11 Best Clodura.ai Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026

USD, per seat, billed annually. Free $0 (900 credits/year). Basic $49/seat/mo (about 30,000 credits/year). Professional $79/seat/mo (about 48,000/year). Organization $119/seat/mo (about 72,000/year, minimum 3 seats). Enterprise custom. Monthly billing runs higher, near $65/$99/$149. Credits are shared across email, mobile and export, they expire each cycle, and a mobile costs 8x an email.

Normalize it and the picture shifts, though not in the way most comparisons claim. Apollo isn't billed per search, and it isn't billed per valid either. It's billed per seat, on credits that expire. Take the monthly Basic seat: $65 for 2,500 unified credits, so $0.026 a credit at face value. Now count what dies. Lists finish mid-month, reps sit idle between campaigns, and December happens. Figure roughly 15% of a month's credits unused, plus about one dead month a year, which leaves 9.35 useful months out of 12, near 78% utilization. Say that waste out loud, because Apollo won't: it drags the honest figure to about $0.033 per valid email, roughly 2x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and 3.8x the $0.0087 on Pro. Then multiply by heads, because the credits belong to the seat, not the team. Five reps is $325/mo, not $65. Mobiles cost 8 credits, so one seat's 2,500 credits stops at about 312 numbers a month, and any per-number rate you compute off that flatters a stored, US-leaning list with no GDPR EU direct-dial product behind it. Not the same purchase as a European mobile you can legally dial.

vs Enrow: Apollo's per-seat credits expire unused, which turns a $0.026 sticker into about $0.033 per valid email, roughly 2x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and 3.8x the $0.0087 on Pro at matched volume, before the seat count multiplies the bill. Enrow charges only when the result is valid, so a miss and a bounce both cost nothing, credits roll over on Pro and Scale, and the contact arrives with EU direct dials and a profile-to-CRM card no Apollo tier produces in one click.

Quote-only, no public numbers. Sold as an annual license priced on seats and credit usage; negotiated deals run from roughly $7,000 to well over $150,000 a year (verify — no self-serve figure exists). The meter is the pay-per-attempt kind, and that matters more than the number you negotiate. A credit draws down when you pull a record, not when the record turns out to be right, and two penalties stack on that. First, you pay for every attempt while only a fraction come back usable. ZoomInfo publishes no find rate, so we assume the ~30% that per-attempt tools typically return, and we'd rather state the assumption than bury it (verify). That alone triples the cost of a usable contact before a single email leaves your outbox. Second, part of what does come back is dead: the person moved, the mailbox bounces, and no credit is refunded. Add annual credits that expire at renewal and whatever per-credit rate you negotiated is worth roughly 4x that in real cost per usable contact. You pay a lot, for not much, and some of the little you get bounces.

vs Enrow: ZoomInfo is an enterprise platform behind a sales call, with a five-figure annual floor and credits that spend on the attempt, then expire, so the real cost per usable contact lands near 4x the rate on the contract. Enrow is self-serve from $17/month, live, and billed only on a valid result. A miss costs nothing, a bounce costs nothing, credits roll over on Pro and Scale, so $0.017 at Start and about $0.009 per valid email on Pro are the real numbers, not opening bids. EU direct dials and the whole verified contact delivered to the CRM in a click come with it.

Quote-led, no clear public numbers. A limited free tier grants daily credits; paid plans are sold via sales with credit packs that expire. Contact sales for a figure (verify). The billing model tells you more than the number would. A credit spends on the search, not on a confirmed result, and Seamless publishes no find rate, so we assume ~30% of attempts return something usable and say so plainly rather than pretend to precision (verify). That puts the real cost of a contact you can actually send to at roughly 3x the per-credit rate you negotiate, before anyone opens an inbox. Then the second penalty lands: reviewers report a real slice of the output fails a second verification pass, so part of what you already paid for bounces, and the packs expire at renewal on top. Call it 4x. You pay for the attempt, most attempts hand you nothing, and some of what they do hand you is dead.

vs Enrow: Seamless surfaces volume you then have to verify, and every credit spends on the attempt, so the pack is largely bought for rows that never survive a second check. Enrow verifies before it counts and bills only on a valid result, so a miss and a bounce are both free and the sticker holds: $0.017 at Start, about $0.009 per valid email on Pro. EU direct dials and one-click CRM export come with it.

