skrapp alternatives
9 Best Skrapp Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026
So I tested nine alternatives. The yardsticks were what actually decides an outbound budget: match rate, bounce on a live send, real cost per valid contact, and geographic coverage, especially legally-sourced EU phones. One list. Every tool, same week.
9 tools tested
updated July 2, 2026
15 min read
Skrapp is email-only, zero phones, and its addresses come off a stored list that only gets refreshed on a schedule, so a live send bounces more than real-time data does. And the meter isn't as kind as it looks: Skrapp bills per search, not per deliverable email, so you pay for the attempt whether or not the address ever lands, and only a fraction of a stored list comes back usable.
Enrow is the switch most teams make: verified emails plus GDPR-cleared EU phones, found fresh and billed only when valid, from $17/month. On my live send, bounce sat under 1% (observed, not a guarantee).
And one move no tool here matches. Where Skrapp's extension lifts an email off a LinkedIn profile, Enrow's Chrome extension sends the entire verified contact card, email, phone and the rest, from a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator page into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive on a single click. The eight tools below each win a narrow niche. None is the better overall pick.
The alternatives at a glance
Enrow is the best overall Skrapp alternative for teams that want verified emails and EU phones and want to pay only for valid results, from $17/month. Emelia wins if you'd rather find and send from one tool; Hunter for domain email with source citations; Findymail for pure US cold-email addresses; Apollo or Snov if you want an all-in-one database and sequencer; LeadMagic if your workflow is really a script. The rest each own a clear niche below.
Why teams look for Skrapp alternatives
Skrapp is a fair starting point, and people still leave it for three reasons. If your whole motion is bulk B2B email off a database and you never pick up the phone, Skrapp can hold. If it isn't, keep reading.
Conflict of interest disclosure
Let me put the obvious on the table. Enrow is an email finder, this piece ranks email finders, and I've parked Enrow at #1. I own it. Keep that in view for every line.
Now the concession, straight away. Enrow doesn't run campaigns, so for sequences you'd use Emelia or Snov from this list. It doesn't warm mailboxes either; again, Emelia and Snov. No waterfall enrichment, which is where Emelia and LeadMagic come in. And it's not a database you filter and browse, which is Skrapp, Apollo and Snov. None of those absences is an oversight. We'd sooner find and verify a contact ourselves than lift it off a shelf that was last dusted a quarter ago.
Here's the claim I'll defend without a hedge: on the one job Enrow does, finding and verifying fresh, accurate contact data, it's as good as anything here, because that's all it does. Want campaigns, warm-up, or a list you can prospect from cold? A tool below suits you better, and I'll point you at it. But if what you actually need is the most accurate email and phone data you can get, that tunnel focus is the whole reason Enrow exists.
The 9 best Skrapp alternatives
1. Enrow
#1
I built this after one too many months of paying to enrich a file, getting back a fraction of it, and then watching a chunk of that fraction bounce anyway.
The split with Skrapp starts right at the meter. Skrapp bills per search, so you're charged for the attempt whether or not the address is deliverable; Enrow charges only on a valid result, so a miss costs nothing and a bounce costs nothing. Then where the data comes from widens the gap. Skrapp pulls off a stored, searchable database refreshed on a cycle. Enrow finds each contact the moment you ask, then runs 10+ verification checks, multiple SMTP passes and catch-all checks across servers in different regions before an address counts. A stored list is only as current as its last rebuild. A live lookup is current by definition. That's why it bounces less on a real send.
Then the gap Skrapp can't close. Phones. It has none. Enrow returns direct dials across the US, and where it counts most on a European list, across the EU, sourcing mobile and direct-dial numbers with the compliance paperwork on file. On my list that was the difference between calling a French head of sales and emailing into a shared inbox nobody reads. Catch-alls get verified and delivered as well, not flagged "risky" and quietly dropped, which is how a lot of tools keep their bounce numbers looking tidy.
And there's a workflow edge nothing else here touches. Open a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, click once, and Enrow's Chrome extension writes the whole verified contact, email and phone and every other field, straight into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive. No copy-paste. No half-filled record. Skrapp's own extension can surface an email from that same profile, but it stops there; it won't land a complete, verified contact card in your CRM the way this does.
