easyleadz alternatives
9 Best EasyLeadz Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026
So we tested nine tools, EasyLeadz itself ranked last as the baseline. The yardsticks: match rate, bounce on a live send, real cost per valid contact, and geographic reach, EU phones above all. One list. Same week.
9 tools tested
updated July 2, 2026
14 min read
EasyLeadz is an Indian-mobile-number finder first: rupee pricing, best rates locked to Indian contacts, email riding along as a side feature. If your outbound runs on verified work emails plus direct dials in Europe or the US, the best EasyLeadz alternative for most teams is Enrow: the most accurate B2B email plus GDPR-cleared EU phones, billed only when the result is valid, from $17/month, with Pro at about $0.0087 per valid email and $0.35 per valid phone ($87 for 10,000 credits = 10,000 emails or 250 phones). Bounce sat under 1% on my live send (an observed average, not a guarantee). One capability here is Enrow's alone: open a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, click once, and its Chrome extension writes the complete verified record, every field, email and phone, into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive. Enrow ranks #1; the eight tools beneath it each hold one narrow niche, nothing more.
The alternatives at a glance
Enrow is the best overall EasyLeadz alternative for teams that want the most accurate verified emails and EU phones and want to pay only for valid results, from $17/month, with Pro at about $0.0087 per valid email and $0.35 per valid phone ($87 for 10,000 credits = 10,000 emails or 250 phones). EasyLeadz itself only fits one case, an India-focused team dialing Indian mobiles, which is a different job from Western outbound. For pure US cold-email addresses, Findymail; for domain-level email with citations, Hunter; for GDPR-clean EU/French enrichment, Dropcontact; for a programmatic, API-first stack, LeadMagic; for the all-in-one find-and-send, Apollo or Snov. Each covers a niche below; on data itself, none replaces Enrow.
Why teams look for EasyLeadz alternatives
EasyLeadz holds up fine for a team selling into India from the phone, yet people still leave, and it usually comes down to three things. If you sell into India and mostly dial mobiles, EasyLeadz can hold. If your outbound is US or EU email and real direct dials, keep reading.
Conflict of interest disclosure
The bias goes on the table first: I founded Enrow, Enrow sells contact data, and I've ranked it #1 in a list of contact-data tools. Weigh every line here against that. Now what Enrow won't do, stated just as flatly. It doesn't run outreach campaigns; for sequences I'd send you to Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist (Snov, ranked below, bundles a sequencer too). It doesn't warm up mailboxes or send cold email. It doesn't do waterfall enrichment, where LeadMagic fits, and it carries no browsable database like Apollo's. Every one of those absences is a scope decision: we find and verify each contact ourselves, live, instead of reselling anyone's stored rows.
The flag I will plant is on that single job: fresh, verified contact data, and nothing beyond it. On EasyLeadz's home turf, verified Indian mobiles at a low per-number rate, the product does what it says and I won't pretend otherwise. If you need campaigns, warm-up or an all-in-one suite, one of the tools below will fit you better. If what you need is the most accurate email and phone data, EU included, that narrow focus is the entire point of Enrow.
The 9 best EasyLeadz alternatives
1. Enrow
#1
Enrow started as my revenge on per-search invoices: hundreds billed for lookups, a thin file of usable contacts to show for it, bounces on top.
The split with EasyLeadz is clean, and it starts with what each tool is built to find. EasyLeadz is a mobile-number finder, sharpest on Indian contacts, with email bolted on. Enrow leads with the most accurate B2B email and treats direct dials, US and EU alike, as a first-class product rather than a side feature. Where EasyLeadz's email is a secondary line, Enrow runs 10+ verification checks on every address, multiple SMTP passes and catch-all checks across servers in different regions, before it counts. Valid result, or no charge. Both tools bill on a verified result, and I'll credit EasyLeadz for that. The difference is the depth of what gets verified, and the reach of where.
Then there's the gap EasyLeadz never closes for a Western team. Phones outside India. EasyLeadz's best rates are locked to Indian numbers and it says nothing about compliant European dials; pull an international number on the unlimited plan and the account pauses for a day. Enrow treats direct dials as a product on both sides of the Atlantic, and for the European numbers we keep the sourcing records that make them legal to dial. On my test list, that's what separated a direct line to a Munich sales director from a dead generic office number. Catch-all emails get verified and delivered, not flagged "risky" and quietly dropped, which is how plenty of tools keep their bounce numbers looking pretty.
And there's a workflow edge nothing else here touches. EasyLeadz's Mr. E extension is good at grabbing a single mobile off a LinkedIn profile. Enrow's Chrome extension finishes the whole job: one click on a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile and the finished contact card, title, company, email, direct dial, lands in HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive. No copy-paste. No half-filled record. Mr. E leaves you holding a phone number; Enrow leaves your CRM holding the contact.
