airscale alternatives

9 Best AirScale Alternatives for B2B Prospecting in 2026

We evaluated 9 alternatives on the four things that decide an outbound budget: match rate, bounce on a live send, real cost per valid contact, and EU phone coverage. Same list, same week, every tool. AirScale is a young tool with a thin public review trail, so treat its ratings as early rather than settled.

Get 50 free credits

9 tools tested

updated July 6, 2026

14 min read

Key takeaway

AirScale bundles sourcing, waterfall enrichment and AI agents on one mixed-credit meter. Handy. But a credit isn't a valid contact, and the meter doesn't wait to see if the email lands before it charges.

The switch is Enrow: verified emails plus GDPR-cleared EU direct dials, found in real time and billed only when the result is valid, from $17/month, with Pro at ~$0.0087 per valid email. Its Chrome extension drops the whole verified contact from LinkedIn into your CRM in one click. And the free tier refills: 50 credits, every month.

The alternatives at a glance

Enrow
Verified emails + EU phones, pay only for valid
$17/mo (1,000 credits)
50 credits/mo, no card
Emelia
Finding + sending from one login
~$44/mo
Free trial
Apollo
All-in-one database + sequencer
$59/seat/mo
900 credits/yr
LeadMagic
API-first enrichment, one credit pool
$49/mo (2,000 credits)
100 credits
Prospeo
LinkedIn lookups with costly misses
$49/mo (2,000 credits)
100 credits/mo
Snov
Finder + sender bundle
$39/mo (1,000 credits)
50 credits
Anymailfinder
Pay-per-verified email, nothing else
$29/mo (400 credits)
Trial credits
Findymail
US cold-email addresses, pay-per-found
$49/mo (1,000 credits)
10 trial credits
Dropcontact
GDPR-first EU email enrichment
~$35/mo (500 credits, no rollover)
50-credit trial

for verified emails and EU phones you only pay for when they're valid, Enrow is the move: $17/month in, with Pro at about $0.0087 per valid email, and no credit burned on a miss. The AirScale mixed-credit waterfall looks smaller on the page and rarely is once you count what didn't land. The other seven each hold one lane. Emelia if you must send from the same login, Apollo if you want the whole motion in one dashboard, Dropcontact if a French CRM needs cleaning under strict compliance. Route by niche below; none of them is the better overall buy.

Why teams look for AirScale alternatives

AirScale packs a lot into one screen, and people still leave it for three reasons that don't go away. Stack more automation on top and none of that improves. The bill just gets bigger.

The credit isn't a valid contact. Mixed credits spend on sourcing and on every enrichment attempt, and nothing on the page says you pay only when the email is real. Enrow's meter moves on a valid result and nowhere else.
Waterfall data ages on someone else's clock. You're renting other databases, refreshed when they feel like it. Enrow finds and verifies in real time instead.
No EU direct dials with paperwork. If your reps call into Europe, AirScale doesn't hand you a compliant mobile. That's half a prospecting motion.

Conflict of interest disclosure

Enrow is mine, and it's sitting at #1 on a list I wrote. Now you know my bias as well as I do, so read on with that in hand.

Here's what I won't pretend: several tools below do more than Enrow. AirScale sources, enriches, runs AI agents; Apollo bolts a whole sequencer to a database; Emelia sends your campaigns. We build none of that, deliberately. One product, one fixation: the most accurate emails and direct dials money can buy, verified before you're charged a cent. That narrow scope is the reason the data holds up, not a hole in the lineup. Want the full suite in one tab? A tool below fits, and I'll say which. Want the data underneath to actually be right? That's the whole point of Enrow.

The 9 best AirScale alternatives

1. Enrow

#1

Full disclosure, said twice: this one is mine. And it exists because I got tired of paying to enrich files, finding a fraction, and eating bounces on the rest.

That's the whole argument against a mixed-credit waterfall. AirScale spends credits to source and to try, valid or not. Enrow charges when the address is verified and deliverable, and at no other moment. A miss is free. A bounce is free, because a bad address never counts as valid to begin with.

Phones are the gap AirScale can't fill. Enrow's Direct Phone Finder returns dials in the US and across Europe, where we hold the legal documentation to source EU mobiles. Most of this list treats a French or German number as a shrug.

