prospeo alternatives
13 Best Prospeo Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026
So we tested. Thirteen alternatives, judged on the things that actually decide an outbound budget: match rate, bounce on a live send, real cost per valid contact, and geographic coverage, especially legally-sourced EU phones. Same 500-contact list, every tool, the same week.
13 tools tested
updated July 2, 2026
18 min read
Aktualisiert am 27. Juli 2026
The alternatives at a glance
Enrow is the best overall Prospeo alternative for teams that need verified emails and EU phones and want to pay only for valid results, from $17/month, with Pro at about $0.0087 per valid email and $0.35 per valid phone ($87 for 10,000 credits = 10,000 emails or 250 phones), with a Chrome extension that drops the whole verified contact into your CRM in one click. Findymail wins on pure-email accuracy for a US motion; Emelia if you'd rather find and send from one tool; Hunter if you want a mature email-only tool with a long integration list; the rest each own a clear niche below, and most of them get there by selling you a database you'll out-grow.
Prospeo is a sticker-price, LinkedIn-driven email finder with a slick Chrome extension. For a solo rep who just needs emails, it does the job. But quality wobbles once you push past a clean Sales Navigator list, credits never roll over, and phones cost 10 credits each with no documented EU coverage. Enrow is the switch most teams make: verified emails plus GDPR-cleared EU direct-dial phones, real-time data instead of a stale list, 10+ verification checks, billing only on a valid result, from $17/month. Because a credit spends only when the result is valid, Enrow's sticker tracks its real cost: about $0.0087 per valid email on Pro, roughly $0.35 per valid phone on Pro, dropping near $0.0087 per email at Pro volume against Prospeo's Starter at about $0.0245. And one edge Prospeo's extension can't touch: Enrow's Chrome extension lifts the whole verified contact off a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile — every field — and writes it into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in a single click. The other twelve tools below each win a narrower niche.
Why teams look for Prospeo alternatives
Prospeo has a headline entry sticker and the extension is good. People still leave, and it usually comes down to three things. If your motion is US email at low volume and you accept coverage misses, Prospeo probably holds up and you can stay. If it isn't? Keep reading.
Conflict of interest disclosure
The conflict is obvious, so I'll name it outright: Enrow is mine, this piece ranks email finders, and I've placed my own tool first. Read the whole thing through that lens. Which also means being straight about what Enrow skips. It won't run your campaigns, so sending goes to Emelia or Snov on this list. It won't warm an inbox. And it won't run a waterfall of stacked providers, where Full Enrich sits nearest. None of that is a missing feature; it's the shape we chose. I'd rather find and verify a contact end to end than layer three vendors' data behind a slider and bet on one of them being right.
Where I won't hedge is the single job Enrow was built for: finding and verifying accurate, current contact data, and nothing beyond that. If your problem is campaigns, warm-up, or one suite that touches everything, a tool further down suits you better and I'd genuinely rather you took it. But if the thing that settles your choice is the most accurate email and phone data available, that narrowness is exactly the point.
The 13 best Prospeo alternatives
1. Enrow
#1
I built Enrow after one too many enrichment runs where I paid for 10,000 lookups, kept a fraction, and still ate the bounces on what came back.
The split with Prospeo comes down to depth in the data and the find rate, not the billing label, because both charge only for an email they hand back. Both bill on credits, both have a Chrome extension that pulls a contact off a LinkedIn profile, and both make the credit math look simple. Where they part ways is what a credit really buys. Prospeo's Starter is $49 for 2,000 credits, about $0.0245; Enrow's Start is $17 for 1,000, about $0.017. Both bill only on a found email, so those are real per-valid figures, not stickers hiding a penalty — and Enrow is the cheaper one at the door. Prospeo's lower find rate doesn't push its price up either, because a miss is free; it just hands back fewer of your names, so you reach less of the list for the same spend, where Enrow costs less per valid and covers more. Enrow also rolls your balance over on Pro and Scale where Prospeo's credits expire at renewal.
