sellhack alternatives
11 Best SellHack Alternatives for B2B Sales Teams in 2026
We evaluated 11 alternatives on the four things that actually decide an outbound budget: match rate, bounce on a live send, real cost per valid contact, and EU phone coverage. Same list, same week, every tool. For context, SellHack sits around 4/5 on G2 across a modest review count (verify) — respectable for a lightweight finder that's been around since the early prospecting days.
11 tools tested
updated July 6, 2026
16 min read
SellHack is a clean little email finder: tiny plans, a daily list builder, a low $0.049 sticker. But it stops at emails, caps out at 5,000 credits a month, and — like every per-search finder — spends a credit on the lookup, not on the valid result, so the real cost per usable email runs several times that sticker.
The switch is Enrow: verified emails plus GDPR-cleared EU direct dials, found in real time, billed only when the result is valid, from $17/month, with Pro at ~$0.0087 per valid email. Its Chrome extension drops the full verified contact from LinkedIn straight into your CRM in one click. And the free tier restocks every month: 50 credits, no card.
The alternatives at a glance
if you want verified emails and EU phones you only pay for when they're valid, Enrow is the move: $17/month in, with Pro at about $0.0087 per valid email — a fraction of what SellHack really costs per usable address once its per-lookup billing is priced in — and phones SellHack simply doesn't have. The other ten each own a narrow lane. Emelia if you must send from the same login, Apollo if you want one dashboard for everything, Dropcontact if compliance signs your invoices. Sort by niche below; none of them is the better overall buy.
Why teams look for SellHack alternatives
SellHack does one job well and then runs out of room, which is why people leave for the same three reasons. Good starter tool. It just wasn't built to scale a sales team.
Conflict of interest disclosure
Let's be straight: Enrow is mine, and I've put it at #1 on a list I wrote. Now you know my bias exactly as well as I do.
What I won't do is dress up the ranking to hide a trade-off. Several tools below do more than Enrow: they send sequences, run warm-up, carry giant browsable databases. We build none of that, deliberately. One product, one obsession — the most accurate emails and direct dials you can buy, verified before you're ever charged. Narrow scope is the fee we pay for that accuracy, and I'd pay it again tomorrow.
Want the whole suite in one login? A tool below will suit you, and I'll say which. Want the data to be right? That's the entire point of Enrow.
The 11 best SellHack alternatives
1. Enrow
#1
Full disclosure, said twice: this one is mine. I built it because I was tired of paying to enrich files, finding a fraction, and still eating bounces.
Where SellHack and Enrow part ways is the meter. SellHack spends a credit on every lookup you run, hit or miss; Enrow bills a credit only when the address comes back verified and deliverable, and never on a miss or a bounce. That's the difference between paying for attempts and paying for results.
Phones are the whole difference. Enrow's Direct Phone Finder returns dials in the US and across Europe, where we hold the legal documentation to source EU mobiles. SellHack returns none, anywhere. If your team calls, that's not a small gap — it's the other half of the job.
And the trick nobody else on this page does. Open a LinkedIn or Sales Navigator profile, click once, and the Chrome extension writes the complete verified record — email, direct dial, every field — into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive. No copy-paste, no half-empty CRM card. There's an official MCP server too (repo github.com/EnrowAPI/enrow-mcp), so Claude or Cursor can call the finder and verifier directly; details on the API page.
Then the products stop being the same size. SellHack finds emails and stops. Enrow finds emails, verifies them with 10+ checks per address — multiple SMTP passes plus catch-all probes from servers in different regions — and then also finds phones. Catch-alls come back verified and usable instead of flagged "risky" and dropped. On my mixed test list, discovery ran around 60-70% and the live send bounced under 1%. Observed on that list, not a contract.
- +Billed only on valid results; misses and bounces cost nothing
- +US and EU direct dials, with the GDPR paperwork held for the European ones
- +10+ verification checks per email; catch-alls verified and delivered
- +One click moves the full verified contact from LinkedIn into HubSpot, Salesforce or Pipedrive
- +Native Clay, HubSpot, Salesforce and Pipedrive integrations, plus a documented API and MCP server
- +No per-seat fees; Pro and Scale credits roll over
- –No database to browse. Stored databases age, and you end up pitching people who already left; real-time lookup is the fix we chose, so list sourcing stays in LinkedIn or Sales Navigator.
- –It won't send your campaigns. Sequencing is a product we refuse to build — Emelia, La Growth Machine or lemlist handle that.
