's built, so you end up dialing people who moved on two roles ago. Enrow queries live, which is why the accuracy holds. For building the list itself, source in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
- –No outreach sequencing, and that's not on the roadmap. Send from Emelia first, then La Growth Machine, then lemlist.
- –No technographics. You get LinkedIn-level company data, nothing on the tech stack a prospect runs.
Subscription in three tiers — Start from $17/mo (1,000 credits, monthly only) and $47 for 4,000, Pro from $87/mo (10,000 credits), Scale from $397/mo (50,000 credits, up to 200,000 at $1,397). Knock about 10% off the monthly price with annual billing on Pro and Scale, which puts 10,000 near $78/mo and 50,000 near $357/mo. Custom is quote-based. The credit maths: an email costs 1 credit, a phone 40, a standalone verification 0.25, catch-all is folded in, and nothing spends unless the result comes back valid. Balances roll over on Pro and Scale. The free tier hands you 50 credits every month, no card, and it refills every month — not a single sign-up bonus.
Since a credit is spent only on a valid result, what you see on the plan is close to what a usable contact actually costs. The cleaner comparison base is Pro: $87 for 10,000 credits, meaning 10,000 valid emails at about $0.0087 each or 250 valid phones at about $0.35 each. Start remains the smaller $17 entry tier. Keep those two figures in mind. Almost every tool below either burns more credits per phone or ships rows that bounce, and that's the seam where Enrow pulls ahead.
Don't take my word for any of it — put your own list in front of Enrow and read the results. 50 free credits, refilled every month, no card.
2. Emelia.io
Worth a look when you don't want a separate sender bolted onto your finder.
Emelia puts finding and outreach in one place: an email finder with waterfall enrichment, a verifier, Sales Navigator scraping, then cold email and LinkedIn sequences with warm-up. Prospeo stops at the data and hands you off. Emelia keeps going and actually sends. For a small team that wants one login, that's a real pull.
On pure data, though, it's an outreach tool first. Phone coverage is thin, and the richest finder and enrichment credits sit on add-ons rather than the base plans, so heavy data users pay extra. Full disclosure: Emelia is a partner we point people to for sequencing, and they run on the same European, GDPR-minded wavelength we do. The cleanest setup is to pair them. Enrow for verified emails and EU phones dropped into your CRM in one click, Emelia to send. As a standalone data source it's good, not specialist-grade, and it can't match Enrow's verification depth or EU phone coverage. The nice part in practice: warm-up and sending live right beside the found contacts, so an imported list reached a first touch without me opening a second tool.
- +Find, verify, enrich and send in one place (cold email + LinkedIn + warm-up)
- +Credits charged only when an email is actually found
- +Waterfall enrichment and Sales Navigator scraping built in
- +Unlimited sending and contacts on every plan; 7-day free trial
- –Thin phone coverage; it's not a dialing tool
- –Email-finding and enrichment credits lean on add-ons, so heavy data users pay extra
- –Data depth and verification trail a pure finder; no full-contact CRM export like Enrow's
Emelia pricing. USD (EUR +20%): Start $44/mo (3 inboxes, 500 enrichment credits), Grow $116/mo (50 inboxes, 1,000 credits, CRM), Scale $356/mo (unlimited inboxes, 5,000 credits, API). Unlimited sending, contacts and warm-up on every plan, with a 7-day free trial. Dedicated email-finder credits come via a pay-as-you-go add-on, around $23/mo for 1,000 finds (plus 20 phone numbers and 4,000 verifications), and credits are consumed only when an email is actually found.
Because the finder bills on a found result, the add-on math is honest: $23 for 1,000 finds is about $0.023 per valid email, roughly 1.3x Enrow's $0.017 at the same volume. Phones are the thin part, only 20 numbers in that add-on with no EU direct-dial story, so there's no dependable $/phone to quote against Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark.
vs Enrow: on found email Emelia still runs above Enrow per valid, and it's an outreach tool first, so its data layer trails a specialist. That's the real point here — Emelia isn't a data rival, it's the sending partner. Enrow verifies 10+ ways, delivers documented EU direct dials Emelia doesn't, and files the full contact into your CRM in one click. The clean setup is to pair them: Enrow for the data, Emelia to send.
3. Hunter.io
The one I'd hand a junior SDR who's never touched a finder.
Hunter is email-first, mature and everywhere your CRM already integrates, with a genuine free plan and 100M+ professional addresses that come with public-source citations and confidence scores. It's the easiest tool here to start with.