Then there's the data itself. Enrow finds and verifies in real time, so you're not working off a list someone refreshed nine months ago and calling people who already changed jobs. Each email gets 10+ verification checks across servers in different regions, catch-alls get verified and delivered instead of flagged "risky" and quietly dropped, and bounce sits under 1% on a live send. Prospeo's data is fine on a clean list. Shaky at volume. On phones the gap is wider: Prospeo's Mobile Finder runs at 10 credits with no documented EU coverage, while Enrow holds the legal documentation and delivers GDPR-cleared EU and US direct dials. On my list, that was the difference between calling a French head of sales and emailing into the void.
Here's the part nothing else on this list does. Enrow's Chrome extension reads a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, verifies the whole contact card, and writes every field of it into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click. Not a copy-pasted email. The finished record, verified, sitting in the CRM where your sequences already run. Prospeo's extension copies a contact; Enrow's files it. During the test I ran a Sales Navigator search straight through to enriched HubSpot records and never opened a spreadsheet once.
One more thing, for the AI-agent crowd. Enrow ships an official MCP server, so you can call the email finder, verifier and direct-phone finder straight from Claude, Cursor or Windsurf. Fresh, verified emails and phones pulled into an agent workflow, still pay-per-valid. Small thing today. Handy if you're building.
- +Pay only for a valid result; a miss never costs a credit, so the sticker is close to the real cost per contact
- +Chrome extension writes the entire verified contact card into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive in one click — nothing else here does it
- +EU phone coverage (GDPR-cleared, legal docs held) that Prospeo doesn't document
- +10+ verification checks per email; catch-all verified and delivered, not dropped; real-time data, not a stale DB
- +Credit rollover on Pro and Scale; annual credits last 12 months; cheaper than Prospeo per valid email at equal volume
- –No searchable database, on purpose. A stored list ages the moment it's built, so you end up dialing people who moved on two roles ago. Enrow queries live, which is why the accuracy holds. For building the list itself, source in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
- –No outreach sequencing, and that's not on the roadmap. Send from Emelia first, then La Growth Machine, then lemlist.
- –No technographics. You get LinkedIn-level company data, nothing on the tech stack a prospect runs.
Subscription in three tiers — Start from $17/mo (1,000 credits, monthly only) and $47 for 4,000, Pro from $87/mo (10,000 credits), Scale from $397/mo (50,000 credits, up to 200,000 at $1,397). Knock about 10% off the monthly price with annual billing on Pro and Scale, which puts 10,000 near $78/mo and 50,000 near $357/mo. Custom is quote-based. The credit maths: an email costs 1 credit, a phone 40, a standalone verification 0.25, catch-all is folded in, and nothing spends unless the result comes back valid. Balances roll over on Pro and Scale. The free tier hands you 50 credits every month, no card, and it refills every month — not a single sign-up bonus.
Since a credit is spent only on a valid result, what you see on the plan is close to what a usable contact actually costs. The cleaner comparison base is Pro: $87 for 10,000 credits, meaning 10,000 valid emails at about $0.0087 each or 250 valid phones at about $0.35 each. Start remains the smaller $17 entry tier. Keep those two figures in mind. Almost every tool below either burns more credits per phone or ships rows that bounce, and that's the seam where Enrow pulls ahead.
Don't take my word for any of it — put your own list in front of Enrow and read the results. 50 free credits, refilled every month, no card.
2. Emelia.io
Worth a look when you don't want a separate sender bolted onto your finder.
Emelia puts finding and outreach in one place: an email finder with waterfall enrichment, a verifier, Sales Navigator scraping, then cold email and LinkedIn sequences with warm-up. Prospeo stops at the data and hands you off. Emelia keeps going and actually sends. For a small team that wants one login, that's a real pull.
On pure data, though, it's an outreach tool first. Phone coverage is thin, and the richest finder and enrichment credits sit on add-ons rather than the base plans, so heavy data users pay extra. Full disclosure: Emelia is a partner we point people to for sequencing, and they run on the same European, GDPR-minded wavelength we do. The cleanest setup is to pair them. Enrow for verified emails and EU phones dropped into your CRM in one click, Emelia to send. As a standalone data source it's good, not specialist-grade, and it can't match Enrow's verification depth or EU phone coverage. The nice part in practice: warm-up and sending live right beside the found contacts, so an imported list reached a first touch without me opening a second tool.