One more thing, and it's newer. Enrow ships an official MCP server (the repo's public at github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp), so the finder, verifier and phone finder answer straight from Claude, Cursor or Windsurf. Point an agent at a name, get a fresh, verified email or direct dial back, pay only when it's valid. That's a small thing today. It won't stay small.
The live send surfaced one thing fast. Bounce sat under 1%, and when I dialed the EU mobiles the person who answered was the person on the list, not a receptionist reading off an org chart three reshuffles out of date. Discovery ran around 60% on a mixed list. Be straight about one caution, though: that sub-1% is an observed average, not a contract.
- +Pay only for a valid result; a miss never costs a credit
- +EU and US direct-dial phones, GDPR documentation held for the EU ones (Skrapp has no phones at all)
- +Real-time lookups plus 10+ verification checks per email; catch-all verified and delivered, not dropped or aged on a stored list
- +Native CRM integrations: Clay, HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, plus webhooks, and a genuinely good API
- +The Chrome extension writes a complete verified contact card, every field, from a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile into your CRM on one click (no rival on this list does this)
- +Official MCP server (repo: github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp): pull fresh, verified emails and phones into Claude, Cursor or Windsurf, still pay-per-valid
- –No searchable list to browse, and that's the deliberate trade. The moment a tool stores its contacts, those records start drifting; Enrow queries live instead, which is why it tends to land a fresh address where a stored one has already moved. For building the list itself, prospect in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
- –It doesn't run your sequences and it never will. Send that work to Emelia first, then La Growth Machine, then lemlist.
- –No technographics. You get LinkedIn-level company detail, but nothing on the tech stack a prospect runs.
Subscription in three tiers. Start from $17/mo (1,000 credits, monthly only) and $47 for 4,000. Pro from $87/mo (10,000 credits), $167 for 20,000, $247 for 30,000. Scale from $397/mo (50,000 credits) up to $1,397 for 200,000. Annual billing takes about 10% off on Pro and Scale, so 10,000 lands near $78/mo and 50,000 near $357/mo. The credit maths stays plain: 1 email = 1 credit, 1 phone = 40 credits, verification 0.25, catch-all folded in, and nothing leaves the meter unless the result is valid. A 10,000-credit plan buys 10,000 emails or 250 phones. Pro and Scale roll unused credits forward. Free: 50 credits every month, recurring, no card.
Here's the number that matters, the one every block below gets held to. Because you pay only on a valid result, Enrow's sticker is its real cost: about $0.017 per valid email at Start, dropping to roughly $0.008 on Pro (10,000 for $87) and about $0.006 at the top annual tier. Phones at 40 credits work out to about $0.35 per valid EU or US direct dial on Pro (10,000 credits = 250 phones). No find-rate haircut, no per-search tax, because a miss is free. Keep those two figures in mind; most rivals below look cheaper on the sticker and cost more per contact you can actually use.
Don't take my word for any of it. Feed your own list into Enrow and compare the bounce yourself. 50 free credits every month, recurring, no card.
2. Emelia.io
The pick when you don't want a separate sender bolted onto your finder.
Emelia is where finding and outreach live together: an email finder with waterfall enrichment, a verifier, LinkedIn Sales Navigator scraping, then cold email and LinkedIn sequences with warm-up built in. Skrapp finds and verifies off its list, then hands off to whatever sender you've wired up. Emelia keeps going and hits send. For a small team that wants one login instead of a finder plus a sequencer, that's the slot it fills, and Skrapp doesn't play there.
It's a sequencing tool first, though, and the data side shows it. The finder is fine. Credits burn on results, not blind searches. But Emelia's center of gravity is sending, not data depth. Phone coverage is thin. Heavier finder and enrichment credits sit on add-ons rather than the base plans, so a data-heavy user pays twice.
Full disclosure. Emelia is the partner we send people to for sequencing, because we don't build it and won't. So this isn't a head-to-head. It's the other half of the stack. The cleanest setup pairs them: Enrow for the verified emails and EU phones, Emelia to send. What I liked in practice was how warm-up and sending sat right beside the found contacts. But on the data itself, match rate, EU phones, price per valid, Enrow is the layer you'd feed it, not the reverse.