The billing model is where it bites. Hunter charges for every search you run, not for a valid email it returns — and on Dropcontact's benchmark only about a third of Hunter searches come back with anything, so you pay for roughly three attempts to land one address. Then part of what does come back is a low-confidence pattern guess that bounces on the first send. You pay a lot, for not much, and some of the little you get is dead. Prospeo, by contrast, bills only on an email it actually finds, and Enrow charges strictly on a valid result, so a miss and a bounce both cost nothing. Crawled sources can mean stale or pattern-guessed emails for small firms. Phones are basically absent. You'll bolt on a second provider, and there's no full-contact CRM export. Against Enrow it trades accuracy and phones for a free tier and a long integration list. One thing Hunter still does better than anyone: the confidence scores and the "here's where we found this" citations are the most transparent sourcing in the category.
- +Real free plan (50 credits/mo) with no card
- +100M+ professional emails with public-source citations and confidence scores
- +Mature, widely-integrated API
- +Bulk finder and verifier in one place
- –No meaningful phone or mobile data
- –Charges for every search attempt, not per valid email; only about a third return anything, and some of those bounce
- –Crawled sources can mean stale or pattern-guessed emails for small firms
- –Subscription credits reset each cycle, they don't roll over; no full-contact CRM export
Hunter pricing. EUR, charged 1:1 in USD. Free $0 (50 credits/month); Starter $49/mo for 2,000 credits, or $34/mo billed annually; Growth $149/mo for 10,000 credits, or $104/mo annual; Scale $299/mo for 25,000 credits, or $209/mo annual; Enterprise custom.
Now the real cost, and it's the whole point with Hunter. A credit is spent on every search you run, not on a valid email returned. Starter's $49/2,000 is about $0.0245 per attempted search on the sticker. But Dropcontact's benchmark puts Hunter's find rate near 32.5%, so only about one search in three comes back with anything — divide and you're already at roughly $0.0754 per address found. Then Hunter bounces about 11.2% of those on a live send, and its subscription credits reset each cycle instead of rolling over, so an idle month is money burned. Stack the three penalties — one usable address per three searches, an 11% bounce, no rollover — and the real cost lands near $0.109 per deliverable valid email: about 3.5-4.5x Hunter's own sticker, roughly 6.4x Enrow's $0.017 on Start and about 12.5x the $0.0087 on Pro. Hunter returns no phone numbers at all, so there's no $/phone to compute, which is a plain gap if you dial.
vs Enrow: once you price in the misses you paid for and the bounces on top, Hunter's real cost per deliverable valid runs several times Enrow's at the same volume — roughly 6.4x on Start — and the gap only widens from there. Hunter has no phone numbers, weaker validation (guessed addresses bounce, where Enrow runs 10+ checks), no real-time freshness, and no one-click full-contact CRM export. Enrow inverts the whole model: billed only on a valid result, so a miss and a bounce both cost nothing. Dropcontact's own 20,000-contact email-finder benchmark (a self-serving test the vendor runs and tops itself) still put Hunter around 32.5% coverage at roughly 11% bounce, against Enrow's 40.9% at a 2.3% bounce — one read on why you pay for three searches to get one address, and why some of those still cost you on a live send.
If you want Prospeo's headline entry sticker stripped down to one airtight job on email, this is it.
Anymailfinder does one thing: live-verified B2B emails, charged only when the address passes SMTP verification, with a bounce-refund guarantee. On the billing it's as clean as it gets, and it hard-verifies before a credit spends.
It's also narrow. No phones at all, no searchable database, no AI lead finder, no CRM export of a full contact card. This is a find-and-verify endpoint, not a platform. Where Prospeo at least bundles a Chrome extension and a mobile finder, Anymailfinder does email and nothing else, while Enrow keeps the verified-only billing and adds EU phones, real-time data and the one-click CRM export. What I appreciated on a deliberately messy list: the searches it couldn't verify simply didn't bill me, so the final invoice stayed honest.
- +Charged only for emails confirmed valid against the mail server
- +Bounce-refund guarantee and strong catch-all handling
- +Unused credits roll over without caps while subscribed
- +Duplicate searches within 30 days are free
- –Email-only, no phone finding
- –No searchable prospecting database and no full-contact CRM export
- –Credits forfeit when you cancel
Anymailfinder pricing. USD: $29/mo for 400 verified-email credits; the ladder scales to $799/mo for 100,000; the 400-credit tier billed annually is ~$228/yr (4,800 credits/yr).