Then the move nobody else here makes. Open a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, click once, and the Chrome extension writes the complete verified record into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive: email, direct dial, every field. No copy-paste, no half-empty CRM card. And for the agent crowd there's an official MCP server (repo github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp), so Claude or Cursor can call the finder and verifier straight from a workflow; details on the API page.

Verification is where the two stop being comparable. A waterfall hands you whatever its providers return and calls it done. Enrow runs 10+ checks per address, multiple SMTP passes plus catch-all probes from servers in different regions, before anything counts. Catch-alls come back verified and usable, not stamped "risky" and dumped. On my mixed list, discovery landed around 60-70% and the live send bounced under 1%. Observed on that list, not a contract.

  • +Billed only on valid results; misses and bounces cost nothing
  • +US and EU direct dials, with the GDPR paperwork held for the European ones
  • +10+ verification checks per email; catch-alls verified and delivered
  • +One click moves the full verified contact from LinkedIn into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive
  • +Native Clay, HubSpot, Salesforce and Pipedrive integrations, plus a documented API and MCP server
  • +No per-seat fees; Pro and Scale credits roll over
  • No database to browse. Stored databases age, and you end up pitching people who already left; real-time lookup is the fix we chose, so list sourcing stays in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
  • No outreach sequencing. We won't build it; Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist handle the send.
  • Company data stops at LinkedIn depth. No technographics.
Ideal para: Verified emails + EU phones, pay only for valid

Three tiers, priced monthly. Start: 1,000 credits for $17 or 4,000 for $47 (monthly only). Pro: 10,000 for $87, 20,000 for $167, 30,000 for $247. Scale: 50,000 for $397, 80,000 for $597, 140,000 for $997, 200,000 for $1,397. Going annual trims Pro and Scale by about 10%, which puts 10,000 near $78/mo and 50,000 near $357/mo.

One credit buys one email. A phone runs 40 credits. A verification is 0.25, catch-all included. Nothing is charged unless the result is valid, so the cleaner comparison base is Pro: $87 buys 10,000 valid emails or 250 valid phones, about $0.0087 per email or $0.35 per phone. Start remains the $17 entry tier. Pro and Scale credits roll over.

The entry price isn't the point; volume is. A 12,000-email month sits around $107 on Enrow, between the Pro 10,000 ($87) and 20,000 ($167) tiers, and every one of those is a verified, deliverable address. AirScale's 12,000-credit Pro plan is $99, but a mixed credit isn't a valid email, so you're comparing finished contacts against attempts.

The free tier refills on its own: 50 credits every month, no card, for as long as you like. And since credits only burn on valid results, none of the 50 die on a guess.

Get 50 free credits

Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.

Emelia is a different job. It sends.

It's a sequencer with a finder bolted on: cold email, LinkedIn steps, warm-up, one login. AirScale builds lists; Emelia works them. This is where we point people who ask us for sequencing.

As a data source it's respectable rather than the reason to buy it. Finder credits burn on results found, phone coverage is thin, and heavier data use lands on add-on credit packs. The setup I actually recommend: Enrow finds and verifies, Emelia sends.

  • +Find, verify and send (cold email + LinkedIn + warm-up) in one place
  • +Finder credits charge on results found
  • +Sales Navigator scraping and waterfall enrichment included
  • +Unlimited sending and contacts on paid plans
  • Thin phone coverage; not a dialing tool
  • Heavy data use pushes into add-on credit packs
  • Outreach-first, so data depth trails the pure finders
Ideal para: Finding + sending from one login

Converted from EUR (+20%): Start about $44/month (3 mailboxes, 1 LinkedIn seat, 500 credits), Grow about $116, Scale about $356. A separate credits add-on runs about $23/month for 1,000 credits, where 1 credit finds an email, 50 credits a phone. Bigger PAYG packs are slider-computed (verify).

Because finder credits burn on found results, the sticker tracks real cost, but the finder lives in add-on packs, so your true $/valid email depends on the pack you buy (verify). Phones at 50 credits each are too coarse to price against a direct-dial tool.

vs Enrow: no contest on data, and Emelia wouldn't claim otherwise. Feed it Enrow's verified contacts at $0.017 apiece and both tools do their best work.

Apollo is the closest thing here to AirScale's "everything in one tab" pitch, only bigger and older: database, sequences, enrichment, a dialer, one subscription.

Against AirScale it's the heavyweight version of the same idea. You're buying a workflow with data inside it, and for a small team that wants outbound end to end without stitching tools together, the pitch is real.

