datagma alternatives
11 Best Datagma Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026
We evaluated 11 alternatives on the four things that decide an outbound budget: match rate, bounce on a live send, real cost per valid contact, and EU phone coverage. Same list, same week, every tool. For context, Datagma sits around 4.6/5 on G2 from a small review base. Well-liked, genuinely. This page is about where it runs out of road.
11 tools tested
updated July 6, 2026
16 min read
Datagma bundles a fixed ratio of emails and mobiles into each plan. Low on paper. But you buy the whole bundle whether you use its email half, its phone half, or neither, and the mobiles come with no documented EU sourcing.
The switch is Enrow: verified emails plus GDPR-cleared EU direct dials, found in real time and billed only when the result is valid, from $17/month, with Pro at ~$0.0087 per valid email. One credit pool, spend it however you like. Its Chrome extension drops the whole verified contact card from LinkedIn into your CRM in one click. And the free tier restocks: 50 credits, every month.
The alternatives at a glance
for verified emails and EU phones you only pay for when they land, Enrow is the move: $17/month in, with Pro at about $0.0087 per valid email, one credit pool you split any way you want between email and phone. The other ten each own a lane. Emelia if you want to send from the same login, LeadMagic if you live in an API, Dropcontact if a French DPO signs your invoices. Route by niche below; none of them is the better overall buy.
Why teams look for Datagma alternatives
Datagma is a capable enricher, and teams still leave it for three recurring reasons. None of that improves on a larger Datagma plan. You just buy more of the same shape.
Conflict of interest disclosure
Enrow is my product, and it's sitting at #1 on a list I wrote. So you know my bias going in, plainly stated.
Here's what I won't dress up. Several tools below do more than Enrow does: they send sequences, they run warm-up, they hand you a giant browsable database. We build none of that, and that's the point, not the apology. Enrow does one job, finding and verifying the most accurate emails and direct dials money can buy, and refuses to water it down with everything else. That refusal is exactly why the data holds up. Want the whole suite? A tool below will fit, and I'll name it. Want the data to be right? That's the entire reason Enrow exists.
The 11 best Datagma alternatives
1. Enrow
#1
Full disclosure, again: this one is mine, and tools like Datagma are part of why it exists. I spent years paying to enrich files, finding a fraction, still eating bounces, so I built the meter I actually wanted to be billed on.
Start with the bundle problem, because that's where Datagma pinches. Datagma sells you a set number of emails and a set number of mobiles per month, in a ratio you didn't choose. Enrow sells you one credit pool. One email is one credit; one phone is 40. Spend it all on emails, all on phones, or any mix, and you're never paying for an allowance you don't use.
Then the phones, which is where Datagma's silence matters. Enrow's Direct Phone Finder returns dials across the US and Europe, and for the European ones we hold the legal documentation to source them. Datagma returns mobiles too, but nothing on its pages tells you the basis for an EU number. That's a real difference the day compliance asks.
And the trick nobody else on this list does. Open a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, click once, and the Chrome extension writes the whole verified record into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive: email, direct dial, every field. No copy-paste, no half-empty card. For agent workflows there's an official MCP server too (the repo is github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp), so Claude or Cursor can call the finder and verifier directly; details on the API page.
Verification is the next gap. Enrow runs 10+ checks per address, multiple SMTP passes plus catch-all probes from servers in different regions, before anything counts as valid. Catch-alls come back verified and usable, not flagged "risky" and dumped. On my mixed list discovery ran around 60-70%, and the live send bounced under 1%. Observed on that list, not a contract.
- +One credit pool, split freely between email and phone; no fixed bundle to overpay
- +Billed only on valid results; misses and bounces cost nothing
- +US and EU direct dials, with the GDPR paperwork held for the European ones
- +10+ verification checks per email; catch-alls verified and delivered
- +One click moves the full verified contact from LinkedIn into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive
- +Native Clay, HubSpot, Salesforce and Pipedrive integrations, plus a documented API and MCP server
- –No database to browse. Stored databases age, and you end up pitching people who already left; real-time lookup is the fix we chose, so list sourcing stays in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
- –No sequencing, and we won't build it. Sending is a job we leave to Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist.
- –Company data stops at LinkedIn depth. No technographics.