- +Find, verify, enrich and send in one place (cold email + LinkedIn + warm-up)
- +Credits charged on results found, not per blind search
- +Waterfall enrichment and Sales Navigator scraping built in
- +Unlimited sending and contacts on paid plans
- –Thin phone coverage; it's not a dialing tool
- –Email-finding and enrichment credits lean on add-ons, so heavy data users pay extra
- –It's an outreach platform first, so the data depth trails the pure finders
Converted to USD (EUR +20%). Start about $44/mo (3 mailboxes, 1 LinkedIn account, 500 one-time credits). Grow about $116/mo (up to 50 mailboxes, 5 LinkedIn accounts, 1 CRM integration). Scale about $356/mo (unlimited mailboxes, 20 LinkedIn accounts). Agency plans from about $719/mo. Email-finder and phone credits come via a separate credit purchase; the standalone warm-up add-on runs about $23/mo for the first mailbox. Exact per-plan credit allowances are slider-computed, confirm live (verify).
Cost per valid: Emelia bills the finder on found results (1 credit per email, 50 per phone), so the meter is honest. Priced on its own finder credits it runs about $0.023 per valid email at the entry 1,000-credit pack (€19), dropping toward $0.006 at high volume (verify against the live slider). There's no real EU direct-dial product to price at all.
vs Enrow: Emelia sends and Enrow doesn't, so this is a partner pairing, not a data head-to-head. On the finder alone Emelia's ~$0.023 entry rate sits about 1.3x Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000 volume, and it narrows toward parity only at very high volume; Enrow still ships the EU phones Emelia doesn't and folds every credit into one pay-per-valid pool. The reason to run Emelia is the sending layer, so pair it with Enrow for the data.
3. Hunter.io
Reach for this when the job is pulling emails off a domain and seeing where each one came from.
Hunter is the email finder most people learn on. Feed it a domain, or a name plus a company, and back come addresses with a confidence score and a note on where it saw the pattern. That source-citation view is handy, and it's the one thing Hunter shows more cleanly than Skrapp's database. Real free plan too, 50 credits a month.
The ceiling is the one Skrapp hits. Hunter's addresses are crawled and pattern-guessed, so smaller companies come back thin or out of date, the same aging problem a database has. And the meter bills per search, not per deliverable email, which is where the real cost hides. Two penalties stack. You pay for every attempted search, and only about a third return an address, Dropcontact's public 20,000-contact benchmark puts Hunter's find rate at 32.5%, so the bill is already roughly 3x the sticker before you send a single email. Then of what does come back, 11.2% bounces on that same benchmark, so you paid for addresses that were never going to land. You pay a lot, for not much, and part of the little you get is dead. Verification eats the same pool at 0.5 credit each. And zero phone numbers. If dialing matters, Hunter is half a tool, same as Skrapp.
In use, the source links earned their keep: easy to sanity-check a pattern before I trusted it. Those confidence scores hide a catch, though. On the sticker Hunter's Starter is about $0.0245 per credit (2,000 for $49), already roughly 1.6x Enrow's $0.017 at a comparable entry volume. But run that sticker through the two penalties, $0.0245 ÷ 0.325 found ÷ 0.888 (the 11.2% that bounces) ÷ 0.779 for credits that expire unused each month, and the real cost per deliverable email lands near $0.109, about 6.4x Enrow at Start and roughly 12.5x at Pro. And that's before the reach gap. Hunter has no phones at all, weaker validation than a real-time verifier (its guesses bounce; Enrow runs 10+ checks), no live freshness, and no one-click full-contact CRM export. Enrow finds each contact fresh, verifies before an address counts, and adds the EU phones neither Hunter nor Skrapp carries. Same email job, more reach, fewer bounces to pay for downstream.
- +Domain and name-based finding with confidence scores and source citations
- +Genuine free plan (50 credits/month)
- +Mature integrations and a clean API
- +Simple, well-known UI reps pick up fast
- –Crawled, pattern-guessed data goes thin for smaller companies, and a "guessed" address can still bounce
- –Verification draws from the same credit pool (0.5 credit each)
- –No phone data at all
EUR charged 1:1 in USD. Free 50 credits/month. Starter $49/mo for 2,000 credits ($34/mo billed annually). Growth $149/mo for 10,000 ($104/mo annual). Scale $299/mo for 25,000 ($209/mo annual). Enterprise custom. Hunter bills per search on pattern-guessed addresses; verification is 0.5 credit from the same pool.