The bill for the breadth is the data. Apollo is a stored database, so records age, and its reviews circle two complaints on repeat: accuracy and export caps. Mobiles are a thin per-seat ration. Getting from a filter to a live sequence in one sitting impressed me; checking those contacts against a live send is where real-time won.

  • +Large B2B database with sequencing and enrichment in one place
  • +Chrome extension and CRM integrations
  • +Workable free tier (900 credits/year per seat)
  • +One tool to source, enrich and send
  • Stored database, so records go stale and accuracy gripes recur in reviews
  • Credits are per seat; mobiles and exports draw down fast
  • Export caps bite before the lookups do
Ideal para: All-in-one database + sequencer

Apollo, per seat, billed annually: Free $0 (limited credits, ~5 mobile/mo), Basic $49/seat/mo, Professional $79, Organization $119 (minimum 3 seats). Monthly billing runs $59/$99/$149. Each paid seat carries a monthly credit pool — one credit per email reveal, eight per mobile — and unused credits don't carry into next month.

Apollo's credits are a per-seat monthly pool — one credit reveals an email, a mobile costs eight — and the pricing page won't foreground the catch: they don't roll over. Whatever a seat doesn't burn each month is gone at reset. On a roughly 2,500-credit seat that's about $0.026 a credit, but nobody drains the pool cleanly; count the ~22% that expires unused over a year and the real rate is about $0.033 per valid email, roughly 2× Enrow Start and 3.8× Pro. Then multiply by heads: five reps means five seats, about $325/month, five pools quietly lapsing. Phones don't rescue it. A mobile eats eight of those same credits and buys a stored, US-leaning reveal, not a compliant EU direct dial, so there's no per-number price worth flattering it with — the product your European reps need simply isn't in the box.

vs Enrow: buy Apollo for the cockpit if you want one, then let Enrow supply the layer it can't keep fresh. Enrow bills only on a valid result and nothing expires unused; Apollo bills a seat and lets the surplus lapse. On emails that's about $0.033 per valid against Enrow's $0.017 Start, real-time against a database that ages; on EU dials it's no compliant product against a documented one.

LeadMagic is AirScale's idea rebuilt for people whose "tool" is a pipeline.

It's API-shaped: 15+ enrichment endpoints (email, mobile, company, profile, job changes) drawing on one shared credit pool, with an MCP server for agent workflows. Credits deduct only on success, which is the right default and more honest than a mixed meter that charges to try.

It's also not something you hand a rep. There's no real UI to live in, EU phone coverage is unpublished (verify), and rollover starts one tier up. The docs read better than most tools' dashboards, which tells you exactly who it's for.

  • +Pay-per-valid: failed matches cost nothing
  • +15+ endpoints on one shared credit pool
  • +Developer tooling: API, CLI, MCP server
  • +Mobile finder included in the same pool
  • No rollover on the entry Basic plan
  • Mobiles cost 5× an email, with no published EU/GDPR phone detail (verify)
  • API-first, so non-developers will stall
Ideal para: API-first enrichment, one credit pool

LeadMagic: Basic $49/month (2,000 credits), Essential $99 (5,000; rollover starts here, up to 2 months), Growth $249 (20,000), Professional $499 (50,000), Ultimate $849 (100,000). Emails cost 1 credit, mobiles 5, validation 0.25, deducted only on success. Annual takes about 17% off.

Basic prices a valid email at about $0.0245, roughly 1.6× Enrow's $0.017 at matched volume — and because LeadMagic bills only on a match, that sticker sits close to real, unlike a per-search meter. Two honest adjustments still apply. Basic credits don't roll over (rollover starts at Essential), so the slice you leave unspent each month lifts the effective rate about 28%, toward $0.031. And an independent 20,000-contact benchmark puts LeadMagic's bounce near 10.6%: a real share of the addresses it calls valid still bounce on a live send, so a genuinely deliverable email costs about $0.0274 before that rollover penalty. Its low match rate on that same benchmark costs you reach, not money — a miss is free. A mobile lands near $0.12, but with no published EU coverage or quality documentation (verify) that ratio isn't comparable to a documented EU direct dial. Headline prices on unknowns are still unknowns.

vs Enrow: two honest per-valid meters, two audiences. Enrow matches the API story, then adds the rep-facing product AirScale users actually want: a UI, the extension, one-click CRM export, and EU phones with the paperwork behind them.

Prospeo's price is its whole pitch. Look past it.