Three tiers, priced monthly. Start: 1,000 credits for $17 or 4,000 for $47 (monthly only). Pro: 10,000 for $87, 20,000 for $167, 30,000 for $247. Scale: 50,000 for $397, 80,000 for $597, 140,000 for $997, 200,000 for $1,397. Annual trims Pro and Scale by about 10%, so 10,000 lands near $78/mo and 50,000 near $357/mo.
One credit buys one email; a phone runs 40 credits; a verification is 0.25, catch-all included. Nothing is charged unless the result is valid, so the cleaner comparison base is Pro: $87 buys 10,000 valid emails or 250 valid phones, about $0.0087 per email or $0.35 per phone. Start remains the $17 entry tier. Pro and Scale credits roll over.
The free tier refills on its own: 50 credits every month, no card, indefinitely. Since credits only burn on valid results, none of the 50 die on a miss.
Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.
2. Emelia
Emelia is a different job. It sends.
It's a sequencer with a finder bolted on: cold email, LinkedIn steps, warm-up, one login. Datagma never played in that lane, and neither do we. Emelia is where I point people who ask us for sequencing.
As a data source it's respectable, not the headline. Finder credits burn on results found, phone coverage is thin, and heavier data use lands on add-on credit packs rather than the base plan. The setup I actually run: Enrow finds and verifies, Emelia sends.
- +Find, verify and send (cold email + LinkedIn + warm-up) in one place
- +Finder credits charge on results found
- +Sales Navigator scraping and waterfall enrichment included
- +Unlimited sending and contacts on paid plans
- –Thin phone coverage; not a dialing tool
- –Heavy data use pushes into add-on credit packs
- –Outreach-first, so data depth trails the pure finders
Converted from EUR (+20%): Start about $44/month (3 mailboxes, 1 LinkedIn seat, 500 credits), Grow about $116, Scale about $356. Extra finder and phone credits come in add-on packs; the base add-on is about $23/month for 1,000 credits, where 1 credit is one found email or a phone runs 50 credits.
Because credits burn on found results, the sticker tracks real cost. But the finder lives in add-on packs, so your true $/valid email depends on the pack you buy (verify), and phones at 50 credits apiece are priced as an occasional extra, not a dialing engine.
vs Enrow: no contest on data, and Emelia wouldn't claim otherwise. Feed it Enrow's verified contacts at $0.017 apiece and both tools do their best work.
3. LeadMagic
LeadMagic is the closest thing here to Datagma's own spirit: an enrichment API, priced by a single credit pool.
That's its appeal against Datagma. 15+ endpoints, email, mobile, company, profile, job changes, all drawing on one pool, credits deducting only on a valid result. If Datagma's API is what you liked, LeadMagic is the cleaner, better-documented version of that same idea, with an MCP server for agent workflows on top.
It's also not something you hand a rep. There's no real UI to work in, EU phone coverage is unpublished (verify), and rollover only starts one tier up. The docs read better than most tools' dashboards, which tells you exactly who it's for.
- +Pay-per-valid: failed matches cost nothing
- +15+ endpoints on one shared credit pool
- +Developer tooling: API, CLI, MCP server
- +Mobile finder included in the same pool
- –No rollover on the entry Basic plan
- –Mobiles cost 5× an email, with no published EU/GDPR phone detail (verify)
- –API-first, so non-developers stall
LeadMagic: Basic $49/month (2,000 credits), Essential $99 (5,000; rollover starts here, up to 2 months), Growth $249 (20,000), Professional $499 (50,000), Ultimate $849 (100,000). Emails cost 1 credit, mobiles 5, validation 0.25, deducted only on success. Annual takes about 17% off.
Basic prices a valid email at about $0.0245, roughly 1.6× Enrow's $0.017 at matched volume, and a mobile near $0.12. LeadMagic bills per valid, so a miss is genuinely free — no find-rate penalty to layer on. Two honest adjustments still push the entry number up: Basic carries no rollover — carry-over only starts at Essential — so unused credits expire and add roughly 28% to the effective rate; and the public 20,000-contact benchmark puts LeadMagic's bounce near 10.6%, about one in nine of its "valid" addresses dying on a live send. Net those and a deliverable Basic email sits closer to $0.035 than $0.0245, near 2× Enrow Start. The mobile ratio, meanwhile, comes with no published EU coverage or compliance documentation (verify), a different promise than a documented EU direct dial.
vs Enrow: two honest meters, two audiences. Enrow matches the API story, then adds the rep-facing product a Datagma leaver often wants back: a UI, the extension, one-click CRM export, and EU phones with the paperwork behind them.