Cost per valid: on the sticker, Starter is about $0.0245 per attempted search (2,000 for $49) and Growth drops to about $0.0149 (10,000 for $149). But that sticker is the price of an attempt, not a deliverable address. Only ~32.5% of Hunter searches return one (Dropcontact's public benchmark), so you're already near 3x before you send; 11.2% of those bounce; and Hunter's credits expire monthly rather than rolling over. Chain them, $0.0245 ÷ 0.325 ÷ 0.888 ÷ 0.779, and Starter's real cost per deliverable valid is about $0.109, roughly 4.5x its own sticker and 6.4x Enrow's $0.017. No phones to price.
vs Enrow: Hunter's Starter sticker of ~$0.0245 is already about 1.6x Enrow's $0.017, but the sticker isn't the real number: because Hunter bills per attempted search, its real cost per deliverable valid is closer to $0.109, roughly 6.4x Enrow at Start and 12.5x at Pro. Enrow, by contrast, charges only on a proven-valid result at $0.017 (Start) down to $0.0087 (Pro), takes neither the find-rate hit nor the bounce hit, and rolls credits over on Pro and Scale, so its sticker is its real cost. Hunter hands you a guessed address that may bounce and has no phones at all; Enrow runs 10+ verification checks first, adds the EU direct dials Hunter can't touch, and pushes the full contact into your CRM in one click. Validity, phones and export, then the price.
4. Prospeo
The headline entry point for LinkedIn-driven email.
Prospeo has a Chrome extension, a headline entry sticker, and verification in the same credit pool. It charges 1 credit per email found and nothing when it finds nothing, so unlike Skrapp's per-search meter it only bills on a valid result, a miss is genuinely free. Its niche is LinkedIn email at low-to-mid volume, and the catch is coverage rather than cost: a low find rate means fewer contacts come back, not a higher price on the ones that do.
Data quality and consistency are the asterisk. Push past small jobs and results get uneven, so you get fewer usable contacts back. Phones cost 10 credits each with no documented EU coverage (verify). No rollover either, so whatever you don't burn each cycle is gone, one spot where Skrapp's monthly roll-over quietly wins. The per-valid meter itself is fair; the real trade is coverage and the credits that evaporate at month-end.
I ran a batch of French and UK LinkedIn URLs through it, and the pattern from my run matched the reputation: the extension is quick, small jobs came back fine, then the hit rate slid once the list got bigger and more European. That's the trade with the headline entry point. Against it: Enrow also bills only on a valid result, runs 10+ verification checks before an email counts, holds documented EU phone coverage, and rolls credits over on Pro and Scale. Prospeo's misses don't cost you money, but they cost you reach, and its unused credits die each month where Enrow's carry forward.
- +1 credit per email found, 0 on a miss
- +LinkedIn and domain finder with a solid Chrome extension
- +Verification in the same credit pool
- +Free plan (100 credits/month)
- –Uneven data quality once you push past small jobs
- –Phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU coverage
- –No credit rollover; per-user pricing
USD, per user: Free $0 (100 credits/mo). Starter $49/mo (2,000 credits). Growth $99/mo (5,000). Pro $249/mo (15,000). Enterprise custom. Annual is roughly 25% cheaper, so Starter drops to about $37/mo. Billing is 1 credit per email found, 0 on a miss; a direct mobile costs 10 credits (verify against the live slider, plan credits shift periodically).
Cost per valid: because Prospeo charges 1 credit per email found and nothing on a miss, the sticker is close to the real cost, about $0.0245 per valid email at Starter (2,000 for $49). Its low find rate doesn't inflate that price, it just returns fewer contacts, so the cost lands on coverage, not the meter. A mobile at 10 credits works out to roughly $0.25, with no documented EU coverage.
vs Enrow: Prospeo's Starter sits at about $0.0245 per valid email, roughly 1.6x Enrow's $0.017 at a comparable entry volume, and both bill only on a found result, so the meters are honest on each side. Enrow just lands the cheaper valid at every matched volume ($0.017 at Start, $0.0087 on Pro), delivers documented EU phones Prospeo can't confirm, and rolls credits over where Prospeo's expire. Prospeo's per-user pricing also stacks up fast across a team.
5. Snov.io
Go here if you want to search, find, verify and send from one place.
Snov.io is a full sales-outreach stack: a searchable B2B database, an email finder and a multi-step verifier, plus drip campaigns, a CRM and LinkedIn automation. Next to Skrapp it's the broader animal. Skrapp finds, verifies and lets you browse a list. Snov also runs the sequence and the CRM. Its niche is the team that wants one subscription instead of a finder, a sender and a CRM, and will trade some data quality for that breadth.
