13 Best AeroLeads Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026

One login for a database, a dialer's worth of mobiles, and an email sequencer.

Apollo is what a lot of teams graduate to when AeroLeads feels too thin. Same core idea (a big stored database you filter and reveal from) but far larger, wrapped in a sequencer, a Chrome extension and a CRM sync. Where AeroLeads gives you a cheap finder, Apollo gives you a whole outbound cockpit. For a team that wants prospecting and sending under one bill, it's a real step up from a crawl-and-save tool.

The catch is the same one that sits under every database: freshness and billing. Apollo's data is stored, US-leaning, and its mobiles come from the same shelf that ages between refreshes. Credits are pooled per seat and don't roll over, so whatever you don't use each cycle is gone, which quietly inflates the real per-contact price. There's no documented GDPR EU direct-dial story either; the European mobiles are hit-or-miss and thin on paperwork.

When I ran it, the sequencer and the sheer database size were the draw, no argument. But a slice of the revealed mobiles were stale, and the "no rollover" rule meant the effective cost sat above the headline. Enrow doesn't sell a database or a sequencer at all. It finds each contact live and bills only when the email or phone checks out. Different tool for a different job, and on the data itself Enrow is the sharper instrument.

Best for: All-in-one database, sequencer and mobile reveals

Pricing

Apollo pricing. USD, per seat, from about $49 per user per month on annual billing, with an email at 1 credit and a mobile reveal at 8.

The credit pool doesn't roll over, so at realistic utilization (~78%) a valid email effectively runs near $0.033 (verify), about 2x Enrow's Start rate and 3.8x its Pro, and the per-seat model means five reps pay five bills.

vs Enrow: Apollo runs roughly 2x Enrow's per-valid cost at entry and widens at volume. Enrow bills only on valid, rolls credits over on Pro and Scale, returns documented EU direct dials Apollo's stored mobiles can't match, and files the full verified contact into your CRM from a LinkedIn profile in one click.

Sharp US email, and you only pay when it finds one.

Findymail is a genuine near-peer on email finding, and it's the honest opposite of AeroLeads on billing: it charges on the found result, not on a saved record. Feed it a LinkedIn list or a domain, get back verified business addresses. On US accuracy it's one of the better finders in the category, and I'll say that flat out, because it's true.

Where it stops is geography and phones. There are no EU mobile numbers, because Findymail treats GDPR as a hard wall, so for a Europe-facing team it's effectively email-only. Phones elsewhere run thin. And rollover caps at 2x your monthly allowance, so buying ahead for a big push means the surplus dies at renewal.

On the send, the US addresses held and the meter stayed honest, with no phantom charges for records that never resolved, which is exactly what AeroLeads gets wrong. What never appeared was a single European direct dial. Enrow runs the same pay-per-found logic on email, then goes where Findymail won't: EU phones with paperwork, catch-alls delivered, and the whole record filed into your CRM off a profile.

Best for: Accurate US cold-email, pay-per-found

Pricing

Findymail pricing. USD, from $49/mo for 1,000 finder credits, charged only on a found address, so the sticker sits close to the real cost per valid.

That real cost still runs well above Enrow's: $49 across 1,000 emails is about $0.049 per valid email, roughly 2.9x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and 5.6x its $0.0087 at Pro.

vs Enrow: same pay-per-found philosophy, but Findymail is plainly pricier per valid and can't return an EU dial. Enrow sources those with the legal paperwork, delivers catch-alls, and opens at $17 for 1,000 where Findymail's door is $49.

Give it a domain, get addresses back with a note on where each pattern was seen.

Hunter is the tool most people meet first. Hand it a domain, or a name plus a company, and it returns addresses each carrying a confidence score and a source citation. Against AeroLeads it wins on transparency, since it shows its working, and it has a real free tier. For clean domain-level lookups feeding a sender you already run, it's a low-friction pick.

The problem is the billing and what slips through it. Hunter charges per attempted search: the credit spends whether or not an address comes back. On Dropcontact's public 20,000-contact benchmark (a vendor-run test that conveniently ranks its own author first, so discount it accordingly), Hunter found 32.5% of a list and 11.2% of what it did return went on to bounce. You pay for every attempt, most hand back nothing, and part of the rest is dead. Crawled patterns also thin out on smaller companies. Phones? None at all.