One more thing, for the AI-agent crowd. Enrow ships an official MCP server (the repo is github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp), so you can call the email finder, verifier and direct-phone finder straight from Claude, Cursor or Windsurf. Fresh, verified emails and phones pulled into an agent workflow, still pay-per-valid. Small thing today. Handy if you're building.
Then the live send. Bounce sat under 1%, and the EU mobiles reached the actual people on the list. Discovery ran around 60% on that mixed batch. One caution, to be straight: that sub-1% is an observed average, not a guarantee.
- +Pay only for a valid result; a miss never costs a credit
- +EU and US direct-dial phones, GDPR documentation held for the EU ones (EasyLeadz's best rates are India-only)
- +10+ verification checks per email; catch-all verified and delivered, not dropped
- +Native CRM integrations: Clay, HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, plus webhooks, and a first-rate API
- +Chrome extension turns a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile into a complete verified CRM record, all fields, in a single click (alone on this list in doing that)
- +Credit rollover on Pro and Scale; no per-seat fees, and unlimited team members on Pro and Scale
- –No searchable database, on purpose. A stored list starts rotting the day it's compiled, titles change, people move on, so Enrow looks everything up live instead. That's a big part of why it's often more accurate. Build your lists in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
- –No outreach sequencing, and none is coming. For sending, look at Emelia first, then La Growth Machine, then lemlist.
- –No technographics. Company data stops at what LinkedIn knows; tech stacks aren't covered.
Three subscription tiers. Start: $17/mo for 1,000 credits or $47/mo for 4,000, monthly billing only. Pro: $87/mo for 10,000 credits, $167 for 20,000, $247 for 30,000. Scale: $397/mo for 50,000 credits, topping out at $1,397 for 200,000. Choose annual on Pro or Scale and the price drops about 10%, which puts 10,000 credits near $78/mo and 50,000 near $357/mo. The internal exchange rate: an email costs 1 credit, a phone 40, a verification 0.25, catch-all included, and nothing is deducted unless the result is valid. Work that through a 10,000-credit plan and you get 10,000 emails, or 250 phone numbers. Credits roll over on Pro and Scale. Free: 50 credits every month, recurring, no card.
Two penalties quietly inflate what most tools on this page really charge you. One: paying for the attempt, so the searches that come back empty still bill. Two: credits that expire at renewal, so you pay for more than you use. Enrow takes neither. A miss costs nothing, a bounce costs nothing, and credits roll over on Pro and Scale, which is why Enrow's sticker is its real cost. The cleaner comparison base is Pro: $87 for 10,000 credits, meaning 10,000 valid emails at about $0.0087 each or 250 valid phones at about $0.35 each. Start is the smaller $17 entry tier, $0.017 per valid email, $0.68 per valid phone. Hold those numbers. Every tool below either bills the search instead of the result, expires what you didn't burn, charges more per phone, or locks its best rate to one country, and that's where the gap opens up.
The cheapest way to check my math is with your own pipeline: take 50 contacts you actually care about and see what Enrow returns. The free tier renews at 50 credits every month, no card.
2. Hunter.io
The pick if you want an email off a website, fast, with a paper trail.
Hunter is the tool most people learn on. Feed it a domain, or a name and a company, and it hands back addresses, each with a confidence score and a note on where it spotted the pattern. Next to EasyLeadz, the difference is what each is built to find. EasyLeadz is a phone tool with email attached; Hunter is an email tool that does no phones at all. For a team that already dials elsewhere and just wants a clean domain-level finder with a free tier that renews, those citations are a real draw.
Two problems, and they compound. Hunter meters the search, not the result: run a lookup that finds nothing and the credit is gone all the same. Then, of the addresses that do come back, a share are pattern guesses at low confidence, so the credit is spent and the email still bounces. The data is crawled and pattern-matched, so smaller companies come back thin. Phones? None at all. So if EasyLeadz was your phone source, Hunter replaces the email half and nothing else.
Here's my read after a run. The source citations make it easy to trust an address at a glance, a real courtesy. But there are no phones, you're billed on attempts rather than results, the validation is looser so guessed addresses slip through and bounce, and you get no real-time freshness and nothing that files a finished contact record into your CRM from a profile page. Enrow runs 10+ checks before an address counts, bills only on a valid result, and adds the EU and US phones Hunter simply doesn't have.