The trade is real. Snov leans on a stored database, and a stored row is only as fresh as the last time Snov rebuilt it, so finder accuracy on a live list trails the specialists, the same problem Skrapp has. Its credit charges when you save and reveal a prospect, not on a proven-deliverable send. So a record you paid to reveal can still be a dead address. You carry a lot of product you may never open if verified emails are all you need. And no EU phone play here.
The prospect search and campaign builder in one tool did make it easy to go from filter to first email. That much worked. But a chunk of the revealed emails on my list needed a second verification pass, and some still bounced. That's the database tax: you pay to reveal a stored row whether or not it lands. Enrow finds each contact fresh in real time, verifies with 10+ checks before it counts, and adds the EU phones Snov skips. You give up the built-in sequencer. For the data itself, though, it's the cleaner, fresher source.
- +Searchable B2B database plus finder and verifier in one place
- +Drip campaigns, CRM and LinkedIn automation built in
- +Unlimited team seats on paid plans
- +Annual billing knocks 25% off
- –Database-sourced data goes stale, so accuracy on a live list trails pure finders
- –It's a lot of platform if you only need verified emails
- –No EU phone coverage; LinkedIn automation is a paid add-on
USD: Trial free (50 credits). Starter $39/mo (1,000 credits). Pro S $99/mo (5,000). Pro M $189/mo (20,000). Pro L $369/mo (50,000). Ultra $738/mo (100,000). Annual billing takes 25% off. Phones and enrichment run on separate pay-as-you-go tokens (~$0.02 each). Add-ons: LinkedIn automation about $69/mo per slot. Plan numbers confirmed on the site (verify).
Cost per valid: on the sticker, Starter is about $0.039 per attempted search (1,000 for $39), already roughly 2.3x Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000 volume. But that credit buys a search, not a deliverable address. Snov spends it to reveal a stored, database-sourced row whether or not it lands, and with no published benchmark for Snov I assume a ~30% find rate, in line with the other per-search tools. That alone pushes the real cost to about $0.13 per usable email, roughly 3.3x the sticker and near 7.6x Enrow at Start, before you count the stored addresses that bounce on a live send and the credits that reset each month rather than rolling over. That's the database tax made explicit: you pay for every reveal, only a slice comes back usable, and some of that slice is dead. Snov's sticker keeps dropping at volume and can look competitive on paper at the very top tier (100,000 for $738), but that's the trap: it's a headline wrapper over weak, stored data, so the real cost per valid stays well above the sticker. Phones aren't in this pool at all: they run on separate pay-as-you-go tokens (~$0.02 each, ~90-day validity) with no EU direct-dial product.
vs Enrow: Snov bundles a sender and a database; Enrow doesn't. But strip it to the data. Snov is billed per search to reveal a stored row that may be stale and bounce (~$0.13 per valid email once the ~30% find rate is priced in, before the bounces), with phones as a separate token add-on; Enrow finds fresh in real time, verifies with 10+ checks, bills only on a proven-valid result at $0.017 (Start) to $0.0087 (Pro), and folds EU phones Snov has no answer to into the same pay-per-valid credit pool.
6. Apollo
For teams that want one platform to source, enrich and send.
Apollo pairs a huge B2B database with sequencing, enrichment and a Chrome extension, all on one seat-based subscription. Where Skrapp gives you a finder over a mid-sized list, Apollo hands you the whole prospecting motion in a single tab, at much bigger database scale. That breadth is the draw for a small team that wants one login.
Breadth costs you on data freshness and on how credits work. Apollo is a stored database, so plenty of records were last touched months before you pull them, and you'll dial contacts who moved on since, the same aging problem as Skrapp, just at bigger scale. Credits are per seat and capped tight. Mobile numbers eat into them. Export caps and data-accuracy gripes are the two things you'll read most in reviews. It's a workflow tool where the data is a component, not the whole point.
Getting from a filter to a live sequence without leaving the tool is fast, I'll grant that. Then I checked the data against a live send, and real-time won. Enrow finds and verifies each contact fresh, delivers EU direct dials Apollo's database doesn't reliably cover, and bills only on valid, no per-seat math. Want the all-in-one? Buy Apollo and let Enrow feed it the clean data layer.