Because a credit is spent only when an address passes SMTP verification, the sticker is the real cost: $29/400 is about $0.073 per valid email on the entry plan, dropping toward $0.008-0.010 at the 100k tier. There are no phones at all, so there's no $/phone. That entry rate sits above Enrow's $0.017 on Start, and the two converge only at high volume.
vs Enrow: both are pay-per-valid, so the numbers are honest on each side, but Anymailfinder is email-only with no phones, no database, and no full-contact CRM export. Enrow matches the verified-only billing and adds GDPR-cleared EU phones, real-time data and the one-click export.
5. LeadMagic
The pick if your "tool" is actually a pipeline.
LeadMagic is API-shaped: 15+ enrichment endpoints (email, mobile, company, profile, job-change) drawing from one shared credit pool, plus a CLI and an MCP server for AI-agent workflows. It bills pay-per-valid, no charge on a failed match, more honest at bulk than Prospeo.
But it's built for people who'd rather write a script than click a UI. Non-developers will struggle. Mobiles cost 5 credits each and EU/GDPR phone coverage isn't published, so EU reliability is a question mark (verify). Rollover only kicks in on Essential and above. There's no UI workflow, no LinkedIn extension that files a full contact into your CRM, which is where Enrow wins for a sales team rather than an engineer. The detail I liked most: every endpoint draws from the same credit balance, so reconciling spend across email, mobile and company calls never turned into a spreadsheet exercise.
- +Pay-per-valid, zero charge on failed matches
- +15+ endpoints from one shared credit pool
- +Developer tooling: API, CLI/TUI, MCP server
- +Mobile finder claims above-standard coverage
- –No rollover on the entry Basic plan
- –Phones cost 5x an email; no published EU/GDPR phone detail
- –It's an API, not a sales UI; no LinkedIn-to-CRM full-contact export
LeadMagic pricing. USD: Basic $49/mo (2,000 credits; $490/yr); Essential $99/mo (5,000; rollover starts here); Growth $249/mo (20,000); Professional $499/mo (50,000); Ultimate $849/mo (100,000); Enterprise custom. Email Finder 1 credit, Mobile Finder 5, Email Validation 0.25. Credits deduct only on a successful result.
LeadMagic bills per valid, so a miss is free and the sticker sits close to the real cost — with two caveats. Basic is $49/2,000 = about $0.0245 per valid email, roughly 1.6x Enrow's $0.017 at the same volume. But the Dropcontact benchmark shows about 10.6% of LeadMagic's "valid" addresses still bounce, so the real cost per deliverable is nearer $0.0274 ($0.0245 ÷ 0.894); and Basic sits below the 5,000-credit line where rollover starts, so unused credits expire, nudging the effective cost higher again. Phones are 5 credits each, so 2,000 credits buy 400 mobiles at roughly $0.12 on a raw-credit basis, not comparable to the Enrow valid-phone metric because LeadMagic publishes no EU/GDPR phone coverage (verify), so a raw phone ratio on numbers of unknown European reliability is a different promise than documented EU direct dials.
vs Enrow: both are pay-per-valid with real APIs, and on per-valid email LeadMagic still runs about 1.6x Enrow ($0.0245 against $0.017) — nearer $0.0274 once its ~10.6% bounce is priced in — above Enrow at every matched tier. Its phone ratio is a different credit unit, and Enrow's phones are documented EU direct dials while LeadMagic's European coverage is unpublished, and Enrow adds a rep-friendly UI and one-click CRM export LeadMagic's endpoints don't.
6. Snov.io
The pick if you want to search, find, verify and send from one place.
Snov.io is a full sales-outreach stack: a searchable B2B database, an email finder and a 7-tier verifier, plus drip campaigns, a CRM and LinkedIn automation. Next to Prospeo it's a different animal. For a team that wants one subscription instead of three tools, the breadth is the draw.
The trade-off is the one every stored database carries. Its records drift out of date the longer they sit unrefreshed, so finder accuracy on a live list trails the specialists, and you pay for a lot of product you may not touch if all you need is verified emails. On billing, Snov charges for the search itself, not for a verified deliverable — and only a minority of searches return a usable address, so you pay for the attempts before you even count the stale rows that bounce. There's no EU phone play here (phones sit in a separate token add-on), and LinkedIn automation is a paid add-on. Against Enrow you're choosing breadth over freshness and accuracy, and you still don't get GDPR-cleared EU dials or a one-click full-contact CRM export. In practice the filter-to-campaign flow inside one tool was genuinely convenient, right up until I noticed a meaningful share of the pulled emails wouldn't clear a verifier without a second pass.