- +Find, verify, enrich and send in one place (cold email + LinkedIn + warm-up)
- +Credits charged only when an email is actually found
- +Waterfall enrichment and Sales Navigator scraping built in
- +Unlimited sending and contacts on every plan; 7-day free trial
- –Thin phone coverage; it's not a dialing tool
- –Email-finding and enrichment credits lean on add-ons, so heavy data users pay extra
- –Data depth and verification trail a pure finder; no full-contact CRM export like Enrow's
Emelia pricing (EUR +20% to USD) opens at $44/mo for the Start plan, with dedicated finder credits on a pay-as-you-go add-on, around $23 for 1,000 finds, billed only when an email is found. That works out to about $0.023 per valid email, roughly 1.3x Enrow's $0.017 at the same volume; phones are just 20 numbers in that add-on, no EU direct-dial story.
vs Enrow: not really a price fight — Emelia is the sending partner we point people to, not a data rival. Enrow runs lower per valid, verifies 10+ ways, delivers documented EU direct dials Emelia doesn't, and files the full contact into your CRM in one click. Pair them: Enrow for the data, Emelia to send.
3. Hunter.io
The one I'd hand a junior SDR who's never touched a finder.
Hunter is email-first, mature and everywhere your CRM already integrates, with a genuine free plan and 100M+ professional addresses that come with public-source citations and confidence scores. It's the easiest tool here to start with.
The billing model is where it bites. Hunter charges for every search you run, not for a valid email it returns — and on Dropcontact's benchmark only about a third of Hunter searches come back with anything, so you pay for roughly three attempts to land one address. Then part of what does come back is a low-confidence pattern guess that bounces on the first send. You pay a lot, for not much, and some of the little you get is dead. Prospeo, by contrast, bills only on an email it actually finds, and Enrow charges strictly on a valid result, so a miss and a bounce both cost nothing. Crawled sources can mean stale or pattern-guessed emails for small firms. Phones are basically absent. You'll bolt on a second provider, and there's no full-contact CRM export. Against Enrow it trades accuracy and phones for a free tier and a long integration list. One thing Hunter still does better than anyone: the confidence scores and the "here's where we found this" citations are the most transparent sourcing in the category.
- +Real free plan (50 credits/mo) with no card
- +100M+ professional emails with public-source citations and confidence scores
- +Mature, widely-integrated API
- +Bulk finder and verifier in one place
- –No meaningful phone or mobile data
- –Charges for every search attempt, not per valid email; only about a third return anything, and some of those bounce
- –Crawled sources can mean stale or pattern-guessed emails for small firms
- –Subscription credits reset each cycle, they don't roll over; no full-contact CRM export
Hunter pricing (EUR 1:1 USD) starts at $49/mo for 2,000 credits, with a free 50-credit tier. But a credit is spent on every attempted search, hit or miss, and credits reset each cycle — so after a 32.5% find rate and 11.2% bounce on Dropcontact's public benchmark, a deliverable email really costs about $0.109, roughly 6.4x Enrow's Start ($0.017) and 12.5x Pro ($0.0087). Hunter returns no phones at all.
vs Enrow: Hunter bills the attempt, not the result, and brings no phones, weaker validation and no one-click CRM export. Enrow bills only on a valid result, so neither a miss nor a bounce ever costs you.
If you want Prospeo's headline entry sticker stripped down to one airtight job on email, this is it.
Anymailfinder does one thing: live-verified B2B emails, charged only when the address passes SMTP verification, with a bounce-refund guarantee. On the billing it's as clean as it gets, and it hard-verifies before a credit spends.
It's also narrow. No phones at all, no searchable database, no AI lead finder, no CRM export of a full contact card. This is a find-and-verify endpoint, not a platform. Where Prospeo at least bundles a Chrome extension and a mobile finder, Anymailfinder does email and nothing else, while Enrow keeps the verified-only billing and adds EU phones, real-time data and the one-click CRM export. What I appreciated on a deliberately messy list: the searches it couldn't verify simply didn't bill me, so the final invoice stayed honest.