- +Large B2B database with sequencing and enrichment in one place
- +Chrome extension and CRM integrations
- +Free tier to test (900 credits/year per seat)
- +One tool to source, enrich and send
- –Stored database, so data ages and accuracy is a common complaint
- –Credits are per seat and capped tight; mobiles and exports draw down fast, overage at ~$0.20/credit
- –Export caps and data-quality gripes are the recurring reviews
USD, per seat: Free $0 (900 credits/year). Basic $49/seat/mo annual ($65 monthly). Professional $79/seat/mo annual ($99 monthly). Organization $119/seat/mo annual (card shows $149/mo but is annual-only, minimum 3 seats, so ~$357/mo entry). Apollo now runs one unified credit pool: on annual billing that's about 30,000 credits/year (Basic), 48,000/year (Professional) and 72,000/year (Organization) per seat — 2,500 / 4,000 / 6,000 per seat per month — with mobile reveals costing 8 credits each from the same pool. Overage credits run ~$0.20 on a raw-credit basis (verify).
Cost per valid: this is where Apollo's real cost hides, and it's a no-rollover trap, not a find-rate one. Take Basic at $65/mo per seat billed monthly for 2,500 unified credits, and that's about $0.026 per credit. But Apollo's credits don't roll over: whatever you don't burn each month is gone. Model the way real teams use it, roughly 78% of credits actually spent once you allow for slow months and the idle holiday stretch, and the effective cost climbs to about $0.033 per valid email, around 2x Enrow at Start and 3.8x at Pro. Say the waste out loud: you pay for credits you never touch. Mobiles draw 8 credits each from that same pool, US-leaning and stored, with no GDPR EU direct-dial product, so don't let a raw per-phone figure flatter it. And it's per seat, so a five-rep team is at $325/mo before anyone runs a search.
vs Enrow: Apollo is the all-in-one; Enrow is the data layer. On the data itself Enrow's ~$0.0087 per verified valid email on Pro is a fraction of Apollo's effective ~$0.033 once the credits that expire unused are priced in, its EU direct dials beat a stored DB that can't reliably return them, and there are no per-seat fees stacking up. Apollo remains the tool if the all-in-one motion is the point; Enrow is what you pipe into it for a clean data layer.
7. LeadMagic
Worth a look when your "tool" is really a data pipeline.
LeadMagic is API-shaped: 15+ enrichment endpoints (email, mobile, company, profile, job-change) drawing from a single shared credit pool, plus a CLI and an MCP server for AI-agent workflows. Credits are deducted only on successful results, so unlike Skrapp's per-search meter you pay only when it returns something, but where Skrapp is a UI over a database, LeadMagic is a set of endpoints you script. Its niche is RevOps teams who'd rather write a script than click a search filter.
I wired a few endpoints into a test script and let it churn through a batch. The one shared credit pool made the accounting easy to reconcile, and charging only on a hit is the right default. But this is an API wearing a thin UI, not something you'd hand a sales rep. Non-developers stall. Mobiles cost 5 credits each, and EU/GDPR phone coverage isn't published, so European reliability is a question mark (verify). Rollover only kicks in on Essential and above.
Enrow's own API is every bit as scriptable, and it ships one too. But it also gives you a real UI and a Chrome extension your reps can actually use, EU phones with the legal basis documented, and credits that roll over from Pro up. Programmable, minus the part where everyone has to be a developer.
- +Pay-per-valid, zero charge on failed matches
- +15+ endpoints from one shared credit pool
- +Developer tooling: API, CLI/TUI, MCP server
- +Mobile finder included in the same pool
- –No rollover on the entry Basic plan
- –Phones cost 5x an email; no published EU/GDPR phone detail
- –It's more an API than a browsable UI, so non-developers will struggle
USD: Basic $49/mo (2,000 credits; $490/yr). Essential $99/mo (5,000; rollover starts here). Growth $249/mo (20,000). Professional $499/mo (50,000). Ultimate $849/mo (100,000). Enterprise custom. Email Finder 1 credit, Mobile Finder 5, Email Validation 0.25, deducted only on a successful result.