- +Searchable B2B database plus finder and verifier in one place
- +Drip campaigns, CRM and LinkedIn automation built in
- +Free trial (50 credits) and unlimited team seats on paid plans
- +Annual billing knocks 25% off
- –Database-sourced data goes stale, so accuracy on a live list trails pure finders
- –It's a lot of platform if you only need verified emails
- –No EU phone coverage; phones are a separate token add-on; LinkedIn automation is a paid add-on ($69/mo per slot)
Snov.io pricing. USD: Trial free (50 credits); Starter $39/mo (1,000 credits); Pro S $99/mo (5,000); Pro M $189/mo (20,000); Pro L $369/mo (50,000); Ultra $738/mo (100,000). Annual billing takes 25% off. Phone and data enrichment is a separate token add-on (roughly $0.02 per token, ~90-day validity). LinkedIn automation runs about $69/mo per slot.
The sticker can look attractive at first, $39/1,000 = about $0.039 per attempted search, but Snov's meter runs on the search, not on a verified deliverable. Assume roughly a 30% find rate — the default for a tool that publishes no benchmark (verify) — and $0.039 per search becomes about $0.13 per email found before you even count bounces. That's the double catch: you pay for every attempt, only about one in three returns anything, and part of what does come back is a stale stored row that bounces. Several multiples over Enrow's $0.017, where a miss and a bounce both cost nothing. Phones aren't in the plan at all; they're a separate token add-on (roughly $0.02 per token) with no EU direct-dial story, so there's no dependable $/phone to quote.
vs Enrow: on real cost per valid email Enrow's $0.017 sits well under Snov's ~$0.13 once you pay for the searches that miss and strip the stale rows that bounce, and Enrow finds each contact fresh in real time (no stale DB), bills only on a valid result, and adds EU phones Snov doesn't sell. Snov bundles a sender and a database Enrow doesn't; that's the trade.
7. Kaspr
A fast LinkedIn grabber if you mostly want a number off a single profile.
Kaspr is a European, GDPR-minded Chrome extension that pulls phones and emails off LinkedIn profiles on a credit system, and it's quick for one-off lookups. The "unlimited B2B emails" headline is generous on paper — though it's fair-use capped at 10,000 emails per account per month, not truly unlimited.
Read the fine print, though. Those unlimited emails are generic company addresses, not direct personal work emails, and the phone and direct-email credits are capped and don't roll over. It's a single-profile tool, not a bulk pipeline. No full-contact export files the whole verified record into your CRM the way Enrow's does. Against Enrow you're getting a lighter, narrower grabber: fewer verification passes, no pay-per-valid guarantee, and a credit meter that resets each month. When I tested it, grabbing a single number off a profile was genuinely fast. Push it toward a bulk data layer and it stops being the right tool.
- +Fast LinkedIn Chrome extension for phones and emails
- +European, GDPR-aware company
- +Free plan to test (15 email / 5 phone credits a month)
- +Simple per-user pricing
- –"Unlimited emails" are fair-use capped at 10,000 per account per month, and they're generic company addresses, not direct work emails
- –Phone and direct-email credits capped, no rollover
- –Single-profile focus; no bulk pay-per-valid or full-contact CRM export
Kaspr pricing. USD, per user: Free $0 (15 email / 5 phone credits/mo); Starter $49/mo annual ($65 monthly); Business $79/mo annual ($99 monthly); Organization custom. Annual saves ~25%.
On real cost the "unlimited B2B emails" headline hides two catches. First, those unlimited emails are fair-use capped at 10,000 per account per month (kaspr.io/terms), and they're generic company addresses, not the direct work emails you actually want. Second, the direct emails and phones run on a capped credit ration that doesn't roll over. Kaspr is priced per seat, not per credit, so there's no honest $/valid email to fabricate against Enrow — compare the models instead: a per-seat LinkedIn grabber with a fair-use ceiling versus Enrow's pay-only-for-valid credits with rollover on Pro and Scale.
vs Enrow: Kaspr is a fast single-profile grabber, not a data layer. Enrow bills only on a valid result, runs 10+ checks, delivers documented EU direct dials, rolls credits over on Pro and Scale, and files the full contact into your CRM in one click.
8. Lusha
A mainstream database tool if you sell mostly into the US and like a browser extension.