- +Charged only for emails confirmed valid against the mail server
- +Bounce-refund guarantee and strong catch-all handling
- +Unused credits roll over without caps while subscribed
- +Duplicate searches within 30 days are free
- –Email-only, no phone finding
- –No searchable prospecting database and no full-contact CRM export
- –Credits forfeit when you cancel
Anymailfinder pricing (native USD) starts at $29/mo for 400 credits, billed only on emails that pass SMTP verification, so the sticker is the real cost — about $0.073 per valid email at the entry, dropping toward $0.008-0.010 at the 100k tier. That entry rate sits above Enrow's $0.017 on Start, and there are no phones at all.
vs Enrow: both are pay-per-valid, so the numbers are honest on each side, but Anymailfinder stays email-only — no phones, no database, no full-contact CRM export. Enrow matches the verified-only billing and adds GDPR-cleared EU phones, real-time data and the one-click export.
5. LeadMagic
The pick if your "tool" is actually a pipeline.
LeadMagic is API-shaped: 15+ enrichment endpoints (email, mobile, company, profile, job-change) drawing from one shared credit pool, plus a CLI and an MCP server for AI-agent workflows. It bills pay-per-valid, no charge on a failed match, more honest at bulk than Prospeo.
But it's built for people who'd rather write a script than click a UI. Non-developers will struggle. Mobiles cost 5 credits each and EU/GDPR phone coverage isn't published, so EU reliability is a question mark (verify). Rollover only kicks in on Essential and above. There's no UI workflow, no LinkedIn extension that files a full contact into your CRM, which is where Enrow wins for a sales team rather than an engineer. The detail I liked most: every endpoint draws from the same credit balance, so reconciling spend across email, mobile and company calls never turned into a spreadsheet exercise.
- +Pay-per-valid, zero charge on failed matches
- +15+ endpoints from one shared credit pool
- +Developer tooling: API, CLI/TUI, MCP server
- +Mobile finder claims above-standard coverage
- –No rollover on the entry Basic plan
- –Phones cost 5x an email; no published EU/GDPR phone detail
- –It's an API, not a sales UI; no LinkedIn-to-CRM full-contact export
LeadMagic pricing (USD) starts at $49/mo for 2,000 credits (email 1 credit, mobile 5), deducted only on a successful result. That's about $0.0245 per valid email, roughly 1.6x Enrow's $0.017, and nearer $0.0274 once the ~10.6% benchmark bounce is priced in; phones are 5 credits each with no published EU/GDPR coverage (verify).
vs Enrow: both are pay-per-valid with real APIs, but Enrow comes in lower per valid at every tier and publishes documented EU direct dials where LeadMagic's European coverage is unpublished. Enrow also adds a rep-friendly UI and one-click CRM export LeadMagic's endpoints don't.
6. Snov.io
The pick if you want to search, find, verify and send from one place.
Snov.io is a full sales-outreach stack: a searchable B2B database, an email finder and a 7-tier verifier, plus drip campaigns, a CRM and LinkedIn automation. Next to Prospeo it's a different animal. For a team that wants one subscription instead of three tools, the breadth is the draw.
The trade-off is the one every stored database carries. Its records drift out of date the longer they sit unrefreshed, so finder accuracy on a live list trails the specialists, and you pay for a lot of product you may not touch if all you need is verified emails. On billing, Snov charges for the search itself, not for a verified deliverable — and only a minority of searches return a usable address, so you pay for the attempts before you even count the stale rows that bounce. There's no EU phone play here (phones sit in a separate token add-on), and LinkedIn automation is a paid add-on. Against Enrow you're choosing breadth over freshness and accuracy, and you still don't get GDPR-cleared EU dials or a one-click full-contact CRM export. In practice the filter-to-campaign flow inside one tool was genuinely convenient, right up until I noticed a meaningful share of the pulled emails wouldn't clear a verifier without a second pass.