- +Fast domain and email lookup with confidence scores and source citations
- +Free plan that renews (50 credits/month)
- +Mature integrations and a solid API
- +Simple, well-known workflow
- –Billed per attempted search, not per usable address: an empty lookup costs a credit
- –Crawled, pattern-guessed data thins out for smaller companies, and roughly one returned address in nine bounces
- –Credits reset monthly with no rollover
- –No phone numbers at all
Hunter pricing. EUR, charged 1:1 in USD. Free $0 (50 credits/month). Starter $49/mo for 2,000 credits, or $34/mo billed annually. Growth $149/mo for 10,000 credits, or $104/mo annual. Scale $299/mo for 25,000 credits, or $209/mo annual. Enterprise is custom.
Now the real cost, because that sticker is not it. Hunter bills the attempted search. Starter is $49 for 2,000 searches, so $0.0245 per attempt, spent whether or not an address comes back. In a public 20,000-contact benchmark, Hunter found 32.5% of the list, and 11.2% of what it returned bounced. (That benchmark was run by Dropcontact, another tool ranked on this page, which puts itself first in it. I'm citing it without a link and only where it cuts against the tool being measured.)
Work it through. $0.0245 ÷ 0.325 found = $0.0754 per address actually returned. Take out the 11.2% that bounces and you're at $0.085 per address you can send to. Then the credits: they reset every month and nobody drains an allotment to zero. Call it 15% left behind most months plus one dead month over the holidays, which is 77.9% utilization, so divide once more by 0.779. The landing figure is about $0.109 per deliverable valid email.
Say the double penalty plainly, because it's the whole argument. You pay for every attempt, and roughly two of every three attempts hand back nothing, so your bill is about 3x the sticker before one email leaves the outbox. Then part of what did come back is dead on arrival. You pay a lot, for not much, and some of the little you get bounces. That $0.109 is roughly 4.4x Hunter's own $0.0245 sticker, about 6.4x Enrow's $0.017 Start rate, and about 12.5x Enrow's $0.0087 at Pro. Growth's $149/10,000 ($0.0149 per attempt) runs the same gauntlet, and lands well above Enrow at matched volume. Hunter returns no phone numbers at all, so there's no $/phone to compute either, which is a hole if you dial.
vs Enrow: per deliverable email Hunter runs about 6.4x Enrow's Start rate and 12.5x Pro once the empty searches, the bounces and the expiring credits are all in the invoice. Enrow's $0.017 and $0.0087 need no such adjustment: a miss is free, a bounce is free, credits roll over on Pro and Scale. Add that Hunter has no phones, no real-time freshness, and nothing that carries a full verified record into the CRM in a click.
3. Prospeo
The headline entry point for LinkedIn-driven email.
Prospeo has a Chrome extension, a headline entry sticker, and verification in the same credit pool. It charges 1 credit per email found, nothing when it finds nothing, so it beats a phone-first tool on email cost transparency. Its niche is LinkedIn email at low-to-mid volume, with coverage, not cost, as the thing to watch. Where EasyLeadz sells you numbers by the month, Prospeo sells you email lookups at a headline sticker and lets you dabble in phones.
The asterisk is data quality and consistency. Push past small jobs and the results wobble, and its find rate is on the low side, so you finish a list with holes in it. Be precise about what that costs, though: an empty lookup at Prospeo is free, so the misses take contacts off your list, not money out of your account. Phones cost 10 credits each, no documented EU coverage (verify). What does take money is the reset. No rollover, so anything you don't burn each cycle is gone, and the credits you actually use end up costing more than the ones you bought.
On my own run the extension was quick, and the Free tier let me kick the tires without a card. Both points to Prospeo. But Enrow never charges for a non-match either, runs 10+ checks before an email counts, holds documented EU phone coverage, and rolls credits over on Pro and Scale, so nothing you paid for expires unused.
- +1 credit per email found, 0 on a miss
- +LinkedIn and domain finder with a solid Chrome extension
- +Verification in the same credit pool
- +Free plan (100 credits/month)
- –Uneven data quality once you push past small jobs
- –Phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU coverage
- –No credit rollover; per-user pricing
Prospeo pricing. USD, per user: Free $0 (100 credits/mo). Starter $49/mo (2,000 credits). Growth $99/mo (5,000). Pro $249/mo (15,000). Enterprise is custom. Annual grants all credits upfront (about $37/$74/$187 a month effective). A direct mobile number costs 10 credits.