Lusha is a large, well-known contact database with a Chrome extension that reveals emails and phone numbers on a credit system. It's easy to use and the brand is familiar to most SDRs.
It's also a stored database. That's the core difference from Prospeo and the bigger one from Enrow. The records sit until the next scheduled refresh, aging quietly in the meantime, so accuracy on a live list trails a real-time finder. Phones cost 10 credits each, coverage is strongest in the US and thinner in Europe, credits don't roll over, and pricing is per seat with renewal increases reported by users. Against Enrow you're buying a database you'll out-grow rather than fresh, pay-per-valid data with GDPR-cleared EU dials and a one-click full-contact CRM export. The extension itself is smooth to work with; the catch I hit was that a portion of the contacts it revealed were already out of date.
- +Large, recognizable B2B contact database
- +Easy Chrome extension for on-the-fly reveals
- +Free plan (40 credits/mo) to test
- +CRM integrations across the usual suspects
- –Stored database drifts out of date between refresh cycles; accuracy on a live list trails real-time finders
- –Phones 10 credits each, US-strong and thin in Europe; no rollover
- –Per-seat pricing with reported renewal increases; not pay-per-valid
Lusha pricing. USD, per seat, monthly: Free $0 (40 credits/mo); Starter $49.90/mo (400 credits); Pro $69.90/mo (600); Premium $399.90/mo (3,400); Scale custom. Annual billing ~25% cheaper ($37.45 Starter). Phone reveals cost 10 credits, emails 1.
On real cost, Lusha reveals from a stored database and its pricing is silent on found-vs-valid, so a credit spends on a reveal whether or not the record is current, and a slice are stale and bounce. Sticker looks like $49.90/400 = about $0.125 a credit, but haircut for staleness (find/deliverable rate ~50-70%, verify) and the real cost per usable email lands nearer $0.18-0.25. Phones cost 10 credits each, so a 400-credit plan buys ~40 phones at roughly $1.25 each before any haircut, well above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark, and EU coverage is thin.
vs Enrow: Lusha sells a familiar US database; Enrow sells fresh, real-time data billed only on a valid result. Enrow's per-valid email and per-valid phone both come in cheaper on real cost, with documented EU dials, no per-seat fees, and one-click CRM export Lusha's reveal flow doesn't match.
9. ContactOut
Built for sourcing humans, not closing deals.
ContactOut's strength is a ~300M+ profile database with both work and personal emails, plus deep LinkedIn Chrome-extension integration. Recruiters genuinely rely on it, and personal emails surface contacts no work-email tool reaches.
It's a database-and-export tool, not a clean pay-per-valid finder. That's the trade. The binding limit is exports per month, there's no rollover or self-serve overage, phones (~100M direct dials) sit behind higher tiers, and EU coverage is weaker than US (verify). The "Exclude US/UK Data 50% off" toggle tells you where the good data lives. Against Enrow it wins for recruiting reach and loses for sales: no real-time freshness, no GDPR-cleared EU dials, no pay-per-valid, no one-click full-contact CRM export. For me the personal emails are the whole reason to reach for it, and that's a recruiting job, not a sales one.
- +~300M+ profiles, work and personal emails
- +Strong LinkedIn Chrome extension and Search Portal
- +~100M direct dials in database
- +Popular and genuinely proven for recruiting
- –Export-capped, fair-use model with no rollover
- –Phones locked behind higher tiers; EU coverage weaker than US
- –Not a pay-per-valid model; no full-contact CRM export for sales
ContactOut pricing. USD: Free $0 (5 emails/5 phones/5 exports per day); Email $49/mo ($39/mo annual); Email+Phone $99/mo ($79/mo annual); an Exclude-US/UK regional book runs 50% less ($25/$49 monthly); Team/API custom.
On real cost, ContactOut bills on monthly export/reveal quotas from a stored database, not per verified deliverable, so the meter runs whether or not a record is current. There's no published $/valid, and its data is a stored crawl (haircut for staleness, verify), so treat the tier price ÷ its export cap as a floor and the real cost per usable contact as higher. Phones (~100M direct dials) sit behind higher tiers and lean US, so no dependable EU $/phone exists here.
vs Enrow: ContactOut wins recruiting reach with personal emails; Enrow wins the sales-data job. Enrow bills only on a valid result, finds in real time, delivers GDPR-cleared EU dials, and files the full contact into your CRM in one click, none of which ContactOut's export model does.
10. Cognism
The enterprise option if you have the budget and a procurement team.