After a run my read was simple: the citations are the best thing here, quick trust next to every address. Everything else leans Enrow's way. Hunter's looser validation lets guesses through to your sender, there's no live lookup, no phone product, and nothing like a one-click full-record CRM push. Enrow checks 10+ ways before it bills, and it only bills when the result is valid.

Best for: Domain email with source citations

Pricing

Hunter pricing. EUR charged 1:1 in USD, from $49/mo for 2,000 credits, with a free 50-credit tier. But Hunter bills per attempted search, so the sticker hides the bill.

After a 32.5% find rate, 11.2% bounce and no rollover, a deliverable email really costs about $0.109, roughly 6.4x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and 12.5x its $0.0087 at Pro. With no phone data anywhere, there's no $/phone to compute.

vs Enrow: Hunter bills the attempt, not the result, and returns no phones. Enrow bills nothing on a miss, verifies harder, and returns the EU dials Hunter never had.

Enrichment for teams whose buyer reads a code review before a demo.

LeadMagic is shaped like an API: 15+ endpoints (email, mobile, company, profile, job-change) drawing on one shared pool, plus a CLI and an MCP server for agent work, and credits that only move on a successful result. Where AeroLeads gives a rep a click-to-save UI, LeadMagic gives a developer something to build against. The niche is RevOps teams who reach for a script before a dashboard.

I wired its email and mobile endpoints into a test script against my list. The accounting audited cleanly (one pool, debits only on hits), and pay-per-valid is the right default, the direct opposite of AeroLeads' charge-on-add. But this is plumbing, not a rep tool; non-developers stall. Mobiles cost 5 credits, EU/GDPR phone coverage goes unpublished (verify), and rollover only kicks in at the Essential tier.

Enrow speaks the same languages, a real API and an MCP server so Claude or Cursor can pull verified contacts mid-flow. Then it adds what LeadMagic skips: a UI a rep can actually drive, a Chrome extension that files the whole record into the CRM, and EU dials with the legal documentation held. Programmable without forcing everyone to code.

Best for: API-first enrichment, one credit pool

Pricing

LeadMagic pricing. USD, from $49/mo for 2,000 credits (email 1, mobile 5, validation 0.25), deducted only on a successful result.

That's about $0.0245 per valid email, and once the benchmark's 10.6% bounce and Basic's expiring credits fold in, the effective entry figure climbs toward $0.035, against Enrow's $0.017. Phones take 5 credits with no published EU coverage.

vs Enrow: both bill per valid and ship real APIs and MCP servers, the fairest head-to-head here, but Enrow comes in lower, holds documented EU dials LeadMagic lacks, and adds a rep-friendly UI plus the one-click full-record CRM push.

Big reach, one credit per lookup, hit or miss.

RocketReach sells breadth: a large stored database that returns emails and phone numbers, with a single credit spent per lookup attempt. It reaches more names than AeroLeads and covers both email and phone in one place, which makes it a tempting one-stop for a team that dials as much as it emails. That's the pitch, and it's a fair one on coverage.

The billing is where it turns. A credit spends on the attempt, found or not, so misses cost the same as hits. Phone find rates on a stored database run modest (assume around 30%, verify), and credits don't roll over, so the effective cost per working number climbs hard. There's no documented EU direct-dial coverage either, so a European mobile that comes back is a gamble on both accuracy and provenance.

Testing it, the reach was real and the interface fine, but the per-attempt meter and stale mobiles added up. A "found" number that rang a dead line still cost a credit. Enrow's phone credit only burns on a valid dial, the EU numbers carry legal paperwork, and there's no attempt tax. So you buy RocketReach for the sheer size of its net, then pay again for every empty haul it pulls up.

Best for: Broad database reach, email + phone

Pricing

RocketReach pricing. USD, from $33/mo annual (email-only), Pro $75/mo for email + phones, one credit per lookup charged per attempt.

Run the phone math: a ~30% find rate (verify) and no rollover land a working mobile near $2 per valid mobile, roughly 6x Enrow's $0.35 at Pro, and email bills per attempt too, so the sticker understates the deliverable cost.

vs Enrow: RocketReach charges for the attempt; Enrow charges for the result. On working mobiles the gap is wide (near $2 versus about $0.35), Enrow's EU dials carry documentation RocketReach's don't, and only Enrow files the whole verified record into your CRM from a LinkedIn profile.