USD: 7-day free trial (5 credits). Essentials $99/mo monthly for 170 credits, or about $74/mo billed annually. Plus $199/mo for 400 credits, or about $149/mo annual. Professional custom with intent data. One credit reveals one contact (email plus mobile direct dial), verified at the point of export.

Here's what the guarantee doesn't cover. A credit spends on the reveal, not on a person who still works there, so UpLead charges for the attempt like every other database tool on this list. The 95% promise refunds a hard bounce. It doesn't refund a row where the contact left in March. Essentials monthly is $99 for 170 credits, about $0.58 a reveal, which is already 34x Enrow's $0.017 at the same entry volume on the sticker alone. Now the attempt penalty. UpLead publishes no find rate, so we assume ~30% of revealed rows are genuinely usable and state that rather than hide it (verify), which lands the real figure near $1.94 per usable contact. Be generous and call it 50% usable: still about $1.16. Annual billing at roughly $74/mo trims the reveal to $0.44 and the usable contact to about $1.45. And if your credits reset unspent each month (verify), add the 28% that expiring credits cost. Whichever line you take, you're paying for the look-up, most look-ups hand back someone who has moved, and it never gets within an order of magnitude of pay-per-valid.

vs Enrow: UpLead sells reveals off a stored database at about $0.58 each, roughly 34x Enrow's $0.017 at matched entry volume on the sticker, and nearer $1.94 per usable contact once you assume the ~30% of rows still standing (verify). Enrow finds and verifies live and charges only when the result is valid, so a miss is free, a bounce is free, and $0.017 at 1,000 or $0.0087 on Pro is what you actually pay. EU direct dials come with it.

USD: Trial free (50 credits). Starter $39/mo (1,000 credits). Pro S $99/mo (5,000). Pro M $189/mo (20,000). Pro L $369/mo (50,000). Ultra $738/mo (100,000). Annual billing takes 25% off. Add-ons: warm-up about $5/mo per inbox, LinkedIn automation about $69/mo per slot.

Snov charges for the attempt, not the result, and that is where the sticker comes apart. Two penalties, one after the other. First: you pay every time you look. Snov publishes no find rate, so assume the ~30% a per-search finder typically returns, and we say so instead of quietly picking a flattering number (verify). Starter's $39 buys 1,000 searches at $0.039 per attempted search, and 1,000 searches yield roughly 300 addresses, which is ~$0.13 per email found before anybody hits send. Second: the credits reset each month, so the ~22% you never got round to spending is money burned, pushing the figure to about $0.17 per email found — close to ten times Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume, not the 2.3x the two stickers suggest. And that is still before subtracting the ones that bounce off a weak stored list. The high-volume trap is the same trap wearing a discount: Pro L reads $369 for 50,000 credits, about $0.0074 a search, which appears to undercut Enrow's Scale tier. Run the same two penalties and it's ~$0.025 per email found, past $0.031 once the expiring credits are counted, against Enrow's $0.0079 for 50,000 valid emails. Four times the cost, at exactly the volume where Snov is supposed to win. You pay a lot, for not much, and some of the little you get is dead. Phones sit outside this pool as a separate token add-on ($0.02/token, ~90-day validity), and Snov doesn't publish tokens-per-number, so there's no honest $/valid-phone to compute (verify). A dialing week is simply a second bill. That's the database tax, and it's the same one Clodura pays.

vs Enrow: Snov bundles a sender and a database. Enrow doesn't. But Snov bills for every attempted search on weak data, so its $0.039 credit is really ~$0.13 per email found and ~$0.17 once expiring credits are counted, against Enrow's $0.017 at 1,000 and $0.0087 at 10,000, where a miss costs nothing, a bounce costs nothing and credits roll over. Enrow also puts EU phones inside the same credit system instead of a separate token, and does the profile-to-CRM card export Snov skips.

EUR charged 1:1 in USD. Free $0 (50 credits/month). Starter $49/mo for 2,000 credits, or about $34/mo billed annually. Growth $149/mo for 10,000 credits, about $104/mo annual. Scale $299/mo for 25,000 credits, about $209/mo annual. Enterprise custom. A credit is consumed by the search itself, found or not, and credits reset every month.