Prospeo's sticker is $49/2,000 = about $0.0245 per email found, dropping to $0.0198 at $99/5,000, and because a miss costs nothing, that sticker is honest: the low find rate leaves holes in your list, not charges on your card. The cost that does hide is the monthly reset. No rollover means whatever you don't burn is gone; run the utilization discount this page applies to every expiring plan (15% left unused most months plus one idle month a year, so 77.9% of credits actually get spent) and the credits you do use work out near $0.031 per valid email on monthly billing, about 1.8x Enrow's $0.017 Start rate. Annual sidesteps that by granting all credits upfront. Phones are the other catch. A mobile eats 10 credits, so Starter's 2,000 credits nominally buy 200 numbers, but Prospeo publishes no EU coverage and its phone data quality is undocumented (verify), and a number you can't rely on in Europe isn't a number you can dial.
vs Enrow: even at sticker Prospeo's $0.0245 sits above Enrow's $0.017 on Start, and the expiring monthly credits push the used-credit rate near $0.031. The low find rate costs you reach rather than money, though a list full of holes is its own kind of bill. Enrow verifies harder with 10+ checks, delivers documented EU direct dials Prospeo doesn't, and rolls credits over on Pro and Scale. Prospeo's per-user pricing also stacks up fast on a team.
4. LeadMagic
The pick if your "tool" is actually a pipeline.
LeadMagic is API-shaped: 15+ enrichment endpoints (email, mobile, company, profile, job-change) drawing from a single shared credit pool, plus a CLI and an MCP server for AI-agent workflows. Credits deduct only on successful results. Where EasyLeadz gives a sales rep a button to press on a LinkedIn profile, LeadMagic gives a developer routes to call from code. Its niche is RevOps teams who'd rather write a script than click a UI.
Wiring it into a test workflow took me an afternoon, and the billing behaved: one pool, credits out only on hits, which is the right default. But it's an API, not a product you'd hand to a sales rep. Non-developers will stall. Mobiles cost 5 credits each, and EU/GDPR phone coverage isn't published, so EU reliability is a question mark (verify). Rollover only kicks in on Essential and above.
Enrow's API is every bit as scriptable, and its MCP server means the same agent workflows can pull verified data straight from Claude or Cursor. It also ships a real UI and a Chrome extension your reps can actually use, EU phones backed by sourcing records, and credits that roll over from Pro up. Programmable, without turning everyone into a developer.
- +Pay-per-valid, zero charge on failed matches
- +15+ endpoints from one shared credit pool
- +Developer tooling: API, CLI/TUI, MCP server
- +Mobile finder included in the same pool
- –No rollover on the entry Basic plan
- –Phones cost 5x an email; no published EU/GDPR phone detail
- –It's more an API than a browsable UI, so non-developers will struggle
LeadMagic pricing. USD: Basic $49/mo (2,000 credits; $490/yr). Essential $99/mo (5,000; rollover starts here). Growth $249/mo (20,000). Professional $499/mo (50,000). Ultimate $849/mo (100,000). Enterprise custom. Email Finder 1 credit, Mobile Finder 5, Email Validation 0.25. Credits deduct only on a successful result.
Pay-per-valid keeps the sticker honest on misses: a failed match costs nothing. Basic is $49/2,000 = about $0.0245 per valid email, roughly 1.4x Enrow's $0.017 on Start, and it stays above Enrow tier for tier ($99/5,000 = $0.0198, and even $849/100,000 = $0.0085 sits just above Enrow's $0.0079 Scale rate). Two haircuts still apply. In the same 20,000-contact benchmark cited under Hunter, 10.6% of what LeadMagic returned bounced, so a "valid" isn't always a deliverable: $0.0245 ÷ 0.894 = about $0.0274 per email that survives a send. And Basic doesn't roll over; at the 77.9% utilization this page applies to every expiring plan, the entry-tier credits you actually burn run nearer $0.035, with rollover only starting at Essential. Phones are 5 credits each, so 2,000 credits nominally buy 400 mobiles, but LeadMagic publishes no EU/GDPR phone coverage (verify), so a raw phone ratio on numbers of unknown European reliability is a different promise than documented EU direct dials.
vs Enrow: both are pay-per-valid and both have real APIs, and LeadMagic is the closest thing here to a per-valid near-peer, yet it still runs pricier than Enrow at every matched volume, more so at entry once the bounce share and the expiring Basic credits are counted. Enrow's phones are documented EU direct dials, and Enrow adds a rep-friendly UI plus the profile-to-CRM record push LeadMagic's endpoints can't do.
5. Apollo
For the everything-in-one-tab crowd.
Apollo pairs a huge B2B database with sequencing, enrichment and a Chrome extension, all on one seat-based subscription. Where EasyLeadz sells verified numbers one at a time, Apollo sells you a database to source from and a sequencer to send with. A lot of workflow in one tab, but the data is a component of that workflow, not its point, and that's exactly where a team chasing accurate contacts feels the trade.
The cost of that breadth is freshness, and how the credits work. Apollo is a stored database, and stored records quietly expire as people change jobs, so you'll hit contacts who moved on months ago. Credits are per seat. Mobile numbers eat into them. Export caps and data-accuracy gripes are the two things you'll read most in the reviews.