- –Company data stops at LinkedIn depth. No technographics.
Three tiers, priced monthly. Start: 1,000 credits for $17 or 4,000 for $47 (monthly only). Pro: 10,000 for $87, 20,000 for $167, 30,000 for $247. Scale: 50,000 for $397, 80,000 for $597, 140,000 for $997, 200,000 for $1,397. Going annual trims Pro and Scale by about 10%, which puts 10,000 near $78/mo and 50,000 near $357/mo.
One credit buys one email; a phone runs 40 credits; a verification is 0.25, catch-all included. Nothing is charged unless the result is valid, so the cleaner comparison base is Pro: $87 buys 10,000 valid emails or 250 valid phones, about $0.0087 per email or $0.35 per phone. Start remains the $17 entry tier. Pro and Scale credits roll over.
Here's where it lands against SellHack. SellHack's Rainmaker ceiling is 5,000 credits for $199, email-only — and because those credits are spent per lookup, not per valid email, a realistic ~30% find rate leaves you nearer 1,500 usable addresses. On Enrow, 4,000 valid credits cost $47 and 10,000 cost $87, with room to spare and phones in the same pool. More deliverable contacts for a fraction of the price, and Enrow keeps scaling to 200,000 while SellHack stops at 5,000.
The free tier refills on its own: 50 credits every month, no card, indefinitely. Since credits only burn on valid results, none of the 50 die on a guess.
Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.
2. Emelia
Emelia is a different job. It sends.
It's a sequencer with a finder bolted on: cold email, LinkedIn steps, warm-up, one login. SellHack never sent a campaign in its life, and neither do we — which is exactly why Emelia is where we point people who ask us for sequencing.
As a data source it's respectable rather than the reason you'd buy it. Finder credits burn on results found, phone coverage is thin, and heavier data use lands on add-on credit packs. The setup I actually recommend: Enrow finds and verifies, Emelia sends.
- +Find, verify and send (cold email + LinkedIn + warm-up) in one place
- +Finder credits charge on results found
- +Sales Navigator scraping and waterfall enrichment included
- +Unlimited sending and contacts on paid plans
- –Thin phone coverage; not a dialing tool
- –Heavy data use pushes into add-on credit packs
- –Outreach-first, so data depth trails the pure finders
Converted from EUR (+20%): Start about $44/month (3 mailboxes, 1 LinkedIn seat, 500 credits), Grow about $116, Scale about $356. A credits add-on runs about $23/month for 1,000 credits. Finder credits burn on found results; phone credits cost 50 apiece from the pool.
Because credits spend on found results, the sticker tracks real cost, but the finder lives partly in add-on packs, so your true $/valid email depends on the pack you buy (verify). Phones are too thin to price honestly.
vs Enrow: no contest on data, and Emelia wouldn't argue it. Feed it Enrow's verified contacts at $0.017 apiece and both tools do their best work — one finds, one sends.
Anymailfinder is what SellHack's bounce-protection marketing implies but doesn't deliver: a genuine pay-per-valid meter, charged only when the address passes verification, not on the lookup.
Verified emails, charged only when the address passes verification. No phones, no database, no CRM push. One credit buys one found email, checking an outside address is cheaper, and unused credits roll over with no cap while you stay subscribed — more generous than SellHack's flat monthly pool. The scope fits in a sentence, and on a messy list the unverifiable rows cost me nothing.
- +Charged only for emails confirmed valid
- +Strong catch-all handling
- +Credits roll over uncapped while subscribed
- +Simple single, bulk or API access
- –Email-only, no phones at all
- –Entry sits at $0.049 per valid email, roughly 3× Enrow's rate
- –No CRM push or contact export to speak of
Priced in USD: Standard from $29/month (400 credits) through $49 (1,000) and $89 (2,000); Scale $149 (5,000) and $199 (10,000); Ultimate $299 (25,000) up to $799 (100,000). Annual runs roughly a third cheaper. One credit buys one found email.
Per-found billing keeps the sticker honest: because Anymailfinder only charges when it returns an address, the $49 tier's about $0.049 per valid email is the real cost — unlike SellHack's identical-looking sticker, which is spent per lookup. It's roughly 3× Enrow's $0.017 at that 1,000-email volume, easing toward $0.020 at 10,000 and only nearing Enrow up at 100,000. Where it beats SellHack is headroom — it climbs to 100,000 credits, where SellHack quits at 5,000.
vs Enrow: a genuine pay-per-found meter, same email-only scope as SellHack, and about triple Enrow's Pro rate per valid email. Match the volume and Enrow undercuts it, then adds the phones and one-click CRM export neither of them was built to do.