Do the arithmetic Hunter's pricing page leaves out. Starter is $49 for 2,000 credits, so $0.0245 per attempted search. That is what the sticker actually prices: an attempt. On the 20,000-contact benchmark a rival vendor published (it placed itself first, so read it with that in mind), Hunter came back with an address on 32.5% of the list, which turns $0.0245 into $0.0754 per address found. Then 11.2% of those addresses bounce, so the ones you can deliver to cost $0.085. Then the credits reset monthly and about 22% of them die unspent, landing the real figure at ~$0.109 per deliverable valid email. Three and a half to four and a half times Hunter's own sticker. About 6.4x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and 12.5x the $0.0087 on Pro. Move up to Growth and the same gauntlet turns $149/10,000 into roughly $0.066 per deliverable valid, still about 7.6x Enrow Pro at that matched 10,000 volume. Say it plainly: you pay for every attempt, two in three attempts give you nothing, and one in nine of the addresses that arrive is already dead. Price is only the first loss. No phone numbers at all (there's no $/valid-phone to compute), looser validation that lets guesses through where Enrow runs 10+ checks, no real-time sourcing, and nothing that moves a complete contact card from a profile into the CRM.

vs Enrow: Hunter charges for the attempted search, so its $0.0245 sticker is really ~$0.109 per deliverable valid email once you account for the 67.5% of searches that return nothing, the 11.2% that bounce and the credits that expire. That's about 6.4x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and 12.5x the $0.0087 on Pro. Enrow takes neither hit: a miss costs nothing, a bounce costs nothing, credits roll over. The non-price gaps are wider still. Hunter has zero phones, its guesses bounce where Enrow's 10+ checks catch them, and there's no path from a profile to a complete contact in your CRM in one motion.

USD, per user: Free $0 (100 credits/mo). Starter $49/mo (2,000 credits). Growth $99/mo (5,000). Pro $249/mo (15,000). Annual is roughly 25% cheaper. A direct mobile number costs 10 credits; an email costs 1, charged only when it finds one.

Prospeo deducts a credit only when it finds an email, so none of the attempt tax that hits Hunter, Snov and the database tools applies here. Its sticker is close to its real cost: Starter is $49 for 2,000 credits, about $0.0245 per found email, roughly 1.6x Enrow at the same volume; Growth runs about $0.020. The low find rate that reviewers flag once volumes climb costs you coverage, not money. The misses are free, they simply leave gaps in the list you still have to fill from somewhere else. Phones are 10 credits, so Growth's 5,000 credits is only 500 mobiles, about $0.20 on a raw-credit basis with no documented EU coverage (verify).

vs Enrow: both bill only on a found address, so neither sticker hides an attempt tax. Enrow is just cheaper and reaches further: $0.017 per valid at 1,000 against Prospeo's $0.0245, $0.0087 on Pro as you scale, 10+ verification checks before an email counts, documented EU phones, and credits that roll over instead of expiring. Prospeo's per-user pricing, unlike its misses, does stack up fast on a team.

USD: Basic $49/mo (2,000 credits; $490/yr). Essential $99/mo (5,000; rollover starts here). Growth $249/mo (20,000). Professional $499/mo (50,000). Ultimate $849/mo (100,000). Enterprise custom. Email Finder 1 credit, Mobile Finder 5, Email Validation 0.25, and credits deduct only on a successful result.

Because LeadMagic charges only on a valid result, no attempt tax applies and no find-rate divisor belongs anywhere near its sticker: about $0.0245 per valid email on Basic, roughly $0.0198 on Essential, down to $0.0125 at Growth. Two things do erode that. On the 20,000-contact benchmark cited earlier, LeadMagic's returned addresses bounced 10.6% of the time, so what you can actually deliver to costs nearer $0.0274. And Basic has no rollover: at the ~78% of credits a monthly-reset plan realistically gets used, Basic's real figure is about $0.035 per deliverable valid, a little over 2x Enrow's $0.017 at the same 2,000 entry. From Essential upward the credits roll and that second penalty falls away, leaving roughly $0.022 deliverable. The same benchmark had LeadMagic finding 22.6% of a list, which costs you coverage rather than credits, though you'll be filling the gap somewhere. Mobiles at 5 credits work out to about $0.12 per number on Basic, low on paper, though with no published EU/GDPR sourcing it's unclear which geographies that covers (verify), and five-credit dials still drain a pool five times faster than emails.

vs Enrow: both are pay-per-valid, so neither sticker hides an attempt tax, and both have real APIs. But LeadMagic's returns bounce at 10.6% on that public benchmark and its Basic credits expire, which puts its entry cost near $0.035 per deliverable valid against Enrow's $0.017 at 2,000, and $0.0087 on Pro as you scale, where a bounce costs nothing and credits roll over. Enrow adds a rep-friendly UI, documented EU phones, and the one-click contact-card handoff into the CRM.