Cost per valid: pay-per-valid, so the meter is honest, but two things nudge the real number above the sticker. Basic is about $0.0245 per valid email (2,000 for $49) and Growth about $0.0125 (20,000 for $249); the entry Basic plan doesn't roll over (that starts at Essential), so on Basic add roughly 28% for the credits you don't burn each month. And on Dropcontact's public benchmark LeadMagic's returned addresses bounce about 10.6% of the time, so a deliverable email costs closer to $0.0245 ÷ 0.894 ≈ $0.0274. A mobile at 5 credits works out to roughly $0.12 on Basic, though EU/GDPR phone coverage isn't published, so treat EU dials as unverified.
vs Enrow: both are pay-per-valid and both have real APIs, so the meters are honest on each side. But LeadMagic sits above Enrow at every matched volume: its Basic $0.0245 is about 1.6x Enrow's $0.017 at entry (nearer $0.0274 once the ~10.6% bounce is counted), and even at 20,000 credits LeadMagic's $0.0125 stays above Enrow's rate at that scale. Enrow verifies with 10+ checks before an address counts, so its valids don't carry that bounce, and it adds a rep-friendly UI, EU phones with the legal documentation behind them (LeadMagic can't confirm EU coverage), and one-click full-contact CRM export.
8. Findymail
The clean pick if all you want is US cold-email addresses and honest billing.
Findymail is a B2B email finder built for outreach, and unlike Skrapp's per-search meter it bills on the found result, not the search, so a miss doesn't cost you. Point it at a LinkedIn list or a domain and verified business emails come back. US email accuracy is solid. Where it edges Skrapp is focus: it isn't trying to be a browsable database, it's trying to return an accurate address.
Geography and reach are the ceiling. Findymail returns no phone numbers for EU contacts, GDPR closes that door, so for a Europe-focused team it's effectively email-only, just like Skrapp. Its own phone product runs at 10 credits a number and is thin outside the US. Rollover caps at 2x your monthly allowance too. Buy ahead for a big quarter and the surplus dies at renewal.
The pay-per-found meter kept the bill honest in my run, which is more than Skrapp's per-search billing manages. But it stops at US email. Enrow matches that billing and then adds what Findymail can't: GDPR-cleared EU phones, catch-alls delivered instead of dropped, real-time lookups over a stored list, and the one-click full-contact export into your CRM. Honest meter, but it goes further.
- +Bills on the found result, not per search
- +Strong, accurate US B2B email finding
- +SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant, EU-hosted
- +Native HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Instantly and lemlist integrations
- –No EU phone data (GDPR); phones elsewhere are thin
- –Credit rollover caps at 2x your monthly allowance
- –Subscription-only, no meaningful free plan
USD monthly: Basic $49 (1,000 finder + 1,000 verifier credits), Starter $99 (5,000), Business $249 (15,000), Business Plus $399 (30,000), Scale $549 (50,000), Scale 100K $849 (100,000). Annual is roughly 17% cheaper (two months free), so Basic drops to about $41/mo. Credits granted upfront on annual. Billing is per verified result, 1 email = 1 credit, 1 phone = 10 credits.
Cost per valid: because it charges only on a found email, sticker is close to real. Basic works out to about $0.049 per valid email (1,000 for $49), Business to about $0.0166 (15,000 for $249). A US phone at 10 credits runs roughly $0.49 on Basic. For EU dials there's no figure, GDPR closes that off.
vs Enrow: both bill on results, so compare at the same volume. At entry Findymail's $0.049 per valid email (1,000 for $49) is about 2.9x Enrow's $0.017 for the same 1,000 — not close, plainly pricier. Findymail's rate only nears Enrow's if you climb to its 100,000-credit tier, a volume most teams never touch, and even there it doesn't beat Enrow. A valid EU phone then costs about $0.35 on Enrow where Findymail has none to sell. Same honest meter, cheaper contacts at matched volume, wider reach, plus the one-click CRM export.
9. Dropcontact
The European compliance hawk's choice.
Dropcontact builds and verifies data from algorithms rather than reselling a stored list, with French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) and high email validity. Unlike Skrapp's database, it's real-time enrichment, a genuine edge for European records that drift fast. Its niche is narrow and clear: cleaning and enriching French and EU records inside HubSpot or Pipedrive.
Step outside that niche and the cons show. Phones are weak, pulled only from email-signature extraction, so there's no genuine direct-dial product, the same practical gap as Skrapp. No searchable database. And the entry tier is small, 500 credits, so the per-valid cost at low volume runs high. It's enrichment-first, not a finder, and even less about list-building than Skrapp.