Like AirScale, it leans on a waterfall to fill in emails, and on my list that waterfall found about 20% of the contacts. Enrow found 60-70%. No entry price survives that gap: when four in five targets come back empty, you finish the job somewhere else and pay twice.

The rest is what you'd expect at the price point. Quality gets uneven past small jobs, phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU coverage (verify), free-plan credits don't roll over, and pricing is per user.

  • +1 credit per found email, 0 on a miss
  • +Quick Chrome extension for LinkedIn and domains
  • +Verification included in the same credit pool
  • +Free plan (100 credits/month)
  • Found about 20% of my test list; most contacts simply don't come back
  • Phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU story (verify)
  • Per-user pricing stacks on teams
Ideal para: LinkedIn lookups with costly misses

Prospeo: Starter $49/month for 2,000 credits, Growth $99 (5,000), Pro $249 (15,000); annual runs about 25% cheaper. Mobiles cost 10 credits.

The sticker reads about $0.0245 per valid email on Starter, already 1.6× Enrow's $0.017 at matched volume. Prospeo bills 1 credit per found email and nothing on a miss, so — unlike a per-search meter that charges for the attempt — that low find rate doesn't inflate its price per valid: a valid still costs about $0.0245. What the low coverage costs you is reach, not money. On my list Prospeo returned about a fifth of the contacts, so you get a fifth of your list at $0.0245 and go buy the other four-fifths somewhere else, paying that second tool on top. The dollars per Prospeo email hold; the coverage doesn't. Phones work out near $0.49 on paper with nothing documented behind them (verify).

vs Enrow: the sticker already runs above Enrow, and the find rates live on different planets. Enrow's $0.017 with 60-70% discovery buys a finished list, not a fifth of one.

6. Snov

Snov sells the bundle: finder, verifier, drip campaigns, a light CRM, one modest bill.

Fair pitch for a solo user with loose data standards. But the meter is the catch: Snov charges per search attempt, not per valid found, so you pay whether or not an address comes back, and most attempts on a cold list don't. What does come back leans on stored rows that drift stale, so a slice of it was dead before you bought it. A visible share of my Snov finds needed a second verification pass before I'd send to them.

  • +Finder, verifier, drip campaigns and CRM in one subscription
  • +Searchable prospect database included
  • +Unlimited team seats on paid plans
  • +Annual billing cuts 25%
  • Billed per search attempt, not per valid found, so misses still cost you
  • No EU phone play; phones are a separate token add-on
  • A lot of platform if verified emails are all you need
Ideal para: Finder + sender bundle

Snov: Starter $39/month (1,000 credits), Pro S $99 (5,000), Pro M $189 (20,000), Pro L $369 (50,000), Ultra $738 (100,000+). Annual takes 25% off. Phones live in a separate token add-on.

Here's the model that matters: Snov bills per search attempt, not per valid found, so the $0.039-per-credit sticker is what you pay to try, whether or not an address comes back. With no benchmark figure for Snov I'll assume the ~30% find rate typical of these per-search finders (stated as an assumption) — meaning only about one attempt in three returns anything, so your bill is roughly 3× the sticker before you send a single email: a found address costs about $0.13. That's the first penalty. The second: part of what does come back is stale and bounces, and Snov's monthly credits don't roll over, so both push that $0.13 higher still. You pay a lot, for not much, and some of the little you get is dead — several times Enrow's $0.017 per valid, where a miss and a bounce each cost nothing.

vs Enrow: Snov is the headline wrapper; the data inside is the weak part. Enrow is only the data, fresh and billed on valid, and it pairs with any sender, Snov's included.

Anymailfinder strips AirScale down to one honest job.

Verified emails, charged only when the address passes verification. No phones, no database to browse, no CRM push. One credit buys one found email, checking an outside address is cheaper, and unused credits roll over while you stay subscribed. The meter is clean and the scope fits in a sentence. On a messy list the unverifiable rows cost me nothing, which kept the bill small.

  • +Charged only for emails confirmed valid
  • +Strong catch-all handling
  • +Credits roll over while subscribed
  • +Simple single, bulk or API access
  • Email-only, no phones at all
  • Entry sits at $0.049 per valid email, roughly 3× Enrow's rate
  • No CRM push or contact export to speak of
Ideal para: Pay-per-verified email, nothing else

Priced in USD: Standard from $29/month (400 credits) through $49 (1,000) and $89 (2,000); Scale $149 (5,000) and $199 (10,000); Ultimate $299 (25,000) up to $799 (100,000). Annual runs roughly a third cheaper. One credit buys one found email.