4. LeadMagic
LeadMagic is for people whose "tool" is a pipeline.
It's API-shaped: 15+ enrichment endpoints (email, mobile, company, profile, job changes) drawing on one shared credit pool, with an MCP server for agent workflows. Credits deduct only on success — a genuine pay-per-valid meter, applied across far more than email. That alone puts it a category ahead of a single-purpose finder.
It's also not something you hand a rep. There's no real UI to live in, EU phone coverage is unpublished (verify), and rollover only starts one tier up. The docs read better than most tools' dashboards, which tells you exactly who it's for.
- +Pay-per-valid: failed matches cost nothing
- +15+ endpoints on one shared credit pool
- +Developer tooling: API, CLI, MCP server
- +Mobile finder included in the same pool
- –No rollover on the entry Basic plan
- –Mobiles cost 5× an email, with no published EU/GDPR phone detail (verify)
- –API-first, so non-developers will stall
LeadMagic: Basic $49/month (2,000 credits), Essential $99 (5,000; rollover starts here, up to 2 months), Growth $249 (20,000), Professional $499 (50,000), Ultimate $849 (100,000). Emails cost 1 credit, mobiles 5, validation 0.25, deducted only on success.
Basic prices a valid email at about $0.0245 — a real per-found rate, since LeadMagic bills only on a hit. One honest caveat: the public 20,000-contact benchmark shows LeadMagic handing back addresses that bounce about 10.6% of the time, so the cost per deliverable email is nearer $0.0274 ($0.0245 ÷ 0.894). A mobile runs near $0.12. That phone ratio is not comparable to the Enrow valid-phone metric because it ships with no published EU coverage or quality documentation (verify), which is a different promise than a documented EU direct dial. Headline prices on unknowns are still unknowns.
vs Enrow: two honest meters, two audiences. Enrow matches the API story, then adds the rep-facing product SellHack and LeadMagic both lack: a UI, the extension, one-click CRM export, and EU phones with paperwork behind them.
5. Apollo
Apollo is the usual answer when someone wants the whole motion in one tab: database, sequences, enrichment, a dialer, one subscription.
Against SellHack that's a category jump, not a swap. You're trading a lightweight finder for a workflow with data inside it, and for a small team that wants outbound end to end without stitching tools together, the pitch lands.
The bill for the breadth is the data. Apollo is a stored database, so records age, and its reviews circle two complaints on repeat: accuracy and export caps. Mobiles cost 8 credits each from the shared pool. Getting from a filter to a live sequence in one sitting genuinely impressed me; checking those contacts against a live send is where real-time won.
- +Large B2B database with sequencing and enrichment in one place
- +Chrome extension and CRM integrations
- +Workable free tier (75 credits/seat/month)
- +One tool to source, enrich and send
- –Stored database, so records go stale and accuracy gripes recur in reviews
- –Credits are per seat and don't roll over; mobiles cost 8 credits and exports draw down fast
- –Export caps bite before the lookups do
Apollo, per seat: Free $0 (75 credits/mo), Basic $65/seat/mo monthly ($49 billed annually) with 2,500 credits/seat/month, Professional $99 ($79 annual) with 4,000, Organization $119/seat annual (3-seat minimum) with 6,000. One credit reveals a verified email; a mobile costs 8.
Email is charged per verified reveal, so Basic's 2,500 credits look like $0.026 per email — but those credits don't roll over. Whatever a rep leaves unused at month-end is gone, and on a realistic ~78% utilization the effective rate climbs to about $0.033 per valid email (~2× Enrow Start, 3.8× Pro). And it's per seat: a five-rep team pays $325/month for five separate pools, each leaking its own unused credits. Phones bite hardest: at 8 credits each, a Basic seat's pool buys roughly 312 mobiles for $65, about $0.21 per reveal from a stored, US-leaning row with no GDPR EU direct-dial product behind it, before you count the stale ones. Enrow's $0.35 Pro benchmark phone is verified live at the moment you ask.
vs Enrow: buy Apollo for the cockpit if you want one, then let Enrow supply the layer it can't keep fresh. On emails it's a stored database that ages against real-time verification; on phones it's a reveal from a row against a dial verified the second you request it.
6. Snov
Snov sells the bundle: finder, verifier, drip campaigns, a light CRM, one modest bill.