One click on a profile and a number pops back, fast, if not always current.

Lusha is built for speed: a browser extension, a browsable B2B database, and one-click reveals that make it a favorite with reps who don't want to think about credits. Compared to AeroLeads it's slicker and more phone-forward, and for a small US team that lives in LinkedIn it feels frictionless. The reveal-and-go workflow is genuinely easy.

Underneath it's a stored database with the usual costs. Reveals are billed whether the number still works or not, phone credits are pricey (a phone runs 10 of them), and European coverage is thin with no strong GDPR direct-dial story. Pricing is per seat, so a team multiplies the bill quickly. The reveals are quick; a share of them are quietly out of date.

I pulled a batch through the extension: snappy, fine on big US accounts, patchier once the roles got senior or European. Enrow doesn't sell a browsable list. It finds each number live, charges only on a valid result, and stands behind its EU dials with paperwork. Lusha is the faster reveal. Enrow is the number that actually connects.

Best for: Quick B2B phone reveals off LinkedIn

Pricing

Lusha pricing. USD, per seat, from around $52/mo on annual billing for roughly 600 credits, a phone reveal costing 10.

Strip out the reveals that ring dead and a working phone lands around $1.25–$2.50 (verify), several times Enrow's $0.35 at Pro, and per-seat pricing means each rep carries their own bill.

vs Enrow: Lusha wins on reveal speed and loses on cost-per-working-contact, roughly $1.25–$2.50 per valid phone against Enrow's ~$0.35. Enrow's dials also carry EU documentation Lusha lacks, and only Enrow files the complete verified record into your CRM in one click.

The baseline. Here it is on its own terms, billing model and all.

AeroLeads finds emails, phones and company data off a stored, crawled database it markets at 750M+ profiles, with a Chrome extension that scrapes prospects from LinkedIn. It carries a few basic CRM connectors (HubSpot, Salesforce, Zoho, Mailchimp) and Zapier, but the product feels light and a little legacy: no MCP server, and the API and integration set are thin next to a modern data stack. For a small team that wants a cheap tool and "unlimited" searches, it does a job, and reviewers call it easy. I'll grant it the entry price and the ease.

Then the model. A credit is spent when you add a record (from search, LinkedIn or upload), and the finding and verification only run after that credit is gone. No email found? No refund. The address bounces? No refund. Unused credits don't roll into next month. Phones are a separate fixed allowance (80, 200 or 400 depending on tier), US-skewed, inconsistent internationally, with Canada described as very shallow and no confirmed EU direct dial. Reviewers also report the returned "direct dial" is sometimes just the company switchboard. Add documented accuracy complaints on both emails and phones, and the cheap sticker starts costing more than it looks.

For a solo user on a tight budget who mostly emails US contacts and doesn't mind eating the misses, AeroLeads can limp along. But paying per search, on a database where only about one lookup in five turns into a deliverable email, sits on the wrong side of the debate the whole market moved past. Enrow only bills when a valid contact comes back, and it finds that contact live rather than reviving a stale row.

Best for: Cheap crawl-DB email + phone, billed per search

Pricing

AeroLeads pricing. USD, monthly only, from $49/mo for the Take Off tier (2,000 credits + 80 phones, 1 user); the free trial is 10 one-shot credits.

But a credit burns when you pull a record, not when a valid email lands, and only about one search in five (~20%, verify) returns a deliverable address, so Take Off's real cost is about $0.12 per valid email — hitting 1,000 valid emails burns roughly 5,000 credits, near $122, where Enrow charges $17. That's 4.5x to 7x Enrow's $0.017 Start rate and 9x to 14x its $0.0087 Pro, and unused credits don't roll over.

vs Enrow: AeroLeads documents no EU dials, bills the lookup rather than the result, forfeits unused credits monthly, and offers nothing like a one-click full-record CRM export from a LinkedIn profile. Enrow inverts each of those.

Built to live inside LinkedIn, revealing emails and numbers as you browse.

ContactOut is a LinkedIn-first finder: a browser extension and a stored database that returns personal and work emails plus phone numbers as you move through profiles. Next to AeroLeads it's more LinkedIn-native and reaches personal emails well, which recruiters in particular like. For sourcing off LinkedIn at a steady clip, it fits the motion.