- +Searchable B2B database plus finder and verifier in one place
- +Drip campaigns, CRM and LinkedIn automation built in
- +Free trial (50 credits) and unlimited team seats on paid plans
- +Annual billing knocks 25% off
- –Database-sourced data goes stale, so accuracy on a live list trails pure finders
- –It's a lot of platform if you only need verified emails
- –No EU phone coverage; phones are a separate token add-on; LinkedIn automation is a paid add-on ($69/mo per slot)
Snov.io pricing (USD) starts at $39/mo for 1,000 credits, but the meter runs on the search, not a verified deliverable — about $0.039 per attempted search. Assume a ~30% find rate (Snov publishes no benchmark, verify) plus stale-row bounce, and a deliverable email runs about $0.13, several multiples over Enrow's $0.017; phones are a separate token add-on with no EU direct-dial story.
vs Enrow: Enrow finds each contact fresh in real time and bills only on a valid result — a miss or a bounce costs nothing — and adds EU phones Snov doesn't sell. Snov bundles a sender and a database Enrow doesn't; that's the trade.
7. Kaspr
A fast LinkedIn grabber if you mostly want a number off a single profile.
Kaspr is a European, GDPR-minded Chrome extension that pulls phones and emails off LinkedIn profiles on a credit system, and it's quick for one-off lookups. The "unlimited B2B emails" headline is generous on paper — though it's fair-use capped at 10,000 emails per account per month, not truly unlimited.
Read the fine print, though. Those unlimited emails are generic company addresses, not direct personal work emails, and the phone and direct-email credits are capped and don't roll over. It's a single-profile tool, not a bulk pipeline. No full-contact export files the whole verified record into your CRM the way Enrow's does. Against Enrow you're getting a lighter, narrower grabber: fewer verification passes, no pay-per-valid guarantee, and a credit meter that resets each month. When I tested it, grabbing a single number off a profile was genuinely fast. Push it toward a bulk data layer and it stops being the right tool.
- +Fast LinkedIn Chrome extension for phones and emails
- +European, GDPR-aware company
- +Free plan to test (15 email / 5 phone credits a month)
- +Simple per-user pricing
- –"Unlimited emails" are fair-use capped at 10,000 per account per month, and they're generic company addresses, not direct work emails
- –Phone and direct-email credits capped, no rollover
- –Single-profile focus; no bulk pay-per-valid or full-contact CRM export
Kaspr pricing (USD, per user) runs $65/mo ($49 annual) for Starter, and the "unlimited B2B emails" headline is fair-use capped at 10,000 per account per month (kaspr.io/terms) — and those are generic company addresses, not the direct work emails you want. It's priced per seat, not per credit, so there's no honest $/valid to state against Enrow.
vs Enrow: compare the models — a per-seat LinkedIn grabber with a fair-use ceiling versus Enrow's pay-only-for-valid credits with rollover. Enrow runs 10+ checks, delivers documented EU direct dials, and files the full contact into your CRM in one click.
8. Lusha
A mainstream database tool if you sell mostly into the US and like a browser extension.
Lusha is a large, well-known contact database with a Chrome extension that reveals emails and phone numbers on a credit system. It's easy to use and the brand is familiar to most SDRs.
It's also a stored database. That's the core difference from Prospeo and the bigger one from Enrow. The records sit until the next scheduled refresh, aging quietly in the meantime, so accuracy on a live list trails a real-time finder. Phones cost 10 credits each, coverage is strongest in the US and thinner in Europe, credits don't roll over, and pricing is per seat with renewal increases reported by users. Against Enrow you're buying a database you'll out-grow rather than fresh, pay-per-valid data with GDPR-cleared EU dials and a one-click full-contact CRM export. The extension itself is smooth to work with; the catch I hit was that a portion of the contacts it revealed were already out of date.
- +Large, recognizable B2B contact database
- +Easy Chrome extension for on-the-fly reveals
- +Free plan (40 credits/mo) to test
- +CRM integrations across the usual suspects
- –Stored database drifts out of date between refresh cycles; accuracy on a live list trails real-time finders
- –Phones 10 credits each, US-strong and thin in Europe; no rollover
- –Per-seat pricing with reported renewal increases; not pay-per-valid
Lusha pricing (USD, per seat) starts at $49.90/mo for 400 credits (phone reveals 10 credits, emails 1), but a credit spends on a reveal from a stored database whether or not the record is current. Haircut for staleness (~50-70% deliverable, verify) and the real cost per usable email lands nearer $0.18-0.25; phones run roughly $1.25 each, well above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark.
vs Enrow: Lusha sells a familiar US database; Enrow sells fresh, real-time data billed only on a valid result — cheaper per valid email and per valid phone, with documented EU dials, no per-seat fees, and one-click CRM export Lusha's reveal flow doesn't match.