4. Apollo
Apollo is the usual answer when someone wants the whole motion in one tab: database, sequences, enrichment, a dialer, one subscription.
Against Datagma that's a category jump, not a swap. Datagma enriches; Apollo hands you a workflow with data inside it. For a small team that wants outbound end to end without stitching tools together, the pitch is real.
The bill for the breadth is the data. Apollo is a stored database, so records age, and its reviews circle two complaints on repeat: accuracy and export caps. Mobiles are a thin per-seat ration. Getting from a filter to a live sequence in one sitting impressed me; checking those contacts against a live send is where real-time won.
- +Large B2B database with sequencing and enrichment in one place
- +Chrome extension and CRM integrations
- +Workable free tier (900 credits/year per seat)
- +One tool to source, enrich and send
- –Stored database, so records go stale and accuracy gripes recur in reviews
- –Credits are per seat; mobiles and exports draw down fast
- –Export caps bite before the lookups do
Apollo, per seat, billed annually: Free $0 (limited credits, ~5 mobile/mo), Basic $49/seat/mo (unlimited email under fair use, 75 mobile credits per year), Professional $79 (100 mobile/yr), Organization $119 (200 mobile/yr, minimum 3 seats). Monthly billing runs $59/$99/$149. Mobile overage is about $0.20.
Email is "unlimited" under fair use, so no clean per-email meter exists — but the credits Apollo does meter, mobile and export, don't roll over, so any allowance you don't burn in the period is simply gone. Phones are where the math bites: Basic hands each $49 seat 75 mobile credits a year, $588 of seat for 75 numbers, about $7.80 per mobile against Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark per valid phone — and because those credits expire unused, a rep who dials lightly one quarter eats the waste rather than banking it. Apollo's figure also buys a reveal from a stored row, not a verified dial. And it's per seat: a five-rep team pays five times over, whether or not all five spend their allowance.
vs Enrow: buy Apollo for the cockpit if you want one, then let Enrow supply the layer it can't keep fresh. On phones it's $7.80 a ration against $0.35 verified on Pro; on emails, real-time against a database that ages.
5. Prospeo
Prospeo's price is its whole pitch. Look past it.
On my list it found about 20% of the contacts. Enrow found 60-70%. No entry price survives that gap: when four in five targets come back empty, you finish the job somewhere else and pay twice.
The rest is what you'd expect at the price point. Quality gets uneven past small jobs, phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU coverage (verify), credits don't roll over, and pricing is per user.
- +1 credit per found email, 0 on a miss
- +Quick Chrome extension for LinkedIn and domains
- +Verification included in the same credit pool
- +Free plan (100 credits/month)
- –Found about 20% of my test list; most contacts simply don't come back
- –Phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU story (verify)
- –No rollover, and per-user pricing stacks on teams
Prospeo: Starter $49/month for 2,000 credits, then Growth $99 (5,000) and Pro $249 (15,000). Mobiles cost 10 credits. Annual takes about 25% off.
The sticker reads about $0.0245 per valid email on Starter, already 1.6× Enrow's $0.017 at matched volume, and because Prospeo bills on the found result — one credit per found email, nothing on a miss — that sticker is the real per-valid cost, not an understatement. Where Prospeo actually hurts is reach, not price: it returned about a fifth of my list, so four in five targets came back empty and cost me nothing, but you still have to go source them somewhere else. The low find rate buys you a slice of a finished list, not a pricier contact.
vs Enrow: the sticker already runs above Enrow, and the find rates live on different planets. Enrow's $0.017 with 60-70% discovery buys a finished list, not a fifth of one.
Anymailfinder does one clean thing and stops.
Verified emails, charged only when the address passes verification. No phones, no database, no CRM push. One credit buys one found email, checking an outside address is cheaper, and unused credits roll over while you stay subscribed. The meter is honest and the scope fits in a sentence. On a messy list the unverifiable rows cost me nothing, which kept the bill small.