Fair play to Apollo on one thing: getting from a filter to a live sequence without leaving the tool is quick. Then I checked the data against a live send, and real-time won. Enrow finds and verifies each contact on the spot, delivers EU direct dials Apollo's database doesn't reliably cover, and bills only on valid, with no per-seat math. Want the all-in-one? Run Apollo for the suite, and let Enrow feed it the clean data layer.
- +Large B2B database with sequencing and enrichment in one place
- +Chrome extension and CRM integrations
- +Generous free tier (900 credits/year per seat)
- +One tool to source, enrich and send
- –Stored database, so data ages and accuracy is a common complaint
- –Credits are per seat and expire at renewal with no rollover; mobiles and exports draw down fast
- –Export caps and data-quality gripes are the recurring reviews
Apollo pricing. USD, per seat. Billed annually: Free $0 (75 unified credits/seat/month, i.e. 900/year). Basic $49/seat/mo (30,000 unified credits/seat/year). Professional $79/seat/mo (48,000/year). Organization $119/seat/mo (72,000/year, minimum 3 seats). Monthly billing runs higher: Basic $65, Professional $99, Organization card shows $149. Enterprise custom. Apollo now runs one unified credit pool: an email costs 1 credit, a mobile number 8.
Apollo's data all draws from that single pool, so email and phone compete for the same credits, and the pool expires: no rollover, so whatever a seat doesn't burn by renewal is gone. Priced monthly-to-monthly against Enrow's Start plan: Basic on monthly billing is $65/seat for 2,500 credits, $0.026 a credit on paper. Count the waste out loud, because you're paying for credits you won't use: at the 77.9% utilization this page applies to every expiring plan, that $0.026 becomes about $0.033 per valid email, roughly 2x Enrow's $0.017 Start rate and 3.8x Pro, for rows out of a stored database. A mobile eats 8 credits, so the raw math reads about $0.21 a phone (nearer $0.27 after the same waste), but every phone is 8 emails you didn't pull, the numbers lean US with no GDPR EU direct-dial product, and a share are stale on a live send, so don't let the raw $/phone flatter it. Per-seat multiplies all of it: a 5-rep team pays $325 a month before anyone dials.
vs Enrow: Apollo is the all-in-one; Enrow is the data layer. Apollo's raw phone math looks attractive, but mobiles burn 8x an email out of one shared, expiring pool, per seat at that; Enrow's real-time data beats a stored DB on a live send, its credits roll over on Pro and Scale so its sticker needs no waste adjustment, and it carries no per-seat fees. Different jobs, so run both if you want the suite and the clean data.
6. Snov.io
One subscription for the whole motion: search, find, verify, send.
Snov.io stacks a searchable B2B database on top of an email finder, a multi-step verifier, drip campaigns, a CRM and LinkedIn automation. Where EasyLeadz stops at finding numbers, Snov carries you from list all the way to first email. Its niche is the team that wants one subscription instead of three tools, and will trade data quality for that breadth. Because the data really is the thing that gives.
That trade is real. Snov's finder leans on its shelf of stored records, and shelf data decays, so accuracy on a live list lags the specialists. You also pay for a lot of product you may never touch if all you need is verified emails. No EU phone play here, either.
Where it clicked for me: the prospect search and campaign builder in one tool made it easy to go from filter to first email. Then the catch. A chunk of the found emails on my list needed a second verification pass. Database tax. Enrow finds each contact live, verifies it with 10+ checks, and adds the EU phones Snov skips. You give up the built-in sequencer, sure, but for the data itself it's the cleaner, fresher source. And if you do want sequences, I'd point you at Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist alongside it.
- +Searchable B2B database plus finder and verifier in one place
- +Drip campaigns, CRM and LinkedIn automation built in
- +Unlimited team seats on paid plans
- +Annual billing knocks 25% off
- –Database-sourced data goes stale, so accuracy on a live list trails pure finders
- –It's a lot of platform if you only need verified emails
- –No EU phone coverage; LinkedIn automation is a paid add-on
Snov.io pricing. USD: Trial free (50 credits). Starter $39/mo (1,000 credits). Pro S $99/mo (5,000). Pro M $189/mo (20,000). Pro L $369/mo (50,000). Ultra $738/mo (100,000). Annual billing takes 25% off. Phone and data enrichment is a separate token add-on (roughly $0.02 per token). LinkedIn automation runs about $69/mo per slot.