9. ContactOut
Built for sourcing humans, not closing deals.
ContactOut's strength is a ~300M+ profile database with both work and personal emails, plus deep LinkedIn Chrome-extension integration. Recruiters genuinely rely on it, and personal emails surface contacts no work-email tool reaches.
It's a database-and-export tool, not a clean pay-per-valid finder. That's the trade. The binding limit is exports per month, there's no rollover or self-serve overage, phones (~100M direct dials) sit behind higher tiers, and EU coverage is weaker than US (verify). The "Exclude US/UK Data 50% off" toggle tells you where the good data lives. Against Enrow it wins for recruiting reach and loses for sales: no real-time freshness, no GDPR-cleared EU dials, no pay-per-valid, no one-click full-contact CRM export. For me the personal emails are the whole reason to reach for it, and that's a recruiting job, not a sales one.
- +~300M+ profiles, work and personal emails
- +Strong LinkedIn Chrome extension and Search Portal
- +~100M direct dials in database
- +Popular and genuinely proven for recruiting
- –Export-capped, fair-use model with no rollover
- –Phones locked behind higher tiers; EU coverage weaker than US
- –Not a pay-per-valid model; no full-contact CRM export for sales
ContactOut pricing (USD) starts at $49/mo ($39 annual) for the Email plan, but it bills on monthly export quotas from a stored crawl, not per verified deliverable, so the meter runs whether or not a record is current. There's no published $/valid — treat tier price ÷ export cap as a floor and the real cost per usable contact as higher; phones (~100M direct dials) sit behind higher tiers and lean US.
vs Enrow: ContactOut wins recruiting reach with personal emails; Enrow wins the sales-data job — billed only on a valid result, found in real time, with GDPR-cleared EU dials and one-click CRM export ContactOut's export model doesn't do.
10. Cognism
The enterprise option if you have the budget and a procurement team.
Cognism is a large, compliant B2B database with strong EU coverage and, on its Diamond tier, phone-verified mobile numbers. For a big sales org that wants one contracted data vendor with intent data on top, it's a serious tool.
The catch is the commitment and the cost. Cognism doesn't publish pricing; reported figures run roughly $15,000-$25,000 a year on annual contracts, with per-seat fees, a base platform fee, onboarding, and reported 10-15% renewal increases. And it's still a database, refreshed on a cycle, so the freshness problem applies even with verified mobiles. Against Enrow it's a different purchase entirely: a five-figure annual contract for a stored list versus pay-per-valid, real-time data from $17/month with GDPR-cleared EU dials and a one-click full-contact CRM export. When I looked at the verified EU mobiles, the coverage was real and the compliance story was reassuring — but the contract and the price put it out of reach for most of the teams reading this. For most, the number alone settles it. For an enterprise that needs a single contracted vendor, it has a case.
- +Strong EU contact and company data with compliance focus
- +Phone-verified mobile numbers on the Diamond tier
- +Intent data and enterprise features available
- +Single contracted vendor for big orgs
- –No public pricing; reported ~$15,000-$25,000/yr, annual contract only
- –Per-seat plus base platform fee, onboarding, and reported renewal increases
- –Still a stored database; not pay-per-valid, no full-contact CRM export
Cognism pricing has no public rate card; reported ~$15,000-$25,000/yr depending on tier (Platinum/Diamond), annual contract, per-seat plus base fee (verify). It sells a licence to query a database, not a per-result meter, so there's no honest $/valid — divide a reported ~$18,000/yr by even a generous annual pull and the effective cost per contact lands far above a pay-per-valid finder, on stored data that decays between refreshes.
vs Enrow: a five-figure annual commitment for a stored list versus pay-per-valid, real-time data from $17/month. Enrow's verified mobiles are GDPR-cleared EU direct dials billed only when found, with no contract, no per-seat fee, and one-click CRM export.
11. Apollo.io
The pick when you want to browse a database and build lists inside one platform.