The model is the familiar stored-reveal one. Email and phone come from separate pools, one credit each, and a reveal is billed whether the contact still holds or not. There's a fair-use cap around 1,000 phones a month on the combined plan, and pricing is per seat. European direct-dial depth and GDPR documentation aren't its strength: the coverage skews US and the numbers age with the database.

Running it, the LinkedIn workflow was smooth and the personal-email hit rate was its standout. But the phone reveals were a mixed bag, and I paid for the dead ones alongside the live. Enrow finds each number in real time, bills only when it's valid, and stands behind the EU dials with paperwork. So ContactOut scrapes LinkedIn beautifully and still hands you numbers you can't fully trust. Enrow gives up the browsable list to make sure the ones it returns actually connect.

Best for: LinkedIn email + phone from a stored DB

Pricing

ContactOut pricing. USD, per seat, from around $79/mo on annual billing for the Email + Phone plan, with a fair-use cap near 1,000 phones/month and email and phone on separate pools.

Because reveals bill dead-or-alive, the real cost per working contact runs above the sticker, worst on European numbers (verify), and per seat a five-rep team pays five times over. There's no pay-per-valid safety net and no documented EU dial to anchor a fair $/valid-phone.

vs Enrow: ContactOut bills on the reveal; Enrow bills on the valid result, returns documented EU dials where ContactOut skews US, doesn't multiply the bill across a team, and files the full verified record into the CRM in one click.

A LinkedIn extension aimed squarely at small teams that want phone data without an enterprise contract.

Kaspr is a LinkedIn extension with a stored database behind it, pitched at SMB reps who want quick phone and email reveals without a heavy commitment. It's cheaper and lighter than the enterprise phone tools, and for a small European team working LinkedIn it's an accessible entry into phone data. The free tier lets you kick the tires.

Read the fine print, though. The "unlimited" B2B email on paid plans carries a fair-use cap around 10,000 per account per month, always worth stating, because "unlimited" isn't. Phone credits are a modest yearly allowance (roughly 100/month on Starter), and the reveals come from a stored database billed whether the number still works or not. And Kaspr was fined €240,000 by France's CNIL in December 2024 over how it scraped LinkedIn data, a compliance flag a European buyer should weigh seriously.

Testing it, the extension was quick and the entry price friendly, but the phone allowance ran out fast and a share of the numbers were stale. Enrow finds EU direct dials live, holds the legal documentation for them, and only charges when the number is valid, with no fair-use asterisk and no scraping fine hanging over it. Cheap and quick, yes. But between the email cap, the thin phone ration and a live CNIL fine, "compliant European phone data" is the one thing Kaspr can't honestly promise, and the one thing Enrow can.

Best for: LinkedIn phone extension for SMB reps

Pricing

Kaspr pricing. USD, per user, from $49/user/mo on annual billing for "unlimited" B2B email under a ~10,000/account/month fair-use cap, plus roughly 100 phone credits a month; the free tier gives 15 emails and 5 phones.

Strip the reveals that don't connect and a valid mobile lands near $0.56–$0.98 (verify), better than Lusha or RocketReach but still above Enrow's $0.35 at Pro, and the email cap means the plans aren't really unlimited either.

vs Enrow: Kaspr is cheaper at the door and narrower everywhere else, with a CNIL fine on the record. Enrow finds EU dials live with legal documentation, bills only on valid, and files the full record into your CRM.

LinkedIn email in small batches, one credit per hit.

Prospeo bundles a Chrome extension, a low sticker, and verification folded into its single credit pool. One credit per email it actually lands, zero when it whiffs, so on transparency it laps a charge-on-add tool like AeroLeads outright: a whiff costs you reach, never cash. Its lane is LinkedIn email at low-to-mid volume, a soft landing for a budget-sensitive team.

The asterisk is data quality and consistency. Push past small jobs and the results wobble: Prospeo's find rate isn't its strong suit, so on a big list it simply hands back fewer addresses. That costs you reach, not money, because a whiff is free and you're billed only on the ones it lands. Phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU coverage (verify), and there's no rollover, so anything unused each cycle is gone. Per-user pricing compounds on a team.

Ran a batch through the extension and watched it hold on enterprise domains, then thin out the moment I fed it 20-person shops. The 100 monthly free credits aren't a trap; they recur. But Prospeo verifies from the same pool it finds in, unspent credits die each cycle, and the bill sits per seat, so the headline price climbs the second a second rep logs in. Enrow's verification is a quarter-credit, its EU phone sourcing is documented, and Pro credits roll.