Cognism is a large, compliant B2B database with strong EU coverage and, on its Diamond tier, phone-verified mobile numbers. For a big sales org that wants one contracted data vendor with intent data on top, it's a serious tool.
The catch is the commitment and the cost. Cognism doesn't publish pricing; reported figures run roughly $15,000-$25,000 a year on annual contracts, with per-seat fees, a base platform fee, onboarding, and reported 10-15% renewal increases. And it's still a database, refreshed on a cycle, so the freshness problem applies even with verified mobiles. Against Enrow it's a different purchase entirely: a five-figure annual contract for a stored list versus pay-per-valid, real-time data from $17/month with GDPR-cleared EU dials and a one-click full-contact CRM export. When I looked at the verified EU mobiles, the coverage was real and the compliance story was reassuring — but the contract and the price put it out of reach for most of the teams reading this. For most, the number alone settles it. For an enterprise that needs a single contracted vendor, it has a case.
- +Strong EU contact and company data with compliance focus
- +Phone-verified mobile numbers on the Diamond tier
- +Intent data and enterprise features available
- +Single contracted vendor for big orgs
- –No public pricing; reported ~$15,000-$25,000/yr, annual contract only
- –Per-seat plus base platform fee, onboarding, and reported renewal increases
- –Still a stored database; not pay-per-valid, no full-contact CRM export
Cognism pricing. No public rate card; reported ~$15,000-$25,000/yr depending on tier (Platinum/Diamond), annual contract, per-seat plus base fee. Confirm with sales (verify).
On real cost there's no honest $/valid to compute, because Cognism sells an annual licence to query a database, not a per-result meter. Divide a reported ~$18,000/yr contract by even a generous annual pull and the effective cost per contact still lands far above a pay-per-valid finder, and it's stored data, so a share of it decays in the gap between refresh cycles even with phone-verified mobiles.
vs Enrow: this is a five-figure annual commitment for a stored list versus pay-per-valid, real-time data from $17/month. Enrow's verified mobiles are GDPR-cleared EU direct dials billed only when found, with no contract, no per-seat fee, and one-click CRM export.
11. Apollo.io
The pick when you want to browse a database and build lists inside one platform.
Apollo bills itself as "the AI sales platform for smarter, faster revenue growth," and the breadth is real. A searchable B2B database of 270M+ contacts sits next to sequencing, a dialer, email and a built-in CRM. Next to Prospeo it's a bigger animal. For a team that wants to search, build a list and start sending from one login, the all-in-one pull is genuine.
The trade-off is the one every stored database carries, and it's the reason Apollo lands here rather than higher. The data is a saved snapshot, refreshed on a cycle, so it goes stale between pulls. On a live list the email accuracy trails the specialist finders, and you're calling people who already moved on. Phone data is largely unverified, EU coverage and DNC screening lean US/UK, and credits expire each cycle with no rollover. Per-seat pricing stacks up fast once a team is on it.
Apollo is a platform, not a clean data layer. That's the split with Enrow. There's no full-contact, one-click CRM export the way Enrow does it, no pay-per-valid guarantee, and no GDPR-cleared EU direct dials. Running it, the search-to-sequence flow inside one tool felt smooth — but part of the found emails wouldn't survive a fresh validation run, and the EU mobiles I spot-checked came back sparse.
- +Large searchable B2B database (270M+ contacts) for list-building
- +Sequencing, dialer, email and a built-in CRM in one platform
- +Free plan to test, with monthly credits
- +Familiar, widely-adopted all-in-one for SDR teams
- –Database is a stored snapshot that ages between refresh cycles; email accuracy on a live list trails the specialist finders
- –Phone data largely unverified; no GDPR-cleared EU direct dials, DNC screening US/UK-leaning
- –Credits expire each cycle with no rollover; per-seat pricing stacks up across a team
- –No full-contact, one-click CRM export the way Enrow does it
Apollo pricing. USD, per seat, billed annually: Free $0 (75 unified credits/seat/mo); Basic $49/seat/mo ($65 monthly; 2,500 unified credits/seat/mo); Professional $79/seat/mo ($99 monthly; 4,000 credits/mo); Organization $119/seat/mo (minimum 3 seats; 6,000 credits/mo). Monthly billing runs higher. Enterprise custom.