The sticker can look attractive at first, $39/1,000 = about $0.039 per attempted search. That word, attempted, is the whole story. Snov's own docs say the charge lands when you save a prospect, not when an address proves deliverable, so a lookup that surfaces nothing usable has still spent the credit. No public benchmark covers Snov's find rate, so I'm assuming around 30%, an assumption, flagged as one: $0.039 ÷ 0.30 = about $0.13 per address actually returned, before you subtract the stale rows that bounce and before any credits left unspent at the monthly reset. Spell the double penalty out. You pay for every attempt while roughly two in three hand back nothing, so the bill runs near 3x the sticker before a single email leaves the outbox, and part of what does come back is a shelf row that has gone dead. Multiples of Enrow's $0.017, whichever way you slice it. Phones aren't in the plan at all; they're a separate token add-on (roughly $0.02 per token, ~90-day validity) with no EU direct-dial story, so there's no dependable $/phone to quote.
vs Enrow: on real cost per valid email Enrow's $0.017 sits far under Snov's ~$0.13 per returned address (at an assumed ~30% find rate, before bounces), and Enrow finds each contact fresh in real time (no stale DB), bills only on a valid result, and adds EU phones Snov doesn't sell. Snov bundles a sender and a database Enrow doesn't; that's the trade.
7. EasyLeadz
The tool this article is measured against.
EasyLeadz is the baseline, so here it is on its own terms. It's a mobile-number finder, delivered mostly through the Mr. E Chrome extension: open a LinkedIn profile, hit the button, get a verified direct dial. Its home turf is India, and on Indian mobiles the coverage runs deep, with a fair refund policy behind it: numbers that come back wrong get credited, capped at about 10% of purchased credits on annual plans. Watch what the refund covers, though. Wrong numbers, not empty searches. The meter runs on the lookup, so an attempt that returns nothing still spends from the monthly allotment. On Indian mobiles the hit rate runs high enough that this rarely stings, and for a team selling into India it's still a clean deal, I'll say so.
Outside that lane, the picture flips. The pricing is in rupees, and the standout "unlimited" rate of roughly ₹2 a number is locked to Indian contacts; pull an international number on those plans and the account pauses for 24 hours. There's no European direct-dial coverage with the compliance to back it, the exact number a Europe-focused team needs. And while EasyLeadz does surface work and personal emails, email is the secondary product, so verification depth and match rate on email trail the tools built to do only that.
For an Indian sales team living in the phone, Mr. E plus the refund policy is a coherent package for that one market. But if your outbound is US or EU work email plus direct dials you're allowed to call, a rupee-priced, India-first phone tool isn't the fit. Enrow finds and verifies the most accurate email in real time, returns US and EU direct dials with the compliance file held for the European ones, charges only on a valid result, and its extension turns the same LinkedIn profile Mr. E reads into a finished CRM record rather than a lone phone number.
- +Strong, verified Indian mobile-number coverage
- +Fair refund policy: numbers that turn out wrong are credited back (capped ~10% on annual)
- +Fast Mr. E Chrome extension for LinkedIn direct dials
- +Low effective per-number rate on the unlimited India plans
- –India-first; best rates locked to Indian contacts, international lookups pause the account
- –Metered per lookup, no monthly rollover: empty searches spend credits, and refunds only cover wrong numbers
- –No EU direct-dial product with the sourcing paperwork behind it
- –Email is a secondary feature, so email match rate and verification trail the specialists
EasyLeadz pricing. Priced in INR, plus 18% GST; I've converted at roughly ₹1 = $0.012 for the ranges below (live rate around $0.0105, so treat these as slightly high). Free ₹0 (5 mobile numbers, 1 user). Startup ₹2,419/mo (~$29) for 40 lookups, up to 2 users. Scaleup ₹5,999/mo (~$72) for 130 lookups. Growth ₹11,999/mo (~$144) for 300. Hyper Growth ₹19,249/mo (~$231) for 500. Super Nova ₹36,299/mo (~$436) for 1,000. The site sells these tiers as "numbers," but the meter deducts on the lookup. Annual plans add ~25% more lookups. Separate "Fully Unlimited" and "Unlimited" annual plans run daily caps (₹4,167/mo for 20/day, ₹6,667/mo for 50/day, up to 170/day on the top Unlimited tier) and are India-only, with an effective rate the site's own page quotes at about ₹2 per verified Indian number (~$0.021 at the live rate).
Now the real cost, and the refund policy only covers half of it. Wrong numbers get credited back, which is fair. Empty lookups don't: the meter charges the attempt, so a search that returns nothing has still spent from the allotment, and the allotment itself resets monthly with no rollover.