Per-found billing keeps the sticker honest: the $49 tier works out to about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 3× Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume, easing toward $0.020 at the 10,000 tier and near Enrow only up at 100,000. Honest meter, entry rate well above Enrow's.

vs Enrow: same billing philosophy, half the product, and about triple the entry rate per valid email. Match the volume and Enrow undercuts it, then adds the phones and CRM export Anymailfinder never set out to build.

I'll give Findymail its due: it's a real email finder, and on US addresses it performs.

It also bills the way a waterfall should and rarely does. Charged on the found, verified result, nothing on a miss, nothing on a bounce. Point it at a domain list or a LinkedIn export and what comes back tends to survive a live send. We go deeper on the matchup in our Findymail breakdown.

The ceiling is geography and the floor price. GDPR closed EU phones to Findymail, so for European calling it's a spectator, and phones elsewhere are sparse. The floor is $49/month for 1,000 credits, unused credits carry over only to 2× your monthly allowance, and there's no real free plan, just 10 trial credits. On my list its US addresses held up; the French half came back email-only.

  • +Charged on found, verified results, so a bounce never costs you
  • +Strong US B2B email accuracy
  • +SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR-compliant, EU-hosted
  • +Native HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Instantly and lemlist integrations
  • No EU phone data (GDPR-blocked); phones elsewhere are thin
  • Rollover caps at 2× the monthly allowance, so stockpiled credits die at renewal
  • No meaningful free plan; the floor is $49/month
Ideal para: US cold-email addresses, pay-per-found

Findymail is a single Starter slider: it opens at $49/month for 1,000 finder credits and steps up to $99 for 5,000 (the default card), then higher, with custom Enterprise above. Annual is about two months free. Phones cost 10 credits each; rollover is capped at 2× the monthly allowance.

Per-valid billing keeps the sticker honest: the $49 floor is about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 2.9× Enrow's $0.017 at the same 1,000-email volume, easing to $0.0198 at 5,000 and only nearing Enrow's rate up at 100,000. Phones price out near $0.20 on a raw-credit basis on paper, except the paper excludes Europe entirely, so on an EU-heavy list that number buys nothing.

vs Enrow: same honest meter, narrower map, higher entry rate. Enrow opens at $17 instead of $49, prices a valid email at $0.017 against Findymail's $0.049 at that volume, and returns the EU direct dials Findymail legally can't.

Dropcontact is the pick your DPO would make.

Everything runs under GDPR on EU servers, the data is computed fresh rather than pulled from a resold list, and it carries French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) most tools ignore. On emails it works pay-on-success: an address it can't find gets the credit reimbursed. For cleaning a French or European CRM, it's a fair specialist, and our Dropcontact page runs the full comparison.

But read the job description. Dropcontact enriches rows you already have; it isn't built to hunt a contact from scratch the way a finder is. Each processed contact consumes a credit, and phones only appear when one can be scraped out of an email signature, so there's no direct-dial product behind the promise. It cleaned my French rows nicely and produced two phone numbers for a hundred contacts.

  • +GDPR-first: EU servers, compliant by design
  • +Pay-on-success on emails; unfound addresses are reimbursed
  • +French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) built in
  • +CRM-native enrichment for HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho
  • Enriches existing rows; not a real-time finder for new contacts
  • Phones come only from signature scraping, no direct-dial product
  • ~$35 entry buys just 500 credits with no rollover; carry-over needs the pricier Growth plan
Ideal para: GDPR-first EU email enrichment

Dropcontact opens at €29/month, about $35 converted, for just 500 credits with no rollover. The next tiers add carry-over plus LinkedIn and company enrichment: €59 (~$71) for 1,500, €89 (~$107) for 4,000, €189 for 11,000, on up to €1,349 for 100,000; Enterprise is quote-only. Annual runs about 20% cheaper.