- +Charged only for emails confirmed valid
- +Strong catch-all handling
- +Credits roll over while subscribed
- +Simple single, bulk or API access
- –Email-only, no phones at all
- –Entry sits at $0.049 per valid email, roughly 3× Enrow's rate
- –No CRM push or contact export to speak of
Priced in USD: Standard from $29/month (400 credits) through $49 (1,000) and $89 (2,000); Scale $149 (5,000) and $199 (10,000); Ultimate $299 (25,000) up to $799 (100,000). Annual runs roughly a third cheaper. One credit buys one found email.
Per-found billing keeps the sticker honest: the $49 tier works out to about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 2.9× Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume, easing toward $0.020 at 10,000 and only nearing Enrow up at 100,000. Honest meter, entry rate well above Enrow's, and no phone half to the product at all, which is the opposite trade from Datagma's bundle.
vs Enrow: same billing philosophy, half the product. Match the volume and Enrow undercuts it, then adds the phones and one-click CRM export Anymailfinder never set out to build.
7. RocketReach
RocketReach is sheer breadth: hundreds of millions of stored profiles, emails and phones one lookup away.
Against Datagma that's a different shape of tool. Datagma enriches a contact you name; RocketReach hands you a browsable database to search from scratch. Type a name, reveal a contact, export the rows. Recruiters love it, and a G2 rating around 4.4/5 from well over a thousand reviews backs the ease of use. The full teardown is in our RocketReach alternatives page.
The problem is what a stored row does after it's stored. Reviewers self-report mobile accuracy around 60-70% and email bounce in the 20-30% range (their figures, not a controlled test; verify), and a lookup burns whether the reveal is live or dead. Coverage skews hard US. Its breadth kept impressing me right up until the third dead number in ten stopped feeling like coincidence.
- +Very broad B2B database with strong US coverage
- +One lookup reveals an email or a phone
- +Clean search box, browser extension, CRM hooks on higher tiers
- +About 4.4/5 on G2 across 1,000+ reviews
- –Stored reveals: self-reported ~60-70% mobile accuracy and ~20-30% email bounce (verify)
- –Phones locked behind Pro and up; EU accuracy is the loudest complaint
- –Monthly billing runs well over annual, and dead reveals still cost credits
RocketReach: Essentials $69/month (email-only, 100 lookups/mo), Pro $119 (phones included, 250 lookups/mo), Ultimate $209 (API, 1,000 lookups/mo); annual billing roughly halves the monthly rate (Essentials ~$33/mo). Overage runs $0.30-0.45 per lookup.
RocketReach bills per lookup, not per valid contact, and that's the whole problem: the reveal fires and charges you whether the stored row is live or dead. Essentials runs about $0.69 a lookup, Pro near $0.48. On email, Essentials' $0.69 is already roughly 40× Enrow's $0.017 before anyone bounces; add the self-reported 20-30% email bounce (verify) and a deliverable address clears $0.90, more once the unused monthly lookups — no rollover — are counted. On mobile, Pro's $0.48 lookup haircut by the ~60-70% accuracy reviewers report (verify) lands a valid dial around $0.75-0.95. Two penalties stacked: you pay for every reveal, and a fifth to a third come back dead.
vs Enrow: RocketReach charges you to discover which rows are dead; Enrow charges only when the contact is verified live, $0.35 per valid phone at Pro volume, EU dials documented, not a credit spent on a miss.
8. ContactOut
ContactOut is a LinkedIn-first reveal tool with a big stored database behind it.
Against Datagma it competes on the same enrichment turf, but the model is a per-seat "unlimited under fair use" one rather than a credit bundle. Open a profile, reveal the email and phone, export in batches. For a recruiter or SDR who lives inside LinkedIn, the workflow is tidy. We ranked the full field in our ContactOut breakdown.
The catches are the usual database ones. Reveals come from stored rows, so freshness varies, "unlimited" is capped by a monthly fair-use ceiling, export allowances are separate, and the reveal fires whether the row is live or stale. US and UK coverage is the strong part; go regional and the price drops but so does the data set.
