13 Best Hunter.io Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026

Converted from EUR (+20%): Start about $44/month (3 mailboxes, 1 LinkedIn seat, 500 one-time credits), Grow about $116, Scale about $356, agency plans from about $719. Finder and phone credits come as separate packs whose allowances are slider-computed (verify). Standalone warm-up runs about $23/month for the first mailbox.

Because credits burn on found results, the sticker tracks real cost, but the finder lives in add-on packs, so your true $/valid email depends on the pack you buy (verify). Phones are too thin to price honestly.

vs Enrow: no contest on data, and Emelia wouldn't claim otherwise. Feed it Enrow's verified contacts at $0.017 apiece and both tools do their best work.

Apollo, per seat: a paid seat runs roughly $59-65/month and comes with a pool of unified credits — on the order of 2,500 — where an email costs 1 credit and a mobile costs 8. The published ladder is Basic $49/seat/mo, Professional $79, Organization $119 (three-seat minimum) on annual billing, or $59/$99/$149 monthly, with mobile-heavy use draining the pool fast. None of it rolls over.

That last point is the catch the sticker hides: the credits expire every month. Model a realistic ~78% utilization — lists finish, reps go quiet, a holiday month sits idle — and the ~$0.026 you nominally pay per credit works out to about $0.033 per valid email, roughly 2× Enrow's Start rate and 3.8× Pro. That's before you multiply by seats: five reps is five pools and five bills, about $325/month. Mobiles cost 8 credits each and come from stored, US-leaning rows — no GDPR EU direct-dial product — so don't let a low raw per-number figure flatter it.

vs Enrow: buy Apollo for the cockpit if you want one, then let Enrow supply the data layer it can't keep fresh. Enrow bills only on a valid result and its Pro and Scale credits roll over, so there's no monthly expiry tax and no per-seat multiplier; Apollo's pool resets whether you drained it or not.

Kaspr, per user: Free (5 phone and 5 direct-email credits, 10 exports a month). Starter $65/user/month ($49 billed annually) with roughly 100 phone credits a month. Business $99/month ($79 annual) with about 200 (verify current counts).

Burn Starter's full ration and a reveal costs about $0.49 on a raw-credit basis. Those reveals come from stored rows, so haircut at a rough 50-70% accuracy (verify) and a valid mobile lands near $0.70-0.98, at or above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark. Then multiply by seats.

vs Enrow: a capped ration of stored reveals against a real-time finder that bills only on valid numbers, holds EU documentation, and doesn't charge per seat. Handy panel, different weight class.

Lusha: Starter $49.90/month (~400 credits/mo), Pro $69.90 (~600), Premium $399.90 (~3,400), Scale custom; annual billing takes about 25% off (Starter ~$37.45/mo). A credit reveals an email; a phone takes 10.

Spend Starter's 400 credits on phones and you get 40 reveals, about $0.94 per mobile, before asking how many still ring the right desk. Apply a 50-70% staleness haircut (verify) and a valid mobile costs $1.35-1.90. Emails run $0.094 a reveal, stale rows included.

vs Enrow: Lusha's US mobiles are good, and they still cost roughly twice Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark per valid phone once dead reveals are counted. On EU dials it isn't close, and Enrow bills nothing until the number is verified.

Cognism publishes no numbers. Public breakdowns put entry packages around $1,500+/seat/year with a five-figure platform minimum for a small team (verify your quote). Credits come in negotiated pools.

No public price means no honest $/valid figure, but the model is knowable: you pay per unlock from a pool whether the contact pans out or not. Effective cost per valid mobile depends on burn rate and staleness, and for most teams it lands well above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark (verify against your quote).

vs Enrow: Cognism verifies a subset of numbers ahead of time; Enrow verifies the exact number you asked for, at the moment you ask, from $17/month with no seats, no contract and no sales call.

RocketReach: Essentials $69/month (email-only, 1,200 lookups/year), Pro $119 (phones included, 3,600 lookups/year), Ultimate $209 (API, 10,000 lookups/year); annual billing roughly halves those (Essentials ~$33/mo, Pro ~$75). Overage runs $0.30-0.45 per lookup.

Here's the double penalty. First, a lookup burns a credit whether the row it returns is live or long dead — you pay for the attempt, not the deliverable result. Second, a real slice of what comes back is stale: reviewers self-report only ~60-70% mobile accuracy and ~20-30% email bounce, and there's no controlled benchmark to hold them to, so treat those generously. Pro works out near $0.25 a lookup; haircut for the dead reveals and, since monthly lookups don't carry over, a genuinely live mobile lands close to $0.49 — well above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark per valid phone, and you paid for every dud on the way there. The 20-30% email bounce does the same on the other column.

vs Enrow: RocketReach charges you to discover which rows are dead; Enrow charges only when the contact is verified live: $0.35 per valid phone at Pro volume, EU dials documented, not a credit spent on a miss.

LeadMagic: Basic $49/month (2,000 credits), Essential $99 (5,000; rollover starts here, up to 2 months), Growth $249 (20,000), Professional $499 (50,000), Ultimate $849 (100,000). Emails cost 1 credit, mobiles 5, validation 0.25, deducted only on success.