One credit per processed contact puts the entry math at about $0.070 per contact, roughly 4× Enrow's $0.017 at the same low volume, and the reimbursement only softens that on emails it fails to find. That entry tier's 500 credits also don't roll over, so whatever a slow month leaves unspent simply lapses; count that waste and the real entry rate is nearer $0.090. The multiple shrinks with volume — and on a rollover tier that penalty falls away — but it stays above Enrow, landing near 2× even up at 100,000. There's no per-phone figure to quote because there's no real phone product.

vs Enrow: the honest framing is enrichment versus finding. Dropcontact completes rows you already own and refunds the emails it misses; Enrow finds and verifies new contacts in real time at $0.017 per valid email against Dropcontact's ~$0.070 per processed row at entry, and returns documented EU direct dials instead of signature scraps.

Get 50 free credits

Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.

Side-by-side comparison

Enrow
Verified email + EU phones, pay-per-valid
$17/mo
Yes, documented
Whole contact, every field, LinkedIn → CRM in one click
Emelia
Find + send in one
~$44/mo
Minimal
Sequencer with a finder attached
Apollo
All-in-one workflow
$59/seat/mo
Limited, US-leaning
Filter to live sequence in one tab
LeadMagic
Scripted enrichment
$49/mo
Unpublished (verify)
15+ endpoints, one pool, MCP
Prospeo
Lookups with costly misses
$49/mo
Undocumented (verify)
Headline sticker, costly coverage gap
Snov
Finder + sender bundle
$39/mo
No
Database + drip in one bill
Anymailfinder
Verified email only
$29/mo
No phones
Bills only verified finds
AirScale
All-in-one sourcing + waterfall
$49/mo
No (verify)
Mixed credits, AI agents, rollover
Findymail
US cold email, pay-per-found
$49/mo
No (GDPR-blocked)
Accurate US emails, honest meter
Dropcontact
GDPR-first EU enrichment
~$35/mo
Signature-scraped only
Pay-on-success EU enrichment

How to choose

Nine tools, one honest sorting question: what does your team actually do all day?
You need verified emails and EU direct dials, paid only when valid → Enrow
You need to find and send from one login → Emelia, fed by Enrow's data
You need one all-in-one dashboard for the whole motion → Apollo, with Enrow as its data layer
You need enrichment endpoints inside a pipeline → LeadMagic
You are tempted by the lowest-looking sticker → price the usable results first; Enrow is the lowest real-cost option per valid contact
You need verified email lookups and nothing else → Anymailfinder
You need US-only cold email and never dial → Findymail, though Enrow opens $32/month cheaper
You need GDPR-clean enrichment of an existing EU CRM → Dropcontact
You need to source a list from zero → none of these is a searchable database; that's LinkedIn or Sales Navigator
And when it's time to send, pair whichever data tool you pick with Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist.

Final verdict

AirScale packs sourcing, waterfall enrichment and AI agents onto one tidy meter, and the tidiness is the trap. A mixed credit isn't a valid contact, the waterfall rents data that ages on someone else's schedule, and there's no compliant EU direct dial anywhere in the box. The moment cost-per-valid or dialing into Europe enters the conversation, you've outgrown it. Enrow is the switch: verified emails and documented EU direct dials, found in real time, from $17/month, charged only when the result is real. It won't hand you a browsable database or send your sequences; we left those jobs to LinkedIn and to senders like Emelia on purpose, because doing data only is why the data holds up. And nobody else on this page does the last trick: one click in the Chrome extension turns a LinkedIn profile into a complete verified contact, phone included, sitting in your CRM. Take the 50 free credits you get back every month and let your own list decide.

Get 50 free credits

Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.

Everything you need to know

What's the best free alternative to AirScale?

Is AirScale worth paying for?

What's the most accurate AirScale alternative?

Does AirScale find phone numbers?

How much does AirScale cost compared to Enrow?

Can I export contacts from LinkedIn into my CRM?

How we evaluated these tools

Nobody paid to be here. No affiliate links, no sponsored slots, and the winner wasn't for sale. Every tool processed the same contact list inside the same week, and four measures decided the order: how many contacts actually came back, how many addresses bounced on a live send, what a valid contact really costs once bad results are priced in, and whether the tool can produce legally-sourced EU phone numbers. Competitor prices come from official pricing pages read on 2026-07-06; anything I couldn't confirm on a live page carries a "verify" mark.

Match rateHow many contacts actually came back on the same list.
Bounce on a live sendHow many addresses bounced when you actually send.
Real cost per valid contactWhat a valid contact really costs once bad results are priced in.
EU phone coverageWhether the tool can produce legally-sourced EU phone numbers.

pronto para passar à velocidade superior?

Ligado em minutos.
Data verificada em segundos.

sem cartão

sem setup