Apollo bills itself as "the AI sales platform for smarter, faster revenue growth," and the breadth is real. A searchable B2B database of 270M+ contacts sits next to sequencing, a dialer, email and a built-in CRM. Next to Prospeo it's a bigger animal. For a team that wants to search, build a list and start sending from one login, the all-in-one pull is genuine.
The trade-off is the one every stored database carries, and it's the reason Apollo lands here rather than higher. The data is a saved snapshot, refreshed on a cycle, so it goes stale between pulls. On a live list the email accuracy trails the specialist finders, and you're calling people who already moved on. Phone data is largely unverified, EU coverage and DNC screening lean US/UK, and credits expire each cycle with no rollover. Per-seat pricing stacks up fast once a team is on it.
Apollo is a platform, not a clean data layer. That's the split with Enrow. There's no full-contact, one-click CRM export the way Enrow does it, no pay-per-valid guarantee, and no GDPR-cleared EU direct dials. Running it, the search-to-sequence flow inside one tool felt smooth — but part of the found emails wouldn't survive a fresh validation run, and the EU mobiles I spot-checked came back sparse.
- +Large searchable B2B database (270M+ contacts) for list-building
- +Sequencing, dialer, email and a built-in CRM in one platform
- +Free plan to test, with monthly credits
- +Familiar, widely-adopted all-in-one for SDR teams
- –Database is a stored snapshot that ages between refresh cycles; email accuracy on a live list trails the specialist finders
- –Phone data largely unverified; no GDPR-cleared EU direct dials, DNC screening US/UK-leaning
- –Credits expire each cycle with no rollover; per-seat pricing stacks up across a team
- –No full-contact, one-click CRM export the way Enrow does it
Apollo pricing (USD, per seat, annual) starts at $49/seat/mo ($65 monthly) for Basic, 2,500 unified credits (email 1, mobile 8) that don't roll over. On a realistic 78% utilization an email works out to about $0.033 per valid email — roughly 2x Enrow's $0.017 on Start, before the per-seat stacking; mobiles are stored, US-leaning numbers with no GDPR EU direct-dial product behind them.
vs Enrow: Apollo is the all-in-one, Enrow is the data layer. Enrow's phones are pay-per-valid GDPR-cleared EU direct dials at about $0.35 on Pro, its real-time data beats a stored DB on a live send, and there are no per-seat fees. Run both if you want the suite plus clean data, from $17/month.
12. Findymail
A good pick if your single priority is email accuracy and you sell mostly into the US.
Findymail is one of the more accurate email finders going, and like Prospeo it charges only for emails it actually finds. On a US list the hit rate is high and the bounce rate is low, a notch above where Prospeo's data lands once you push into volume.
But the walls come quick. Findymail returns no phone data for EU contacts because GDPR closes that off, so for a European dialing team it's email-only, and phones elsewhere are thin at 10 credits each. Rollover caps at 2x your monthly allowance. Buy ahead for a big quarter and you can watch credits expire. It's also pricier than Prospeo at the entry tier, with no one-click CRM export of the full contact. Enrow matches the email accuracy, adds GDPR-cleared EU phones, rolls credits over, and files the whole verified record into your CRM. My read after a week on it: the US email accuracy is genuinely excellent, and that's roughly the edge of what it does.
- +Among the more accurate email finders in the category
- +Charged only on a valid find
- +SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR-compliant, EU-hosted
- +Integrations with Instantly, lemlist, HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive
- –No phone data for EU contacts (GDPR); phones thin and US-leaning elsewhere
- –Credit rollover capped at 2x the monthly allowance
- –Entry slider starts at $49/1,000, about 2.9x Enrow's per-valid email at that volume, and no full-contact CRM export
- –No searchable database for list-building
Findymail pricing (USD) runs on one self-serve slider from $49/mo (1,000 finder credits) up to $849/mo (100,000), charged only on a found result. The $49/1,000 entry is about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 2.9x Enrow's $0.017 at that volume, falling to about $0.020 at the $99/5,000 tier and converging only near 100,000; phones run 10 credits each but Findymail returns no EU mobiles at all (GDPR).
vs Enrow: on found email Findymail is plainly pricier per valid at matched volume, and above Enrow up until roughly 100,000. Enrow returns the GDPR-cleared EU phones Findymail can't, keeps catch-alls instead of dropping them, opens at $17 for 1,000 emails, and does the one-click full-contact CRM export.