On the monthly tiers, ₹2,419 for 40 lookups is roughly ₹60 a lookup before GST, about $0.86 per attempt at my conversion (nearer $0.75 at the live rate, dropping toward $0.51 on Super Nova volume). On its Indian home turf the hit rate runs high, so the per-attempt and per-number price stay close, and even that near-sticker rate sits above Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark per valid phone. Point it at a US or European list and EasyLeadz publishes no coverage figure, so I'll assume around a 30% hit rate, an assumption, flagged as one. That's $0.86 ÷ 0.30 = about $2.87 per number actually found, and after the 77.9% utilization discount this page applies to every no-rollover plan, about $3.70 per found number on a mixed Western list. The double penalty, plainly: you pay for every attempt while roughly two in three come back empty outside its home market, so the bill runs near 3x the sticker before you dial once, and the refund can't help because it credits wrong numbers, not empty searches. The headline ~₹2 rate (about $0.021 at the live rate) the site quotes on its fair-use unlimited plans only exists there, and only for Indian contacts. There's no email $/valid quoted here because email isn't the metered product.
vs Enrow: on Indian mobiles specifically, EasyLeadz's high home-turf hit rate and refund policy keep its real rate near its sticker, and I won't pretend that rate is bad for that market. But even there the monthly tiers run above Enrow's per-phone cost, and outside India the per-lookup meter, the assumed ~30% hit rate and the expiring credits push the real figure toward $3.70 per found number, roughly 5x Enrow's $0.68 Start phone rate and over 10x the $0.35 Pro rate. Enrow's phone rates need no such adjustment, a miss is free and credits roll over on Pro and Scale, they come with documented EU and US coverage, its emails are the primary, 10+-check-verified product at about $0.017 each, and its extension writes the whole verified contact into your CRM in a click, none of which EasyLeadz matches.
8. Findymail
The clean pick if all you want is US cold-email addresses and billing that only counts hits.
Findymail is a B2B email finder built for outreach, and it takes the email job EasyLeadz treats as a sideline and makes it the whole product. It bills on the found result, not the search, so a miss costs you nothing. Point it at a LinkedIn list or a domain, get back verified business emails. On pure US email accuracy it's one of the stronger finders in the category, and I'll say that plainly.
Geography is where it stops. No EU phone numbers, because GDPR closes that off for them, so for a Europe-focused team it's effectively email-only. Where EasyLeadz gives you Indian mobiles, Findymail gives you almost no phones at all. And the subscription caps credit rollover at 2x your monthly allowance, so buy ahead for a big quarter and the surplus dies at renewal.
In practice, two things held up: the pay-per-found meter did what it promises, and the US email quality was there. But Enrow matches that billing and then adds what Findymail can't. GDPR-cleared EU phones. Catch-alls delivered, not dropped. Whole verified records pushed from LinkedIn into the CRM. Same meter, wider reach.
- +Bills on the found result, not per search
- +Strong, accurate US B2B email finding
- +SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant, EU-hosted
- +Native HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Instantly and lemlist integrations
- –No EU phone data (GDPR); phones generally thin
- –Credit rollover caps at 2x your monthly allowance
- –Subscription-only, no meaningful free plan
Findymail pricing. USD. The finder plan runs on a slider that opens at $49/mo for 1,000 credits, stepping up to $99/mo for 5,000 and $249/mo for 15,000, with a custom Enterprise tier above it. Annual billing works out to two months free, about $41/mo at the entry tier. A trial gives 10 credits, no card. Unused credits roll over up to 2x the monthly allowance.
Since Findymail bills only on a found result, the sticker sits close to the real cost: the finder floor is $49 for 1,000 credits, which works out to about $0.049 per valid email, roughly three times Enrow's $0.017 Start rate at the same 1,000-email volume. Phones run 10 credits each (verify), which would put 100 phones in a 1,000-credit pool at roughly $0.49 on a raw-credit basis, but Findymail returns no EU mobiles at all (GDPR closes that off), so for a Europe list that per-phone number is academic.
vs Enrow: per valid email Findymail runs distinctly pricier at matched volume, about $0.049 to Enrow's $0.017 on Start (near 3x) and about 5.6x Enrow's $0.0087 at Pro volume, even though both bill on results. The gap only closes near 100,000/mo, where Findymail's $849 lands around $0.0085 (about 1.1x Enrow at that tier) — it never dips below. Findymail stays a genuine peer on US-email accuracy, but it is not the cheaper option. And everything phone-shaped separates them further: Enrow returns GDPR-cleared EU numbers Findymail can't, keeps catch-alls in the deliverable pile, and moves a LinkedIn profile into the CRM as one finished contact. Enrow opens far cheaper too, $17 for its 1,000-email Start against Findymail's $49 for 1,000 credits, and its per-valid cost stays lower at every tier below 100k.
9. Dropcontact
The European compliance hawk's choice.
Dropcontact doesn't resell warehouse rows; it computes and tests each email algorithmically at the moment you ask, with French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) and high email validity. Like Enrow, it works live rather than off a crawled database, and that's a real edge for European records. Its niche is narrow and clear: cleaning and enriching French and EU records inside HubSpot or Pipedrive, the data-hygiene job EasyLeadz doesn't touch at all.