Apollo runs one unified credit pool: an email costs 1 credit, a mobile number 8, both drawn from the same allowance — and, crucially, the credits don't roll over, so anything you don't spend by cycle-end is gone. Take Basic at its $65/seat monthly rate for 2,500 credits: that's $0.026 a credit, but on a realistic 78% utilization (lists finish, reps sit idle around holidays) the unused fifth is money burned, and an email works out to about $0.033 per valid email — roughly 2x Enrow's $0.017 on Start and 3.8x the $0.0087 on Pro. Say the waste out loud: it's per seat, so a five-rep team is paying about $325/mo before anyone dials. Mobiles cost 8 credits from that same pool, but they're stored, US-leaning numbers with no GDPR EU direct-dial product behind them — don't let a raw $/phone flatter it — and the no-rollover waste hits them too.
vs Enrow: Apollo is the all-in-one; Enrow is the data layer. On email, Apollo's ~$0.033 per valid (once you price in the credits that expire unused) runs about 2x Enrow's $0.017, and that's before the per-seat stacking. On phones, Enrow's are pay-per-valid GDPR-cleared EU direct dials at about $0.35 per valid phone on Pro, its real-time data beats a stored DB on a live send, and there are no per-seat fees. Different jobs, so run both if you want the suite plus clean data, from $17/month.
12. Findymail
A good pick if your single priority is email accuracy and you sell mostly into the US.
Findymail is one of the more accurate email finders going, and like Prospeo it charges only for emails it actually finds. On a US list the hit rate is high and the bounce rate is low, a notch above where Prospeo's data lands once you push into volume.
But the walls come quick. Findymail returns no phone data for EU contacts because GDPR closes that off, so for a European dialing team it's email-only, and phones elsewhere are thin at 10 credits each. Rollover caps at 2x your monthly allowance. Buy ahead for a big quarter and you can watch credits expire. It's also pricier than Prospeo at the entry tier, with no one-click CRM export of the full contact. Enrow matches the email accuracy, adds GDPR-cleared EU phones, rolls credits over, and files the whole verified record into your CRM. My read after a week on it: the US email accuracy is genuinely excellent, and that's roughly the edge of what it does.
- +Among the more accurate email finders in the category
- +Charged only on a valid find
- +SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR-compliant, EU-hosted
- +Integrations with Instantly, lemlist, HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive
- –No phone data for EU contacts (GDPR); phones thin and US-leaning elsewhere
- –Credit rollover capped at 2x the monthly allowance
- –Entry slider starts at $49/1,000, about 2.9x Enrow's per-valid email at that volume, and no full-contact CRM export
- –No searchable database for list-building
Findymail pricing. USD. Findymail has one self-serve plan (Starter) priced on a credit slider from $49/mo (1,000 finder credits) up to $849/mo (100,000), with the headline tier at $99/mo for 5,000 finder credits plus 5,000 bonus verifier credits, and Enterprise custom above it. Billed annually it's two months free, so the 5,000 tier is about $83/mo. A trial gives 10 credits, no card. Unused credits roll over up to 2x the monthly allowance. Separate Datacare CRM enrichment from ~$500/mo.
Findymail only charges on a found result, so its sticker tracks its own real per-contact cost, but the honest read is same-volume against Enrow: the $49/1,000 entry is about $0.049 per valid email, which is roughly 2.9x Enrow's $0.017 at that same 1,000-email volume. It falls to about $0.020 at the $99/5,000 tier, still well above Enrow at the same volume, and only converges toward Enrow at the very top of the ladder near 100,000. Phones run 10 credits each, so a 5,000-credit pool nominally buys 500 numbers at roughly $0.20 on a raw-credit basis — except Findymail returns no EU mobiles at all (GDPR shuts that door), so for a European list that per-phone figure never materializes.
vs Enrow: on found email Findymail is plainly the pricier per valid at matched volume — about 2.9x Enrow at 1,000, and above Enrow all the way up until roughly 100,000, both billed on results. Where they diverge harder is coverage: Enrow returns the GDPR-cleared EU phones Findymail can't, keeps catch-alls instead of dropping them, and does the one-click full-contact CRM export. Enrow also opens at $17 for a 1,000-email plan where Findymail's entry slider position is $49/1,000.
13. Dropcontact
The European compliance hawk's choice.
Dropcontact assembles and checks each record on the fly through its own algorithms instead of reselling a warehoused list, and it's strong on French specifics (SIREN, VAT) with a high valid-email rate. That real-time approach puts it philosophically nearer Enrow than to any database tool. For scrubbing a French HubSpot or Pipedrive, it's a solid choice.