I pushed a French account list through it and the SIREN and VAT fields came back cleaner than anything else on this test, which is exactly what Dropcontact is for. That's also the edge of what it does. Enrow finds and verifies in real time the same way, but it actually delivers EU direct-dial phones with the compliance paperwork behind them, covers the US too, runs 10+ verification checks, bills only on a valid result, and drops the full contact into your CRM in one click. For enrichment plus reach, not just cleaning, Enrow is the broader tool.
- +GDPR-compliant, EU-server real-time enrichment (not a stored DB)
- +High email validity, strong on catch-all
- +French-specific data (SIREN, VAT)
- +CRM-native enrichment across HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho
- –Weak phone capability (signature-extraction only)
- –No searchable database for list-building
- –Small 500-credit entry tier, so per-valid cost runs high at low volume
Converted to USD (EUR +20%). The rollover plan runs: about $35/mo (500 credits, €29), $71 (1,500, €59), $107 (4,000, €89), $227 (11,000, €189), scaling up to about $1,619 for 100,000 (€1,349). Credits roll over on this plan. Enterprise is custom from 150,000 credits/mo. Annual billing carries a "-20%" badge on the page.
Cost per valid: Dropcontact bills per verified valid (pay-on-success), so a credit is spent on a usable enriched result rather than a blind row, and the sticker is close to the real cost. The entry tier's $35 for 500 credits works out to about $0.070 per valid email. Phones barely exist here (signature extraction only), so there's no direct-dial figure to quote.
vs Enrow: both bill on a valid result, so the meters line up, but the rate doesn't. At entry Dropcontact's $0.070 per valid email (500 for $35) is about 4.1x Enrow's $0.017 at Start for the same job, and roughly 8x its $0.0087 on Pro. It only narrows toward ~2x Enrow at six-figure volume. Enrow also adds real EU direct dials at ~$0.35 and US coverage that Dropcontact's signature-only phones can't match, and pushes the full contact into your CRM in one click.
Don't take my word for any of it. Feed your own list into Enrow and compare the bounce yourself. 50 free credits every month, recurring, no card.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Final verdict
Weigh the whole thing and one tool wins the actual job here: finding and verifying B2B emails and phones, Europe included, and paying only when the result checks out. That's Enrow. Skrapp's meter is fair, no argument. But its addresses come off a stored database that's only as fresh as its last rebuild, and there's not a single phone number in the product. Enrow pulls each contact fresh at query time, runs 10+ verification checks, and hands back US and EU direct dials with the compliance paperwork sitting behind the European ones. Then the move nothing else here pulls off. Stand on a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, click once, and Enrow's Chrome extension drops the whole verified contact card, email and phone and every other field, straight into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive. That prospecting-to-CRM step is where every rival on this page stops short. Now the honest part. What Enrow won't do. It's not an all-in-one. It's not a searchable database. No sequencing, no technographics, no list you page through by filter. If browsing Skrapp's list was the exact thing you came for, keep Skrapp for that sourcing step and let Enrow sit behind it as the fresh, verified data layer, or run an all-in-one and feed it from Enrow the same way. Skrapp is built for browsing a LinkedIn-email database, a different job from returning the most accurate contact you can act on today. For that accuracy, phones included, Enrow is the one I'd put my name on.
Don't take my word for any of it. Feed your own list into Enrow and compare the bounce yourself. 50 free credits every month, recurring, no card.
Everything you need to know
What is the best free alternative to Skrapp?
Why do people look for a Skrapp alternative?
Does Skrapp find phone numbers?
How does Skrapp pricing compare to Enrow?
Is Skrapp accurate?
Can I export Skrapp contacts into my CRM?
How we evaluated these tools
No affiliate links here, and nobody paid to be the winner. One test list went through all nine tools inside a single week, and I scored the four things that actually move an outbound budget: match rate, meaning how many real, usable contacts came back; bounce once those contacts hit a live send; the true cost per valid contact instead of the sticker on the pricing page; and geographic reach, above all legally-sourced EU phones. Every competitor price and feature came off the vendor's own pages, checked on 2026-07-02, and whatever I couldn't confirm live is flagged "verify."
utilisateur illimité
Prêt à passer à la vitesse supérieure
sans cb
aucun setup requis