Best for: LinkedIn email at low volume

Pricing

Prospeo pricing. USD, per user, from $49/mo for 2,000 credits with a free 100-credit tier, billed only on a returned result, so a miss is free and the sticker is the honest per-email figure.

Starter's $49/2,000 is about $0.0245 per valid email, roughly 1.4x Enrow's $0.017 at Start, and it holds there because both bill on results, so Prospeo's weaker find rate costs reach, not cash. Phones eat 10 credits with no published EU coverage.

vs Enrow: about 1.4x Enrow's per-valid rate at entry, a fair comparison. Enrow's edge is everything wrapped around the address: 10+ checks, EU dials with paperwork, rollover from Pro up, no per-seat multiplication, and the one-click CRM record Prospeo doesn't attempt.

Snov bundles a verifier and a sender around a searchable database.

One subscription covers the lot with Snov.io: a searchable B2B database, an email finder, a multi-step verifier, drip campaigns, a light CRM, LinkedIn automation. It does everything AeroLeads manages on email, then bolts a database and a sender around it. The appeal is a single bill instead of three. What you trade for it is data freshness.

The catch is the source. Snov reveals rows from a warehouse, and warehoused contacts age off between refreshes, so its finder accuracy on a live list trails the specialists, the same weakness that makes AeroLeads' crawl data unreliable. A credit spends when you reveal a stored prospect, whether or not that row still delivers. You also pay for a lot of platform you may never open if verified emails are all you're after. No EU direct-dial story here.

Where it clicked for me: filter in the prospect search, push to the campaign builder, first email out, all in one place. Then the snag. A chunk of the found emails needed a second verification pass before I trusted them. Enrow runs the lookup when you ask and only bills on a valid result, and it covers the EU phones Snov skips. You give up the built-in sequencer. For the data itself, Enrow is the fresher source.

Best for: All-in-one finder + database + sender

Pricing

Snov.io pricing. USD, from $39/mo for 1,000 credits, but a credit burns the instant you reveal a stored row, live or dead.

At the ~30% find rate typical of per-search finders (verify), $0.039 a credit puts the real cost near $0.13 per found email, roughly 7.5x Enrow's $0.017 at Start and 15x its $0.0087 at Pro, before bounce and before unused monthly credits evaporate. Phones are a separate ~$0.02 token add-on with no EU story.

vs Enrow: priced per actually-found email at about $0.13, Snov runs roughly 7.5x Enrow's $0.017, grading warehouse rows where Enrow builds the contact the second you ask and bills per valid. Snov's pitch is breadth of platform against sharpness of data.

Built for cleaning French and EU rows, not chasing phones.

Dropcontact never licenses a list; it synthesises each address and tests it on the spot, then bolts on French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) with high email validity. Live, like Enrow, which is a genuine edge over AeroLeads' crawled data on European records. Its lane is sharp and narrow: cleaning and enriching French and EU rows inside HubSpot or Pipedrive, a hygiene job AeroLeads never really did.

Step outside that lane and the cons surface. Phones are weak, pulled only from email-signature extraction, so there's no genuine direct-dial product. No searchable database. Carry-over is a higher-tier perk. It's enrichment-first, not a bulk finder, and it doesn't send.

The SIREN and VAT columns on my French test rows came back clean, and no other tool here even reaches for that. It's also the edge of what Dropcontact does. Enrow works the same live way, then keeps going: it dials Europe with the legal file behind each number, covers the US, and drops the finished card into your CRM. Dropcontact enriches French records beautifully and stops there.

Best for: GDPR-first EU/French enrichment

Pricing

Dropcontact pricing. Converted to USD (EUR +20%), from about $35/mo for 500 credits, charged 1 credit per email found, so it bills on the result, not a saved record.

That entry works out to about $0.070 per valid email, roughly 4x Enrow's $0.017 and the priciest entry of any near-peer here, nudged higher still because the 500-credit tier carries nothing over. Phones never earn a $/phone line, because signature extraction isn't a direct-dial product.

vs Enrow: Dropcontact scrubs EU records well and stops there, at about 4x Enrow's per-valid rate at entry. Enrow wins on real-time finding, documented EU dials, per-valid billing, and the full-record CRM export from LinkedIn Dropcontact can't do.