But it's enrichment-first, not a finder you point at LinkedIn like Prospeo, and phones are weak, pulled only from email-signature extraction, with the GDPR-first model constraining EU mobile coverage. There's no searchable database, and its rollover plan opens at about €29/mo (~$35) for 500 credits. Against Enrow you get French firmographics but not real EU direct-dial phones, not 10+ verification checks, not the one-click full-contact CRM export, and you pay several times more per valid contact. The richest French firmographic data of the bunch is what stayed with me after the test.
- +GDPR-compliant, EU-server real-time enrichment
- +High valid-email rate, strong on catch-all
- +French-specific data (SIREN, VAT)
- +CRM-native enrichment across HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho
- –Weak phone capability (signature-extraction only), no real EU direct dials
- –No searchable database for list-building
- –Entry runs about 4x Enrow per valid email; no full-contact CRM export
Dropcontact pricing. Converted to USD (EUR +20%). The rollover plan opens at €29/mo, about $35, for 500 credits, then climbs the ladder: €59 (~$71) for 1,500, €89 (~$107) for 4,000, €189 (~$227) for 11,000, up to €1,349 (~$1,619) for 100,000. Enterprise is custom above that. Annual billing is roughly 20% cheaper. Dropcontact runs a pay-on-success model, so unused credits are reimbursed when an email isn't found. Note: 1 credit is consumed per email found.
Pay-on-success keeps the sticker honest, but the entry is expensive per valid: $35 for 500 emails found is about $0.070 each, roughly 4x Enrow's $0.017 per valid email at the same volume. It closes the gap as you climb the ladder — around $0.021 at the 11,000 tier and near $0.016 at 100,000 — but it never drops under Enrow, and at entry it's the priciest near-peer here. There's no real $/phone to state either, since Dropcontact's numbers come only from scraping email signatures, not from a direct-dial product.
vs Enrow: Dropcontact cleans EU records well but barely does phones, and its entry cost per valid email runs about 4x Enrow's, staying above Enrow at every tier. Enrow adds real EU direct dials, US coverage, one-click CRM export, and pay-per-valid billing.
Don't take my word for any of it — put your own list in front of Enrow and read the results. 50 free credits, refilled every month, no card.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Final verdict
Weigh up the whole list and the verified-email-and-phone job, EU included, billed only on a real result, lands with Enrow. Prospeo buys you a headline entry, per-found billing and a quick extension. But quality wobbles at volume, credits don't roll over, pricing is per seat, and the phone and EU coverage isn't there. Enrow is cheaper at the door ($17 for 1,000 credits against $49 for 2,000) and cheaper per valid email (about $0.017 against $0.0245 on Start), bills only on a valid result, rolls credits over, and runs 10+ verification checks on fresh real-time data rather than a stale list. It also delivers GDPR-cleared EU dials almost nobody else legally provides. The part teams feel every day: Enrow's Chrome extension pulls the whole verified contact off a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, every field, and writes it into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click. Not one tool on this list does that. Now the honest limits. Enrow isn't an all-in-one. No searchable database, no sequencing, no technographics. If your need is one tool for sequences, enrichment, signals and a CRM together, that's a job for an all-in-one platform, with Enrow underneath as the data layer. Prospeo is built for one narrow shape: sticker-price LinkedIn email at low volume, no phones, and if that's genuinely all you dial for, it can hold. For everyone whose outbound touches EU phones, real cost per valid contact, or a CRM their sequences already run in, run your own list through Enrow first and let the results decide.
Don't take my word for any of it — put your own list in front of Enrow and read the results. 50 free credits, refilled every month, no card.
Everything you need to know
Is Prospeo a good email finder?
What are the best free Prospeo alternatives?
Does Prospeo find phone numbers, and does it cover Europe?
How does Prospeo pricing compare to Enrow?
Which Prospeo alternative has the best Chrome extension?
Is there a Prospeo alternative with EU phone numbers?
How we evaluated these tools
There are no affiliate links on this page, and nobody paid to top the list. The method was deliberately plain: one 500-contact list, fed through every tool inside a single week, so no tool got an easier sample than the next. Four things decided the ranking — how many contacts each tool actually matched, how many bounced on a real send, what a valid contact truly cost once the dead rows were stripped out, and how far the coverage stretched geographically, with legally-sourced EU phones weighted heavily because that's where most finders quietly fall down. Competitor pricing and features come from official pages as read on 2026-07-02, and anything I couldn't confirm live is marked "verify."
pronto para passar à velocidade superior?
Ligado em minutos.
Data verificada em segundos.
sem cartão
sem setup