Fair pitch for a solo user with loose data standards, and more product than SellHack for a similar entry price. But the credits spend on saving stored prospects, and a credit is taken even for a yellow, unverifiable address — not just the clean green ones. So a slice of what you pay for was shaky before you sent to it. A visible share of my Snov finds needed a second verification pass.
- +Finder, verifier, drip campaigns and CRM in one subscription
- +Searchable prospect database included
- +Unlimited team seats on paid plans
- +Annual billing cuts 25%
- –Credits spend on saving stored rows, including unverifiable ones
- –No EU phone play; phones are a separate token add-on
- –A lot of platform if verified emails are all you need
Snov: Starter $39/month (1,000 credits), Pro S $99 (5,000), Pro M $189 (20,000), Pro L $369 (50,000), Ultra $738 (100,000). Annual takes 25% off. Phones live in a separate token wallet around $0.02 a token, charged only on a found number; LinkedIn automation is about $69 per slot.
Here's the catch the sticker hides: Snov bills per search, not per valid result. The $0.039 you spend buys an attempt, and a credit is gone whether the row comes back clean, yellow, or empty. Snov publishes no match rate, so assume the ~30% a per-search finder typically returns: that alone lifts the real cost to about $0.13 per found email, and since the credits reset monthly with no rollover, closer to $0.17 per deliverable valid — roughly 8–10× Enrow's $0.017 and multiples of Pro. You pay for a lot of lookups, most come back with nothing, and part of what does come back needed a second verification pass.
vs Enrow: Snov is the headline wrapper; the data inside is the weak part. Enrow is only the data, fresh and billed strictly on valid, and it pairs with any sender — Snov's included.
7. Prospeo
Prospeo's price is its whole pitch. Look past it.
On my list it found about 20% of the contacts. Enrow found 60-70%. No entry price survives that gap: when four in five targets come back empty, you finish the job somewhere else and pay twice. On my list SellHack, for all its limits, at least returned a bigger share than one in five.
The rest is what you'd expect at the price point. Quality gets uneven past small jobs, phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU coverage (verify), free-plan credits don't roll over, and pricing is per user.
- +1 credit per found email, 0 on a miss
- +Quick Chrome extension for LinkedIn and domains
- +Verification included in the same credit pool
- +Free plan (100 credits/month)
- –Found about 20% of my test list; most contacts simply don't come back
- –Phones cost 10 credits with no documented EU story (verify)
- –No rollover on free credits, and per-user pricing stacks on teams
Prospeo: Starter $49/month for 2,000 credits, Growth $99 (5,000), Pro $249 (15,000). Mobiles cost 10 credits.
The sticker reads about $0.0245 per valid email on Starter, already 1.6× Enrow's $0.017 at matched volume — and because Prospeo bills only on a valid result, that stays its real cost per email: a miss is free, so its low find rate costs you reach, not money. That's the real catch. On my list Prospeo returned about a fifth of the contacts, so to finish a list you go buy a second tool and pay for coverage twice — while the $0.0245 you do spend still sits above Enrow. Phones work out near $0.49 on paper with nothing documented behind them (verify).
vs Enrow: the sticker already runs above Enrow, and the find rates live on different planets. Enrow's $0.017 with 60-70% discovery buys a finished list, not a fifth of one.
8. Hunter
Hunter is the email finder most people meet first, and it's genuinely good at the on-ramp.
Feed it a domain or a name plus a company and it returns addresses scored for confidence. But Hunter bills you for the search itself, not for a valid result: a credit is gone whether the lookup returns a solid find, a low-confidence pattern guess, or nothing at all. Only about a third of attempts come back with anything, and roughly 11% of what does come back bounces on a live send — the public 20,000-contact benchmark puts Hunter at 32.5% found and 11.2% bounce. So you pay for a pile of attempts, most return nothing, and part of the little you get is dead. Enrow's meter inverts both: a miss costs nothing, a bounce costs nothing. We break the whole thing down in our Hunter breakdown.
Then the data. Hunter crawls the web and guesses formats, which works on big companies and thins out on smaller ones — exactly where most ICPs live. And like SellHack, there are no phone numbers anywhere in the product.