Step outside that niche and the cons show. Phones are weak, pulled only from email-signature extraction, so there's no real direct-dial product, which is telling next to a phone specialist like EasyLeadz. No searchable database. Carry-over is a Growth-tier perk. It's enrichment-first, not a finder, and it doesn't send.
I've watched Dropcontact tidy a scruffy French CRM export better than anything else on this page, and those SIREN and VAT fields are the reason. That's also the boundary of what it does well. Enrow finds and verifies live the same way, but it actually delivers EU direct dials it can lawfully source, covers the US too, runs 10+ checks, bills only on a valid result, and parks the whole verified contact in your CRM in a click. For enrichment plus reach, not just cleaning, Enrow is the wider tool.
- +GDPR-compliant, EU-server real-time enrichment (not a crawled DB)
- +High email validity, strong on catch-all
- +French-specific data (SIREN, VAT)
- +CRM-native enrichment across HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho
- –Weak phone capability (signature-extraction only)
- –No searchable database for list-building
- –Carry-over only on Growth tier
Dropcontact pricing. Converted to USD (EUR +20%). The credit ladder opens at €29/mo, about $35, for 500 credits, scaling up from there (€59/1,500, €89/4,000, €189/11,000, up to €1,349/100,000); carry-over doesn't apply at that 500-credit entry tier. Annual is roughly 20% cheaper. Dropcontact runs a pay-on-success model, so a credit is consumed per email found. Note: EU firmographics (SIREN, VAT) are its strength; there's no US focus here.
On the real cost, pay-on-success means the sticker tells the truth: $35 buys 500 found emails, about $0.070 per valid email, roughly four times Enrow's $0.017 per valid email, and Dropcontact is an enrichment engine, not a bulk finder, so you feel that entry price hard at low volume. One extra line on that entry tier: its 500 credits don't carry over, so at the 77.9% utilization this page applies to every expiring plan, the credits you actually use land nearer $0.090. It narrows at scale (€1,349/100,000 works out near $0.016, still about 2x Enrow at the same volume), but it never undercuts Enrow. Phones don't get a real $/phone here at all, because they come only from email-signature extraction rather than a direct-dial product.
vs Enrow: Dropcontact cleans EU records well but barely does phones, and at its entry its cost per valid email runs about 4x Enrow's, still about 2x even at 100,000/mo. Enrow adds real EU direct dials, US coverage, and one-click CRM export, still pay-per-valid.
The cheapest way to check my math is with your own pipeline: take 50 contacts you actually care about and see what Enrow returns. The free tier renews at 50 credits every month, no card.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Final verdict
Put all nine on the same list and the ranking holds: for verified emails plus phones you can dial in Paris as easily as Pittsburgh, billed only when the result is real, Enrow wins. EasyLeadz is an India-first mobile-number finder with a fair refund policy and a slick extension, and on Indian dials it does its one job. But its best rates are locked to Indian contacts, its pricing is in rupees, and email is a sideline rather than the point. Enrow leads with the most accurate work email, returns US and EU direct dials with the sourcing records held for the European ones, and bills only on a valid result. Then the part no tool on this list can match: open a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, click once, and the verified contact in full, role, company, email and direct dial, is sitting in HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive. Mr. E hands you a number; Enrow files the whole record. Now the caveats, plainly. Enrow is not an all-in-one: no searchable database, no sequencing, no sender, no technographics. Sell mostly into India and mostly dial mobiles? That's EasyLeadz's home lane, and a different job from the one this page is about. For the most accurate email and phone data, EU included, flowing into whatever you send with, Enrow's narrow focus is the whole job.
The cheapest way to check my math is with your own pipeline: take 50 contacts you actually care about and see what Enrow returns. The free tier renews at 50 credits every month, no card.
Everything you need to know
What is the best free alternative to EasyLeadz?
Why do people look for an EasyLeadz alternative?
Does EasyLeadz find email addresses or just phone numbers?
How does EasyLeadz pricing compare to Enrow?
Does EasyLeadz cover phone numbers outside India?
Can I export EasyLeadz contacts into my CRM?
How we evaluated these tools
Nobody paid to be here: no affiliate links, no sponsored slots. The scoring came out of one exercise, a single prospect list pushed through all nine tools inside the same week, then graded on four criteria. Match rate, meaning how many real, usable contacts actually came back. Bounce, measured on a live send rather than a validator's promise. Real cost per valid contact, after stripping out credits burned on duds. And geographic coverage, with lawfully sourced EU phones weighted hardest. Competitor pricing and features come from each tool's official pages, checked on 2026-07-02; anything I couldn't confirm live is marked "verify."
bereit, keine zeit mehr zu verschwenden?
Verbunden in Minuten.
Verifizierte Daten in Sekunden.
keine Kreditkarte
kein Setup nötig