- +Fast LinkedIn extension for email and phone reveals
- +Large stored database, strong US/UK coverage
- +Per-seat "unlimited" under fair use, no per-credit counting for light users
- +CRM and ATS integrations on higher tiers
- –Stored reveals age; freshness isn't guaranteed
- –"Unlimited" is capped by a monthly fair-use ceiling; exports are metered separately
- –Per-seat pricing, and EU coverage thins outside US/UK
ContactOut, per user: Free (5 emails + 5 phones + 5 exports a day). Email $49/month (unlimited emails, fair-use capped at 2,000/month, 300 exports/mo), Email + Phone $99/month (adds phones, fair-use 2,000 email + 1,000 phone/mo, 600 exports/mo). Annual billing runs about 20% cheaper. A regional (exclude US/UK) toggle halves those prices.
Because reveals fire on stored rows whether they land or not, the honest read is per-reveal, not per-valid. Spread the $99 Email + Phone plan across its fair-use ceiling and the sticker looks tiny, but haircut for stale rows (verify) and the real cost per valid contact climbs, especially on EU numbers the set covers thinly.
vs Enrow: ContactOut bills a seat and lets you reveal stored rows until a fair-use cap; Enrow bills only when the exact contact is verified live, holds EU documentation, and doesn't charge per seat.
9. Snov
Snov sells the bundle: finder, verifier, drip campaigns, a light CRM, one modest bill.
Fair pitch for a solo user with loose data standards. But the credits spend on revealing stored prospects, and stored rows drift stale, so a slice of what you pay for was dead before you bought it. A visible share of my Snov finds needed a second verification pass before I'd send to them.
- +Finder, verifier, drip campaigns and CRM in one subscription
- +Searchable prospect database included
- +Unlimited team seats on paid plans
- +Annual billing cuts 25%
- –Credits spend on revealing stored rows that can be stale
- –No EU phone play; phones are a separate token add-on
- –A lot of platform if verified emails are all you need
Snov: Starter $39/month (1,000 credits), Pro S $99 (5,000), Pro M $189 (20,000), Pro L $369 (50,000), Ultra $738 (100,000+). Annual takes 25% off. Phones live in a separate token add-on around $0.02 a token.
Snov bills on the search, not on a deliverable address: the $0.039-per-credit sticker buys an attempt, and you're charged whether it returns anything or not. Snov publishes no match-rate benchmark, so assume the ~30% find rate we apply to per-search tools and each credit that actually returns a contact costs about $0.13. Then the second penalty: part of what does come back was scraped from a stale row and bounces on a live send, and Snov's credits reset monthly with no rollover. Net it out and the real cost per deliverable email clears $0.15-0.20, better than 10× Enrow's $0.017. You pay for a pile of empty searches, and some of the little that lands is dead.
vs Enrow: Snov is the headline wrapper; the data inside is the weak part. Enrow is only the data, fresh and billed on valid, and it pairs with any sender, Snov's included.
10. Findymail
I'll give Findymail its due: it's a real email finder, and on US addresses it performs.
It also bills the way an enricher should. Charged on the found, verified result, zero on a miss, zero on a bounce. Point it at a domain list or a LinkedIn export and what comes back tends to survive a live send. We go deeper on the matchup in our Findymail breakdown.
The ceiling is geography and the floor price. GDPR closed EU phones to Findymail, so for European calling it's a spectator, and phones elsewhere are sparse. The plan floor is $49/month for 1,000 credits, unused credits carry over only to 2× your monthly allowance, and there's no real free plan, just 10 trial credits. On my list its US addresses held up; the French half came back email-only.
- +Charged on found, verified results, so a bounce never costs you
- +Strong US B2B email accuracy
- +SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR-compliant, EU-hosted
- +Native HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Instantly and lemlist integrations
- –No EU phone data (GDPR-blocked); phones elsewhere are thin
- –Rollover caps at 2× the monthly allowance, so stockpiled credits die at renewal
- –No meaningful free plan; the floor is $49/month
Findymail is a single Starter slider: it opens at $49/month for 1,000 finder credits and steps up to $99 for 5,000 (the default card), then higher, with custom Enterprise above. Annual is about two months free. Phones cost 10 credits each; rollover caps at 2× the monthly allowance.