- +Real, generous free plan (50 credits/month)
- +Clean domain search and browser extension
- +Plugs into most CRMs and senders
- +About 4.4/5 on G2 across 600+ reviews
- –Bills per search attempt, not per valid — most attempts return nothing
- –No phone numbers on any plan
- –Crawled, pattern-guessed data thins out on smaller firms
Hunter (EUR charged 1:1 in USD): Free 50 credits/month, Starter $49/month for 2,000 credits ($34/mo annual), Growth $149 (10,000), Scale $299 (25,000). One credit per search attempt — hit or miss, not per valid — with verification at 0.5.
The $49 tier looks like $0.0245 per attempted search, but that credit buys the lookup, not a valid address. Only ~32.5% of attempts return anything, so the real cost per found email is already near $0.075; haircut the 11.2% that bounces and the monthly credits that expire unused, and a deliverable valid email works out around $0.109 — roughly 6.4× Enrow at the same volume, ~12.5× Pro, and about 3.5-4.5× Hunter's own sticker. Enrow charges only for a verified, deliverable address, so a miss and a bounce both cost nothing.
vs Enrow: Hunter charges for every search attempt, hit or miss; Enrow charges only for verified, deliverable addresses, opens at $17 against $49, and returns EU direct dials Hunter has never carried.
9. RocketReach
RocketReach is sheer breadth: hundreds of millions of stored profiles, emails and phones one lookup away.
That's its appeal against SellHack. An actual browsable database, with phone numbers, where SellHack offers a finder and no directory at all. Type a name, reveal a contact, export the rows. Recruiters love it, and a G2 rating around 4.4/5 from well over a thousand reviews backs the ease of use. The full teardown sits in our RocketReach alternatives page.
The problem is what a stored row does after it's stored. Reviewers self-report mobile accuracy around 60-70% and email bounce in the 20-30% range (their figures, not a controlled test; verify), and a lookup burns whether the reveal is live or dead. Coverage skews hard US. The breadth kept impressing me right up until the third dead number in ten stopped feeling like coincidence.
- +Very broad B2B database with strong US coverage
- +One lookup reveals an email or a phone
- +Clean search box, browser extension, CRM hooks on higher tiers
- +About 4.4/5 on G2 across 1,000+ reviews
- –Stored reveals: self-reported ~60-70% mobile accuracy and ~20-30% email bounce (verify)
- –Phones locked behind Pro and up; EU accuracy is the loudest complaint
- –Monthly billing runs well over annual, and dead reveals still cost credits
RocketReach: Essentials $69/month (email-only, 100 lookups/month), Pro $119 (phones included, 250 lookups/month), Ultimate $209 (API, 1,000 lookups/month); annual billing roughly halves the effective rate. Overage runs $0.30-0.45 per lookup.
A lookup is billed on the reveal, live or dead, so Pro's ~$0.48 a lookup monthly-billed is the cost of an attempt, not a valid contact. Haircut by the self-reported 60-70% mobile accuracy (verify) and a genuinely live mobile really costs $0.68-0.80, with every dud along the way billed at full freight. The 20-30% email bounce does the same damage on the other column. You pay per reveal, most of the misses and bounces land on your dime, and the credits don't roll over.
vs Enrow: RocketReach charges you to discover which rows are dead; Enrow charges only when the contact is verified live — $0.35 per valid phone at Pro volume, EU dials documented, not a credit spent on a miss.
10. Findymail
I'll give Findymail its due: it's a real email finder, and on US addresses it performs.
Unlike SellHack, which spends a credit on every lookup, Findymail bills on the found, verified result — zero on a miss, zero on a bounce — the genuine pay-per-valid meter SellHack only markets. Point it at a domain list or a LinkedIn export and what comes back tends to survive a live send. We go deeper on the matchup in our Findymail breakdown.
The ceiling is geography and the floor price. GDPR closed EU phones to Findymail, so for European calling it's a spectator, and phones elsewhere are sparse. The plan floor is $49/month for 1,000 credits, unused credits carry over only to 2× your monthly allowance, and there's no meaningful free plan — just 10 trial credits. On my list its US addresses held up; the French half came back email-only.
- +Charged on found, verified results, so a bounce never costs you
- +Strong US B2B email accuracy
- +SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR-compliant, EU-hosted
- +Native HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Instantly and lemlist integrations
- –No EU phone data (GDPR-blocked); phones elsewhere are thin
- –Rollover caps at 2× the monthly allowance
- –No meaningful free plan; the floor is $49/month
Findymail is a single Starter slider: it opens at $49/month for 1,000 finder credits and steps up to $99 for 5,000 (the default card), then higher, with custom Enterprise above. Annual is about two months free. Phones cost 10 credits each (non-EU only); rollover caps at 2× the monthly allowance.