Basic prices a valid email at about $0.0245 — LeadMagic bills per valid, so a miss costs nothing, but the same public 20,000-contact benchmark that rates the finders shows roughly 10.6% of its "valid" emails still bounce, which puts a genuinely deliverable one closer to $0.0274. Basic credits don't roll over either — that only starts at the 5,000 tier — so unused ones expire and nudge the real number higher again. A mobile runs near $0.12, but that ratio isn't comparable to Enrow's valid-phone metric: it comes with no published EU coverage or quality documentation (verify), a different promise than a documented EU direct dial.

vs Enrow: two honest meters, two audiences. Enrow matches the API story, then adds the rep-facing product: a UI, the extension, one-click CRM export, and EU phones with the paperwork behind them.

Priced in USD: Standard from $29/month (400 credits) through $49 (1,000) and $89 (2,000); Scale $149 (5,000) and $199 (10,000); Ultimate $299 (25,000) up to $799 (100,000). Annual runs roughly a third cheaper. One credit buys one found email.

Per-found billing keeps the sticker honest: the $49 entry works out to about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 3× Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume, easing toward $0.020 at the 10,000 tier and near Enrow only up at 100,000. Honest meter, entry rate well above Enrow's.

vs Enrow: same billing philosophy, half the product, and about triple the entry rate per valid email. Match the volume and Enrow undercuts it, then adds the phones and CRM export Anymailfinder never intended to build.

Prospeo: Starter $49/month for 2,000 credits, with the published ladder running Growth $99 (5,000) and Pro $249 (15,000) (verify current tiers). Mobiles cost 10 credits.

The sticker reads about $0.0245 per valid email on Starter, already 1.6× Enrow's $0.017 at matched volume. Prospeo bills per found result — a miss costs nothing — so unlike a pay-per-search tool its low find rate doesn't inflate the price you pay per valid; it costs you reach. On my list Prospeo returned about a fifth of the contacts, so the money stays at ~$0.0245 a valid, but four in five targets come back empty and you finish the list on a second tool. The hidden cost is coverage, not price. Phones work out near $0.49 on paper with nothing documented behind them (verify).

vs Enrow: the sticker already runs above Enrow, and the find rates live on different planets. Enrow's $0.017 with 60-70% discovery buys a finished list, not a fifth of one.

Snov: Starter $39/month (1,000 credits), Pro S $99 (5,000), Pro M $189 (20,000), Pro L $369 (50,000), Ultra $738 (100,000+). Annual takes 25% off. Phones live in a separate token add-on around $0.02 a token; LinkedIn automation is about $69 per slot.

The $0.039-per-credit sticker buys a search attempt, not a deliverable address: Snov charges whether that search returns a usable contact or nothing. Snov isn't in any public benchmark, so assume a conservative ~30% of searches come back with anything (the default for a per-search tool with no published rate) and $0.039 becomes about $0.13 per found address before a single bounce. Since the credits also expire monthly, a genuinely deliverable email really costs closer to $0.13-0.17, several times Enrow's $0.017. You pay for every attempt, most of which return nothing, and part of the rest bounces.

vs Enrow: Snov is the headline wrapper; the data inside is the weak part. Enrow is only the data, fresh and billed on valid, and it pairs with any sender, Snov's included.

Findymail is a single Starter slider: it opens at $49/month for 1,000 finder credits and steps up to $99 for 5,000 (the default card), then higher, with custom Enterprise above. Annual is about two months free. Phones cost 10 credits each; rollover is capped at 2× the monthly allowance.

Per-valid billing keeps the sticker honest: the $49 floor is about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 2.9× Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume, easing to $0.0198 at the 5,000 tier and only nearing Enrow's rate up at the 100,000 tier. Phones price out near $0.20 on a raw-credit basis on paper, except the paper excludes Europe entirely, so on an EU-heavy list that number buys nothing.

vs Enrow: same honest meter, narrower map, higher entry rate. Enrow opens at $17 instead of $49, prices a valid email at $0.017 against Findymail's $0.049 at that volume, and returns the EU direct dials Findymail legally can't.

Dropcontact opens at €29/month, about $35 converted, for just 500 credits with no rollover. The next tiers add carry-over plus LinkedIn and company enrichment: €59 (~$71) for 1,500, €89 (~$107) for 4,000, €189 for 11,000, on up to €1,349 for 100,000; Enterprise is quote-only. Annual runs about 20% cheaper.

One credit per processed contact puts the entry math at about $0.070 per contact — roughly 4× Enrow's $0.017 at the same low volume — and the reimbursement only softens that on emails it fails to find. That 500-credit entry tier also doesn't roll over, so whatever you don't spend each month expires; on realistic ~78% utilization the effective entry cost climbs about 28%, past $0.09. The multiple shrinks with volume but stays above Enrow, landing near 2× even up at 100,000. There's no per-phone figure to quote because there's no real phone product.

vs Enrow: the honest framing is enrichment versus finding. Dropcontact completes rows you already own and refunds the emails it misses; Enrow finds and verifies new contacts in real time at $0.017 per valid email against Dropcontact's ~$0.070 per processed row at entry, and returns documented EU direct dials instead of signature scraps.