USD, monthly (unlimited users). Free Forever $0 (100 credits/mo). Paid entry $99/mo for 5,000 credits, scaling up a credit slider to 250,000 credits at roughly $3,889/mo monthly (about $3,500/mo billed annually). Annual billing takes about 10% off. One-time PAYG packs exist at a higher per-credit rate. 1 email = 1 credit, 1 phone = 10 credits, credits roll over up to 2 months. The mid-slider tier prices between $99 and the top aren't published cleanly (clodura.ai/pricing returns 403 to automated fetch; third-party sources conflict), so confirm the exact rate at your volume live in a browser (verify).

Here's the part the credit count hides. A Clodura credit is spent on the search whether or not the record is usable, so 5,000 credits is not 5,000 clean contacts. You pay for the attempt, most attempts hand back a row that has aged, and some of what does hold up bounces anyway. Sticker per credit is about $0.020, but no independent benchmark publishes Clodura's find rate, so we apply the 20-35% find-and-usable rate teams report on an aggregated stored database and flag it as the assumption it is (verify). Real cost per usable email lands near $0.06-$0.10. One thing Clodura does get right, and it deserves saying: credits roll over up to two months, so unlike Apollo or Hunter you aren't also paying for credits that expire unspent. Phones cost 10 credits, so the $99 plan buys at most 500 dials, about $0.20 per number surfaced on a raw-credit basis, before you discount the ones that don't connect outside the US.

vs Enrow: the honest comparison isn't the sticker, it's the real cost per valid contact. Clodura spends a credit even on a dead record, so its ~$0.020 email sticker becomes ~$0.06-$0.10 per usable email; Enrow charges only on a valid result, so its ~$0.009 sticker is its real cost, six to eleven times cheaper on what actually lands. On phones, Clodura's 10-credit dial works out to about $0.20 per number surfaced with no validity screen; Enrow's phone draws 40 credits but bills only when a valid number comes back and holds the legal documentation for EU direct dials, so you pay for a connect, not a guess. Each contact is sourced live rather than served from a stored list, and the extension turns a profile view into a complete CRM record in one click.

USD monthly: Basic $49 (1,000 finder + 1,000 verifier credits), Starter $99 (5,000), Business $249 (15,000), Business Plus $399 (30,000), Scale $549 (50,000), Scale 100K $849 (100,000). Annual is roughly 16% cheaper (2 months free), so Basic drops to about $41/mo. Credits granted upfront on annual. A phone costs 10 credits.

Findymail bills on the found, verified result, so its sticker is close to its real cost on email, no find-rate discount needed. That puts Basic at about $0.049 per valid email at 1,000 and Scale at about $0.011. Fair, and among the honest meters here, but at that entry volume it's 2.9x Enrow's $0.017 for the same 1,000 emails, not close to it. Phones run 10 credits where they exist, so Basic's 1,000 credits cap at 100 numbers, about $0.49 each on paper. Except none of them are EU numbers, so a Europe-selling team is pricing an empty column; Enrow's 40-credit phone is about $0.35 on Pro ($87 for 10,000 credits = 250 phones), billed only on a valid number, EU included. On email, Enrow's edge is price and reach, not billing model: $0.017 per valid against $0.049 at the same entry volume, plus the EU phones Findymail's GDPR stance closes off.

vs Enrow: both bill only on results, so both stickers are real costs. Enrow is cheaper at every matched volume, $0.017 per valid email versus Findymail's $0.049 at the 1,000 entry, a 2.9x gap ($17 for 1,000 credits versus $49; $397 for 50,000 versus $549), and it adds the GDPR-cleared EU phones and the profile-to-CRM contact card Findymail doesn't do.