Per-valid billing keeps the sticker honest: the $49 floor is about $0.049 per valid email, the same as SellHack's Starter and roughly 2.9× Enrow's $0.017 at that 1,000-email volume, easing to $0.0198 at 5,000 and only nearing Enrow up at 100,000.
vs Enrow: same honest meter, narrower map, higher entry rate. Enrow opens at $17 instead of $49, prices a valid email at $0.017 against Findymail's $0.049 at that volume, and returns the EU direct dials Findymail legally can't.
11. Dropcontact
Dropcontact is the pick your DPO would make.
Everything runs under GDPR on EU servers, the data is computed fresh rather than pulled from a resold list, and it carries French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) most tools ignore. On emails it works pay-on-success: an address it can't find gets the credit reimbursed. For cleaning a French or European CRM, it's a fair specialist, and our Dropcontact page runs the full comparison.
But read the job description. Dropcontact enriches rows you already have; it isn't built to hunt a contact from a blank field the way SellHack or a finder is. Each processed contact consumes a credit, and phones appear only when one can be scraped from an email signature — so there's no direct-dial product behind the promise. It cleaned my French rows nicely and produced two phone numbers for a hundred contacts.
- +GDPR-first: EU servers, compliant by design
- +Pay-on-success on emails; unfound addresses are reimbursed
- +French firmographics (SIREN, VAT) built in
- +CRM-native enrichment for HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho
- –Enriches existing rows; not a real-time finder for new contacts
- –Phones come only from signature scraping, no direct-dial product
- –~$35 entry buys just 500 credits with no rollover; carry-over needs the pricier Growth plan
Dropcontact opens at €29/month, about $35 converted, for 500 credits with no rollover. Higher tiers add carry-over plus LinkedIn and company enrichment: €59 (~$71) for 1,500, €79 (~$95) for 4,000, on up to €1,349 (~$1,619) for 100,000; Enterprise is quote-only. Annual runs about 17% cheaper.
One credit per processed contact puts the entry math at about $0.070 per contact — roughly 4× Enrow's $0.017 at the same low volume — and the reimbursement only softens that on emails it fails to find. The multiple shrinks with volume but stays above Enrow, landing near 2× even up at 100,000. There's no per-phone figure to quote because there's no real phone product.
vs Enrow: the honest framing is enrichment versus finding. Dropcontact completes rows you already own and refunds the emails it misses; Enrow finds and verifies new contacts in real time at $0.017 per valid email against Dropcontact's ~$0.070 per processed row at entry, and returns documented EU direct dials instead of signature scraps.
Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.
Side-by-side comparison
How to choose
Final verdict
SellHack is a tidy little finder, and that's also its ceiling. Its $0.049 entry sticker is charged per lookup, not per valid result, so at a typical ~30% find rate plus a monthly reset that strands the rest it really costs about $0.16–0.21 per usable email — and it stops at emails, caps at 5,000 credits a month, and throttles the list builder to 500 rows a day. The moment you need phones, or volume, or a European calling list, you've outgrown it. Enrow is the switch: verified emails and documented EU direct dials, found in real time, from $17/month, charged only when the result is real. It won't hand you a browsable database or send your sequences — we left those jobs to LinkedIn and to senders like Emelia on purpose, because doing data only is why the data holds up. And nobody else on this page does the last trick: one click in the Chrome extension turns a LinkedIn profile into a complete verified contact, phone included, sitting in your CRM. Take the 50 free credits you get back every month and let your own list decide.
Every month, 50 fresh credits land in your account. No card, and they only spend on valid results. Test Enrow against the tool you're leaving.
Everything you need to know
What's the best free alternative to SellHack?
Does SellHack find phone numbers?
Is SellHack worth paying for?
What's the most accurate SellHack alternative?
How much does SellHack cost?
Can I export contacts from LinkedIn into my CRM?
How we evaluated these tools
Nobody paid to be here. No affiliate links, no sponsored slots, and the winner wasn't for sale. Every tool processed the same contact list inside the same week, and four measures decided the order: how many contacts actually came back, how many addresses bounced on a live send, what a valid contact really costs once bad results are priced in, and whether the tool can produce legally-sourced EU phone numbers. Competitor prices come from official pricing pages read on 2026-07-06; anything I couldn't confirm on a live page carries a "verify" mark.
ready to stop wasting time?
Connected in minutes.
Verified data in seconds.
no credit card
no setup required