13. Dropcontact
The European compliance hawk's choice.
Dropcontact assembles and checks each record on the fly through its own algorithms instead of reselling a warehoused list, and it's strong on French specifics (SIREN, VAT) with a high valid-email rate. That real-time approach puts it philosophically nearer Enrow than to any database tool. For scrubbing a French HubSpot or Pipedrive, it's a solid choice.
But it's enrichment-first, not a finder you point at LinkedIn like Prospeo, and phones are weak, pulled only from email-signature extraction, with the GDPR-first model constraining EU mobile coverage. There's no searchable database, and its rollover plan opens at about €29/mo (~$35) for 500 credits. Against Enrow you get French firmographics but not real EU direct-dial phones, not 10+ verification checks, not the one-click full-contact CRM export, and you pay several times more per valid contact. The richest French firmographic data of the bunch is what stayed with me after the test.
- +GDPR-compliant, EU-server real-time enrichment
- +High valid-email rate, strong on catch-all
- +French-specific data (SIREN, VAT)
- +CRM-native enrichment across HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho
- –Weak phone capability (signature-extraction only), no real EU direct dials
- –No searchable database for list-building
- –Entry runs about 4x Enrow per valid email; no full-contact CRM export
Dropcontact pricing (EUR +20% to USD) opens at about $35/mo (€29) for 500 credits on a pay-on-success model, so a credit spends only on a found email. That's about $0.070 per valid email, roughly 4x Enrow's $0.017 — the priciest entry among the near-peers here — closing toward $0.016 near 100,000 but never dropping under Enrow; phones come only from scraping email signatures, so there's no real $/phone.
vs Enrow: Dropcontact cleans EU records well but barely does phones, and stays above Enrow at every tier. Enrow adds real EU direct dials, US coverage, one-click CRM export, and pay-per-valid billing.
Don't take my word for any of it — put your own list in front of Enrow and read the results. 50 free credits, refilled every month, no card.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Final verdict
Weigh the whole list against the real job — verified emails and phones, Europe included, billed only on a real result — and Enrow wins this list. Prospeo buys you a headline entry and a quick extension, but quality wobbles at volume, credits expire, and the EU phones aren't there. Both bill only on a found email, so both stickers are honest. But Enrow is cheaper at the door and per valid: $0.017 per valid email against Prospeo's $0.0245, plus GDPR-cleared EU dials and rollover Prospeo can't match. And the one thing no rival here does: a single click turns a LinkedIn profile into the complete verified contact, phone included, sitting in your CRM. Enrow isn't an all-in-one, though — no database, no sequencing — and Prospeo holds up only for sticker-price US email at low volume. But for the data layer underneath, landing in your CRM already complete, the answer on this page is Enrow.
Don't take my word for any of it — put your own list in front of Enrow and read the results. 50 free credits, refilled every month, no card.
Everything you need to know
Is Prospeo a good email finder?
What are the best free Prospeo alternatives?
Does Prospeo find phone numbers, and does it cover Europe?
How does Prospeo pricing compare to Enrow?
Which Prospeo alternative has the best Chrome extension?
Is there a Prospeo alternative with EU phone numbers?
How we evaluated these tools
There are no affiliate links on this page, and nobody paid to top the list. The method was deliberately plain: one 500-contact list, fed through every tool inside a single week, so no tool got an easier sample than the next. Four things decided the ranking — how many contacts each tool actually matched, how many bounced on a real send, what a valid contact truly cost once the dead rows were stripped out, and how far the coverage stretched geographically, with legally-sourced EU phones weighted heavily because that's where most finders quietly fall down. Competitor pricing and features come from official pages as read on 2026-07-02, and anything I couldn't confirm live is marked "verify."
bereit, keine zeit mehr zu verschwenden?
Verbunden in Minuten.
Verifizierte Daten in Sekunden.
keine Kreditkarte
kein Setup nötig