Per-valid billing keeps the sticker honest: the $49 floor is about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 2.9× Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume, easing to $0.0198 at 5,000 and only nearing Enrow up at 100,000. Phones price out near $0.20 on a raw-credit basis on paper, except the paper excludes Europe, so on an EU-heavy list that number buys nothing.
vs Enrow: same honest meter, narrower map, higher entry rate. Enrow opens at $17 instead of $49, prices a valid email at $0.017 against Findymail's $0.049 at that volume, and returns the EU direct dials Findymail legally can't.
11. Dropcontact
Dropcontact is the pick your DPO would make.
Everything runs under GDPR on EU servers, the data is computed fresh rather than pulled from a resold list, and it carries French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) most tools ignore. On emails it works pay-on-success: an address it can't find gets the credit reimbursed. For cleaning a French or European CRM it's a fair specialist, and our Dropcontact page runs the full comparison.
But read the job. Dropcontact enriches rows you already have; it isn't built to hunt a contact from scratch the way a finder is. Each processed contact consumes a credit, and phones only appear when one can be scraped out of an email signature, so there's no direct-dial product behind the promise. It cleaned my French rows nicely and produced two phone numbers for a hundred contacts.
- +GDPR-first: EU servers, compliant by design
- +Pay-on-success on emails; unfound addresses are reimbursed
- +French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) built in
- +CRM-native enrichment for HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho
- –Enriches existing rows; not a real-time finder for new contacts
- –Phones come only from signature scraping, no direct-dial product
- –~$35 entry buys just 500 credits with no rollover; carry-over needs the pricier Growth plan
Dropcontact opens at €29/month, about $35 converted, for just 500 credits with no rollover. The next tiers add carry-over plus LinkedIn and company enrichment: €59 (~$71) for 1,500, €89 (~$107) for 4,000, €189 for 11,000, on up to €1,349 for 100,000; Enterprise is quote-only. Annual runs about 20% cheaper.
One credit per processed contact puts the entry math at about $0.070 per contact, roughly 4× Enrow's $0.017 at the same low volume, and the reimbursement only softens that on emails it fails to find. The 500-credit entry doesn't roll over either, so credits left unspent at renewal expire, nudging the effective rate up another notch until you move onto the carry-over tiers. The multiple shrinks with volume but stays above Enrow, landing near 2× even at 100,000. There's no per-phone figure to quote because there's no real phone product.
vs Enrow: the honest framing is enrichment versus finding. Dropcontact completes rows you already own and refunds the emails it misses; Enrow finds and verifies new contacts in real time at $0.017 per valid email against Dropcontact's ~$0.070 per processed row at entry, and returns documented EU direct dials instead of signature scraps.
Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Final verdict
Datagma is a likeable enricher, and the bundle is still the catch. Every plan welds a big email allowance to a small mobile one at a ratio you didn't choose, so you overbuy one half to get enough of the other, and the mobiles arrive with no documented EU basis. The moment your split stops matching Datagma's, or compliance asks where an EU number came from, you've outgrown it. Enrow is the switch: verified emails and documented EU direct dials, found in real time, from $17/month, billed only when the result is real, all from one credit pool you divide however you like. It won't hand you a browsable database or send a sequence; we left those jobs to LinkedIn and to senders like Emelia on purpose, because doing data only is why the data holds up. And nobody else on this page does the last trick, one click in the Chrome extension turning a LinkedIn profile into a complete verified contact, phone included, sitting in your CRM. Take the 50 free credits you get back every month and let your own list decide.
Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.
Everything you need to know
What's the best free alternative to Datagma?
Is Datagma worth paying for?
What's the most accurate Datagma alternative?
Does Datagma find phone numbers?
How much does Datagma cost compared to Enrow?
Can I export contacts from LinkedIn into my CRM?
How we evaluated these tools
Nobody paid to be here. No affiliate links, no sponsored slots, and the winner wasn't for sale. Every tool processed the same contact list inside the same week, and four measures decided the order: how many contacts actually came back, how many addresses bounced on a live send, what a valid contact really costs once bad results are priced in, and whether the tool can produce legally-sourced EU phone numbers. Competitor prices come from official pricing pages read on 2026-07-06; anything I couldn't confirm on a live page carries a "verify" mark.
¿listo para dejar de perder el tiempo?
Conectado en minutos.
Data verificada en segundos.
sin tarjeta
sin configuración